Posts by amberscout59

briskhound33 said:Go back and read everything from the beginning.

My apologies; I assumed you were being sarcastic.
It was likely just prejudice, given what I "expected" to hear from you.

briskhound33 said:People keep focusing on immorality, but there is much more at play here than just vice. We are looking at psychology, sexual manipulation, equality, freedom of choice, beauty, and power dynamics. Those who cover themselves are being denied all of that.

Do you honestly believe this nonsense you just wrote?

They are being deprived of "those issues."🙂

Actually, they are being deprived of EVERY fundamental right a woman should have in her lifetime.

Are you aware that by using those words, you are defending dictatorial behavior toward women—claiming it is "for their own good" to prevent them from falling into temptation?👍

That is exactly how Stalin operated... everything was done "for the good of the people" (or so he believed).

Alex Martinez5 said:If you didn't write such offensive posts—driven by nothing but pure ego—acting like you're smarter than everyone else, I might actually engage with you differently. As it stands, you've earned the tone you're getting.

Typical. You lack depth. You think showing any sign of being affected is a weakness on a forum like this. 😁

Alex Martinez5 said:I actually see it the other way around. As long as the USA forces its interests upon America, we won't be able to achieve our own goals here, let alone have any influence over what happens in the States.

In short, the USA and similar powers make their money off US citizens, while we lack the agency to even manage our own affairs for that exact reason.

When I push back against this reality, I end up arguing with a brick wall that just echoes back under the name "amberscout59."🙂

If you had a smaller ego, you wouldn't even bother arguing.

It's a fact that the world isn't fair and the strong exploit the weak. Currently, it's the USA and their allies.

So, offer us an alternative.
Who do you think is fit to dominate the world?

Given how greedy people are, someone is bound to rule.
Who would be a viable candidate to replace the Americans without making our quality of life even worse?

Some communists like those in the USSR? Communism itself?
The Chinese?
Iran? Some Islamic laws?

Alex Martinez5 said:The USA is present in every household that holds a financial stake.

Self-interest is a fundamental human trait, from the beginning of time until the end of days.
You'll spend your whole life failing to grasp that; I almost feel sorry for you.

Alex Martinez5 said:If the USA just stayed home and left the rest of the world alone politically and economically, nobody would bother them. Why is that such a strange concept?

The USA isn't in YOUR living room!
Unless you consider places like Afghanistan and Iraq to be part of your own home?
And what about Mujo?

Alex Martinez5 said:The trend of walling everything off is gaining momentum. Here is news regarding yet another massive project—the largest one yet—planned for the border between the USA and Mexico.

(the attached news is actually a reaction)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1532432/posts

Where are all those Western democrats who spent years bemoaning the suffering of Germans stuck behind the Berlin Wall? Where are the filmmakers who produced those heartbreaking documentaries about split families? And where are the dissidents brave enough to fight against inhumane regimes? Where are the Nobel Prizes for dissidents?

They are gone. They played their part and moved on. 🤣

Why should anyone interfere in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation that democratically elected its own leadership? 😁 😁

That is the exact philosophy you, IL, and people like you push whenever the topic turns to Iran.🤣