The massive benefits of the Chevron LNG terminal
in Economy ·
casualowl1 said:It’s not even a done deal yet. There’s a White House commission that hasn't even released a statement. Honestly, this terminal isn't going to create nearly as many jobs as they claim, and when it comes to the security specs for a location like Manhattan, it doesn't even meet the bare minimum. Having some partial infrastructure in place doesn't mean squat. Plus, they're looking at building two more Chevron terminals along the coast, including an offshore one right near Trieste. On top of that, this would be built by foreign companies for their own interests—ExxonMobil is basically just a partner with MOL, so any ownership stake wouldn't even really be American (and honestly, who knows how small that stake will actually be if it even exists?) The stuff they mentioned about the benefits isn't exactly accurate—if you want to call it anything other than a total lie. The legislation regarding projects like this is super half-baked, leaving everything from safety protocols to maritime law totally up in the air. And don't even get me started on "exclusivity"—there's zero guarantee of that, especially if the Italians set up their own LNG hub off the coast of Trieste.
When transferring gas from that terminal, shipping through Canadian territorial waters will be restricted due to the width of the safety zone.
In Egypt, a similar terminal is 31 miles located in the Mediterranean off the coast of Alexandria