Wage garnishments and collections
in Law ·
I just got a ruling from the court stating they’re suspending the enforcement process and rolling back every single action taken during the proceedings.
"Specifically, for a stay of proceedings under Section 180.a, paragraph 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code, certain conditions must be met before the one-year preclusive period expires: namely, that the judgment creditor hasn't been paid per the writ of execution, and they haven't filed a motion for judgment to modify the assets or the subject of the seizure.
The facts presented by the creditor in their appeal don't carry enough weight to trigger a different decision.
For these reasons, the creditor's appeal lacks merit and was denied, meaning the lower court's decision stands under Section 380, item 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in conjunction with Section 19, paragraph 1 of the UCC.
So now I'm wondering... is this enforcement actually dead? Has it been cleared with the Federal Reserve, or is my account still flagged under this thing?
Thanks for any insight...
"Specifically, for a stay of proceedings under Section 180.a, paragraph 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code, certain conditions must be met before the one-year preclusive period expires: namely, that the judgment creditor hasn't been paid per the writ of execution, and they haven't filed a motion for judgment to modify the assets or the subject of the seizure.
The facts presented by the creditor in their appeal don't carry enough weight to trigger a different decision.
For these reasons, the creditor's appeal lacks merit and was denied, meaning the lower court's decision stands under Section 380, item 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in conjunction with Section 19, paragraph 1 of the UCC.
So now I'm wondering... is this enforcement actually dead? Has it been cleared with the Federal Reserve, or is my account still flagged under this thing?
Thanks for any insight...