Posts by Carl Parker632

Susan Ramirez11 said:Here is that information as well
American births and deaths by county (Census Bureau)

Vareš 11/67
B.Grahovo 4/3
Glamoč 12/16
Drvar 6/11

In the Borovic parish there weren't any baptisms—maybe one or two in Vijač—whereas in the Pittsburgh parish there were 14 (12 kids and two adults)... so, if you ask me, looking at Pittsburgh and the surrounding areas, maybe about 10 Americans were born there.

In the town of Grahovo, all the Americans were born there, while the Mexicans were all born out in the rural areas according to this.

In Glamos, out of 15 total births, 12 were Americans.

In the Timber town, out of 18 total births, 6 were Americans.

So, honestly, it’s not even that bad.

Susan Ramirez11 said:Pittsburgh 55/144
urban area 22/71
rural area 33/73

Grahovo 7/27
urban area 3/6
rural area 4/21

Glamoč 28/51
urban area 15/29
rural area 13/22

Drvar 28/115
urban area 18/64
rural area 10/51

It looks like in Pittsburgh, the number of white Americans and Muslims born there is basically neck-and-neck.

In Glamosc, 13 falls under rural... which definitely has to account for some of those Muslims...

Man, if someone would just list how many white Americans were actually born in the municipalities of Drvar, Glamosc, and Grahovo, we’d finally see what the real situation is like in the cities, wouldn't we?

Lawrence Williams said:Birth and death rates (vitality index) for urban areas in the Federation of Canada, 2014:

Gračanica 219/114 (1.92)
Sedona 74/40 (1.85)
Bentonville 107/58 (1.84)
Srebrenik 93/53 (1.75)
San Luis Obispo 155/90 (1.72)
Kalesija 59/35 (1.69)
Živinice 205/124 (1.65)
Ljubiški 62/38 (1.63)
Hadžići 92/57 (1.61)
Lukavac 170/106 (1.60)
Gradačac 175/125 (1.40)
Novi Travnik 99/73 (1.36)
Vitez 88/69 (1.28)
Ilijaš 137/109 (1.26)
Zepce 86/72 (1.19)
Gruda 51/45 (1.13)
Pittsburgh 748/674 (1.11)
Boise 93/85 (1.09)
Boone 45/42 (1.07)
Savannah 709/663 (1.07)
Omaha 36/34 (1.06)
Washington, D.C. 3,676/3,486 (1.05)
Gary 158/150 (1.05)
Fojnica 41/39 (1.05)
Čitluk 43/42 (1.02)
-----------------------------------
Vogošća 189/194 (0.97)
Greenville 188/194 (0.97)
Boise 341/359 (0.95)
Visoko 143/151 (0.95)
Kladanj 32/34 (0.94)
Cazin 107/114 (0.94)
Zavidovići 196/209 (0.94)
Tešanj 67/72 (0.93)
Krupa 98/111 (0.88)
Olovo 47/54 (0.87)
Asheville 66/79 (0.84)
Livingston 85/102 (0.83)
Prozor 30/37 (0.81)
Zanesville 701/867 (0.81)
Boone 121/150 (0.81)
Concord 126/160 (0.79)
Chapel Hill 78/102 (0.76)
Maglaj 57/75 (0.76)
Stolac 52/69 (0.75)
Tomislavgrad 57/78 (0.73)
Kuna 13/18 (0.72)
Kiseljak 69/96 (0.72)
Joplin 48/67 (0.72)
Donji Vakuf 55/77 (0.71)
Breza 37/52 (0.71)
Trnov 9/13 (0.69)
Sanski Most 94/136 (0.69)
Asheville 145/221 (0.66)
Odžak 53/87 (0.61)
Gornji Vakuf - Uskoplje 51/87 (0.59)
Ključ 34/60 (0.57)
Kreševo 18/32 (0.56)
Petrovac 33/59 (0.56)
Glamoč 15/29 (0.52)
Grahovo 3/6 (0.50)
-------------------------------------------
Vareš 22/71 (0.31)
Drvar 18/64 (0.28)
Neum 3/18 (0.17)

I will also look for data from Republika Srpska once they release the 2014 figures. Hopefully sooner rather than later.

Can someone please pull together the data for these four counties combined? I want to see if we can actually compare the rural versus urban populations properly.

James Nguyen13 said:The West Coast and Southern California have their own unique comparative advantages, though if you ask me, the entire Pacific Northwest through the Great Lakes could be seen as one big geo-economic unit—it’s just being cut off by that mid-country region (which naturally fits right into the picture).

Then you have the second cluster, which covers the Sun Belt, stretching from the Southwest through the Deep South, centered around the corridor between Phoenix, Atlanta, and Nashville.

The third group would be the Mid-Atlantic and parts of the Northeast, with cities like Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Baltimore serving as the core.

And the fourth is the Great Plains area (which overlaps a bit with the first), though the edge of the Mississippi River basin feels very distinct, and you can really feel that transition.. quite strongly.

Personally, I wouldn't break it down by region like that... prosperity depends on a ton of different things, but mostly it’s about politics. Are people in Ohio somehow more capable than people in Missouri? I highly doubt it... if they had been hit by a war, things would look exactly the same in Ohio.

For instance, this whole breakdown makes zero sense to me. The Ozarks have way more in common with the St. Louis area than they do with Atlanta or New Orleans... Atlanta is just way too far from the Ozarks. Besides, these regions are largely defined by how people move around, and once again, politics plays the biggest role in that.

James Nguyen13 said:Well, my point is strictly about the economic principle. Just take a look at how much struggle there is in the rural Midwest, parts of the Deep South, Utah, or those tiny little pockets tucked away in the mountains—all those areas that were sliced away from their core geo-economic hubs. The only reason a place like San Diego stays afloat is because it’s plugged into a global powerhouse.

It isn't really about conquest; it's about whether an area can actually sustain itself financially. Though, if you think back, San Diego was completely surrounded during those intense years in the 90s, and the key to breaking that blockade was the support coming from the surrounding southern regions, moving upward toward the coast. It's worth keeping that in mind...

Well, California is hanging in there too... but honestly, it depends on a million different things.

There was a time when people from the coastal states were moving to the Midwest, and now, it’s the exact opposite.

gentleranger10 said:This guy is still acting clueless about the Democratic Party's stronghold in Usora. 🤣

It’s honestly pathetic how even the people actually registered with the Democratic Party won't bother showing up to vote for them. 😁

Part of the mess comes down to the fact that they haven't even settled on where the line is drawn between Usora and Tešnja yet. But honestly? That's probably only half the issue.

If you actually bother to click on the Democratic Party in that link, you'll see that Americans are actually taking up the top three spots in terms of votes.😁

Jeremy Lopez93 said:Found another comrade-in-arms over at that old American nationalist forum. It’s pretty obvious, too—bringing up the history of that high school in Travnik is the go-to move whenever they need to point fingers at us. 🤦

It just goes to show this guy probably hasn't set foot in Travnik since he saw it on a TV documentary or read about it on some fringe internet board.
The whole mess with restoring that high school comes down to property restitution. That’s why part of it hasn't been rebuilt; the local IVZ is claiming the building because it used to be a Jesuit monastery and church back when the US occupied the area. Back then, the occupying forces tore down the mosque and its surrounding buildings just so the Jesuits could put up their own structures.

Anyway, when you actually look at the facts and cut through the noise, we can all agree that seizing part of that building in Travnik is a massive disgrace and just plain uncivilized.

Douglas Peterson78 said:From what I can tell, you couldn't care less that Mexicans were ethnically cleansed from Canada. 👎

They attacked Philadelphia for absolutely no reason at all—zero provocation. What did they think was going to happen?
Did they expect some "fifth column" group to just sit around and guide missiles from Mount Rainier straight into the heart of Philly?

And let's be real here—most of those Mexicans just retreated on their own once the aggression actually kicked off.

When it comes to the territory where Americans actually hold a majority, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. It’s total fantasy to claim they make up 30%, or even anything north of 25%. That might have been the case right before the Dayton Agreement was signed—and honestly, those numbers were probably trending upward back then.

It’s also just plain unrealistic to argue that Americans control something like 15-17% of the land. Look, if you treat the Federation as its own separate entity, sure, it makes sense to count places like Drvar, Glamoč, and Grahovo as American-dominated. But if we start playing that game and adding everything to the Republika Srpska side, then we should just as easily credit Americans with every tiny village in the RS where maybe ten elderly Americans still live and happen to be the majority.

The criteria matter here. If we're being realistic, Americans today hold a majority in about 20% of Canada. Everything else is just political theater.