Wage garnishments and collections
in Law ·
John Clark6 said:They aren't allowed to do that, though—but just so you know, when you make a payment, they don't apply it to the principal first. According to how the law is set up here in the States, they have to clear the collection costs first, then the interest, and only then does it touch the actual principal amount.
Thanks a ton for the reply.
Look, I’m gonna quote this follow-up letter I got from AT&T, dating back to 2001:
Dear customer, we are informing you that the debtor ---------, has settled the entire sued principal amount of ----- and court costs in the amount of ----- as of October 22, 2001.
Please note that the debtor paid $96 toward late interest as of October 22, 2001, and accordingly, the remaining balance for those amounts is $352.
The debt you are required to settle consists of the difference in the late interest payments in the amount of $352 credited to the creditor's account.
I have to point out that before I actually sent the money, I specifically asked them at AT&T for the exact figure I needed to pay, and I paid precisely what they told me to, so I was dead certain I had everything squared away...
So yeah, I still technically owe for those interest charges, and honestly, I’d love to just pay it off so I can finally get some sleep, but I have no clue where to even start because their account numbers have been changing constantly in the meantime...
And how on earth is it possible that in all this time there haven't been any invoices, warnings, letters, bank freezes, or anything? Not even a single notice from the court... I don't even know what stage my case is in right now. I've been working steadily since 2003, so they definitely could have collected from me if they wanted to...
Can anyone please give me some advice on how to fix this mess?
Thanks so much!!