I guess you have to look at how global elites back gay movements through the lens of their attempts to dismantle national states, which are still basically the backbone of the world political order. I’ve mentioned this before, but
The edge managed to scrub my post, so here goes: support for "gay communities" seems like a political project driven by the global elite aimed at two things:
1) Within the EU, it's about chipping away at what's left of society based on marriage and family, thereby weakening and disintegrating the individual nations within the EU (bit by bit, from all sides). It's a way to undermine the general state structure that's still somewhat resisting predatory neoliberalism, forced integration, and the erosion of national sovereignty.
2) Outside the EU. Using the gay population as a minority against the majority to achieve specific goals—primarily weakening the state and installing politically compliant leaders who don't actually have to be gay. In most countries, including the USA, the gay population is a minority standing in opposition to the majority. This is especially obvious in conservative countries, like Russia or even America, where that divide is much wider. Supporting the gay population in those places is pretty much the same thing as those same global elites supporting Islamic extremists in Syria. Both are just minorities being used to serve a purpose. It's that same "bit by bit" strategy. Some statehood is lost to gay movements, some to national minorities that are given disproportionate influence, and some is snatched up by corrupt politicians; the end result is that the majority of the people can no longer govern their own country.
The edge managed to scrub my post, so here goes: support for "gay communities" seems like a political project driven by the global elite aimed at two things:
1) Within the EU, it's about chipping away at what's left of society based on marriage and family, thereby weakening and disintegrating the individual nations within the EU (bit by bit, from all sides). It's a way to undermine the general state structure that's still somewhat resisting predatory neoliberalism, forced integration, and the erosion of national sovereignty.
2) Outside the EU. Using the gay population as a minority against the majority to achieve specific goals—primarily weakening the state and installing politically compliant leaders who don't actually have to be gay. In most countries, including the USA, the gay population is a minority standing in opposition to the majority. This is especially obvious in conservative countries, like Russia or even America, where that divide is much wider. Supporting the gay population in those places is pretty much the same thing as those same global elites supporting Islamic extremists in Syria. Both are just minorities being used to serve a purpose. It's that same "bit by bit" strategy. Some statehood is lost to gay movements, some to national minorities that are given disproportionate influence, and some is snatched up by corrupt politicians; the end result is that the majority of the people can no longer govern their own country.