CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Carl Chavez4 › Posts

Posts by Carl Chavez4

2 posts shown.

Seven participants responded by saying they have no intention of reading the books by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who many consider one of the most significant theologians of the twentieth century.
Doesn't that strike you as purely dogmatic? It’s exactly the kind of dogmatism that people following "free-form spirituality" use to attack any spiritual path that doesn't follow their specific style.

I suspect those who refuse to read a certain "dogmatic Pope" have likely spent their time reading, say, David Icke, Carlos Castaneda, or Lobsang Rampa. I certainly have. But I have also read Joseph Ratzinger.😉
In my view, both David Icke and Carlos Castaneda—along with all those other strange figures—are essentially worthless, phantasmagorical fluff compared to the surprisingly clear, open, and deeply human reflections of someone who ultimately achieved the final initiation within a 2,000-year-old tradition and published forty books.😲

It seems to me they don't hate the Pope because they've read him; they refuse to read him because they hate him..😉.

And yet, they still cling to the idea that they are incredibly spiritual and free-spirited, while labeling the Pope a dogmatist—a sentiment I have heard a hundred times from students of so-called "non-dogmatic" schools.😉.
From what I can gather, Joseph Ratzinger wrote roughly 40 books.😲
At least twenty have been translated into English.
He is frequently described as a "theologian Pope," a distinction that makes such figures relatively rare in the history of the Catholic Church.
(For instance, his predecessor authored relatively few books.)

Have any of you read one of his works? If so, what were your impressions?
What did you take away from his writing?

If you haven't delved into his work yet, do you plan to?

Do you consider Ratzinger's books to be spiritual in nature?
If you disagree, could you explain how you distinguish between spirituality and mere religiosity? Perhaps you could provide an example of a true "spiritual book" as opposed to
something like Ratzinger's works, which some claim are "just religion" or "purely theology."