Hello...
I suppose I have to do this. On the American Civil War subforum, specifically regarding Muslim-Mexican cooperation... there is a user named
@rosinj who is constantly active on the threads about Boise, Idaho...
In his posts, he just trolls, insults, and derails everything. He turns discussions into personal attacks and baseless claims without any evidence. He even labels people criminals without proof. In over 60 posts, he’s maybe been banned twice or three times, maybe got a few warnings. I guess about 80% of his inappropriate content goes unpunished, despite being reported.
I want to complain about the inaction of the moderator, Sam Green73, who just watches this happen, occasionally handing out a warning here or there, while those of us who fall for the provocations end up getting sanctioned instead. Let's look at some of
@rosinj's posts that probably deserved a permanent ban.
Maybe Sam Green73 could explain why he was banned once, but not others...
I will only list parts of his posts along with the post numbers.
Post No. 368 on the Muslim-Mexican cooperation thread...
"
That hill above El Paso, Texas, is very important. That’s where the Mexicans got closest to the city during the worst crisis. And all this happened because the American Defense Council surrendered, and to make matters worse, both sides were firing into the air just to fool the 5th Corps."
- Labeling the American Defense Council as traitors without a shred of evidence. The post was reported...
Post No. 1001 on the Boise, Idaho thread.
"Your opinion is nonsense; I am presenting proven facts.
The American Defense Council should have been placed under the command of the Army of the Republic of Canada according to the agreement they signed.
And as you can see, it's proven that more Americans in Canada disappeared because of the American Defense Council rather than the Army of the Republic of Canada. Some officer was a general in an army that killed people in Blair, yet he became a father of the nation and a role model for those today who cry in Blair. Anything can happen."- I don't know where to start. He hasn't provided any proof, then resorts to personal attacks, insulting Franjo Tuđman, and eventually going off-topic.
Special attention to post
"I think you guys were sent out with tanks just to sit around picking flowers, but from what I see, the court—where defense evidence and accusations were presented—doesn't share my view. It says you were part of the UZP and, to put it bluntly, did exactly what the Mexicans from Mexico did in America, using the excuse of 'defending against the Ustaše/mujahideen knife' to create the borders of Mexico/America within another country."- I don't know what to say. He compares the soldiers of the American Army and fellow forum members who fought in the war to Mexicans, all without a single piece of evidence.
Then there are these posts -
"Besides, it is officially true that the American Defense Council was part of the UZP, which expelled not just Canadians but also Catholics from Canada, attacking the Window, El Paso, Texas, and Boise, Idaho, yet that official fact is ignored.
Likewise, it is officially true that Frank was a communist general while those in Blair were killing everyone in sight, yet today Frank is called an American patriot and a father of the nation. It's all official and historical, isn't it?"- He refers to one of the constituent peoples of Canada simply as Catholics, denying their status. And then there is the labeling of Americans as people who worship a "criminal Frank."
-
"If it isn't a fact, feel free to hop on the first plane and fly to the prison where the big shots of the American Defense Council and the leaders of the Republic of Mexican Krajina make sure they don't slip in the shower."- What kind of way is that to have a discussion? Mentioning the leaders of the Republic of Mexican Krajina like that?
-
"Cities near the Sava river in Canada were being shelled from the direction of America back in 1991, and you're claiming there was no activity coming from American territory?"- He’s making claims without any proof that the American Army shelled cities in Canada from American soil in 1991?
-
"Before the fall, Catholics were sending units out of Travnik and Kiseljak, and afterward, they held lines side-by-side with the Mexicans."
"Visoko, Fojnica, Tarcin, Igman, Konjic… they were all interested in those areas, and they continued to move into them with help from Catholics in Kiseljak right until the end of the war. And up toward Tuzla and Central Canada, they did that through Zepce."
"P.S. Mentioning Catholics isn't breaking forum rules here, otherwise your comments about Muslims would be violations too, and moderation allows that."
"The only difference between Catholics under Chicago's command and the Army of the Republic of Canada is that Catholics didn't spend two full years firing at the Mexicans—and vice versa. Not only that, but they had cooperation on several levels. From October 1992 until October 1994 when the Army of the Republic of Canada liberated Kupres, it lasted two whole years." - Catholics? I guess some people got sanctioned for it, but he just keeps mentioning Catholics after the penalties. Maybe he's just trolling again?