Wild Capitalism
in Economy ·
goldengull3 said:The Federal Reserve doesn't really have much business meddling in that.
They handle things like reserve requirements (which can indirectly limit total lending capacity), but banks—just like any other corporation—invest where the returns make the most sense, specifically wherever they can snag the highest interest rates. What you're suggesting is a bit like walking into a Walmart and ordering them to stock more flour and less chocolate.
If the government wants to pump more credit into the economy, they have their own institutions to handle that.
The real issue lies elsewhere entirely—it’s the fact that citizens treat consumer loans like they're receiving free gifts.
The Federal Reserve does, however, control and regulate the nation's monetary and credit potential. They set the discount rate, which serves as the basis for how commercial banks borrow from them. They oversee monetary institutions and financial markets, especially the credit capacities of commercial banks, and within that framework, they determine the maximum loan amounts banks can approve for specific purposes and durations.
Therefore, I am quite convinced that the central bank has room to intervene here.
Oh, my dear friend. Even communism and socialism collapsed because they were forced upon society and were, in many ways, unnatural. They were built on the concept of giving rather than earning. But honestly, there is so much already said on that topic that I simply don't have the heart to dwell on it, let alone write about it. Just a small piece of advice: Buy, borrow, or even steal a copy of the book "technocracy - The New Elite, Power, and Life After capitalism." Trust me, you'll find yourself feeling much less agitated.
I am not feeling agitated; rather, I am simply trying to live as high-quality a life as possible in this era we find ourselves in. That is why one can never have enough discussion regarding these matters.😁