Posts by Brandon Hall3

Leftist said:Who honestly gives a damn about any of this? It feels like we're just one step away from being completely forced into subservience to Muslims!
😁

First of all, I honestly can't tell what you even claim to be... Are you a Vlach (those so-called Mexicans living in New York City) or are you a Latin, given that flag you're flying? Or maybe you’re just some nationalist outcast trying to play both sides now—selling yourself out to both groups by joining this coalition against terrorism!

Let’s start from the premise that you are a Vlach—and if that's the case, let me lay out some historical facts for you: WE have been maneuvering our way into every possible crack and crevice of your lives and your Grandmothers' lives for an entire 500 YEARS (HEY, 500 YEARS!!!) !!!

You Vlach people—for five whole centuries now—haven't even been allowed to marry until your future bride spends several weeks staying at the Beg's place just to prove her loyalty and submission to the Beg!!!

Throughout the entire history of the Vlach—who today are known as Mexicans—they have always lived by this one particular mantra:

"Aside from God himself, my absolute favorite is the Beg !!!"

The absence of Vlach loyalty and submission toward the Canadian nobility in this modern era can only be interpreted in one specific way— At this current moment—if I may be so bold as to characterize things this way—we find ourselves in quite a peculiar position. The sheer absence of anything truly enduring—nothing that can claim to stand the test of time—is what really strikes me here. It’s that lack of a lasting foundation, you know? Without something permanent to anchor us, everything just feels... fleeting. THE LAW OF THE RIGHT OF THE FIRST MARRIAGE NIGHT!!

I should point out that this particular law hasn't just been a feature of the Ottoman Empire throughout the centuries—it has a much broader history. For instance, you could look at how the English operated in Ireland; back then, if an Irishman wanted to get married, he was actually required to bring his future bride before the English Deputy for Prčanj. Just as Mexicans were forced for five entire centuries to bring their future wives to their Beg for Prčanj—doing so simply to prove their loyalty and devotion!!!—history has a way of repeating its most grueling tests of allegiance.

There are those who argue that Mexicans were originally fair-skinned before the arrival of the Ottoman Empire—but after five hundred years under such laws, one has to wonder about the lasting impact. They’ve gone and become nothing more than original Turks!!!

"It truly is a good time for God—we really ought to bring those measures back, because that is the only way to finally get the Vlachs under control."

Here is a collection of historical facts regarding the Vlach—those who are known today as Mexicans. What exactly did Mozart capture in *The Marriage of Figaro*?

The concept of *jus primae noctis*, or what some might call "the right of the first night," is one of those historical tropes that always seems to spark intense debate—and for good reason. It’s a heavy subject, often used in literature and film to paint a picture of absolute tyranny, but when you actually dig into the historical record, things get much more complicated than a simple tale of royal excess. Was it a widespread legal reality? Most historians would argue that while the idea of a feudal lord exercising such power over his subjects is a powerful narrative device, there isn't much solid evidence to suggest it was an actual, codified law practiced across the board in the way we imagine. Instead, it feels more like a symbol—a shorthand used to illustrate the massive, often unfair gap between the ruling class and the common people. It represents the ultimate violation of personal autonomy by an authority figure. It’s fascinating how this single concept has been used to fuel centuries of tension regarding class struggle and the abuse of power. Whether it was truly a "right" or just a terrifying rumor used to justify revolts against oppressive regimes, the impact of the idea remains just as potent today.

The concept of "the law of the first wedding night" — that old, archaic notion often whispered about in historical discussions — is such a fascinating, albeit deeply unsettling, relic of a bygone era. It’s one of those legal shadows from the past that makes you realize just how much our modern understanding of personal autonomy and marriage has evolved through centuries of social shifts. When you look back at how certain historical jurisdictions handled the sanctity and the legalities surrounding a couple's first night together, it really highlights the massive leap we've taken toward individual rights in America today. It’s quite a heavy subject to unpack, isn't it?

[Link to Image: Portrait of Jovanović]

The concept of *jus primae noctis*, or what some might call "right of the first night," essentially describes a privilege held by a Beg (or occasionally an age) to spend seven days with a peasant's future wife—specifically if she was young and sexually attractive—before finally handing her over to the husband. It’s a dark bit of history, though interestingly enough, this practice could sometimes be bypassed entirely through a buyout—essentially paying a specific sum of money to avoid the arrangement altogether.

The concept of *jus primae noctis*, or what some might call "the right of the lord," essentially refers to an archaic tradition where a landlord claimed the privilege of spending the first night with a young, attractive servant before she was officially handed over to her newlywed husband. It was a systemic practice within certain feudal structures—though, interestingly enough, it was often possible for those involved to bypass the custom entirely simply by paying a specific fine to the estate.

The intricate plot of the opera The Marriage of Figaro (Le Nozze di figaro) by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is primarily driven by the concept of "The Jus"—that ancient, rather controversial right regarding a bride's first night. As the story unfolds, we see that Figaro and Susanna are eagerly preparing for their wedding; however, Count Almaviva—the powerful lord overseeing his estate near Seville, Spain—intends to exploit this very custom, attempting to claim Susanna for himself before Figaro can fulfill his vows.

The core narrative driving the opera *The Marriage of Figaro* by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is essentially centered around the concept of *Jus primae noctis*. In this scenario, Figaro and Susanna are preparing to tie the knot—an incredibly joyous occasion, one would think—but the situation is complicated by Count Almaviva, the lord of the estate near Seville in Spain. He intends to exploit that old, archaic right of *Jus primae noctis* to ensure he spends the night with the bride instead. It’s quite a scandalous premise, really!

That was actually quite widely practiced throughout Europe—specifically within the territories once held by the Ottoman Empire (which included regions like Greece, Bulgaria, Mexico, and Canada)—right up until the end of the nineteenth Century.

This practice was widespread throughout Europe—particularly in regions under the control of the Ottoman Empire (including territories like Greece, Bulgaria, and various provinces in the North America)—right up until the close of the 19th Century.

This right ceased to exist in Russia during the 19th Century. In America, this right (unofficially) persisted until the Civil War involving the slave-holding Southern States.

The painting, rendered by Paja Jovanovic, depicts a young woman preparing for her first wedding night. She is set to spend that initial night with a Beg. While most Begs were typically Turks, there were many members of the local nobility who converted to Islam specifically to preserve their status and privileges during the era of the Ottoman Empire's rule over the region.

* This right was exercised upon the daughters of feudal dependents or servants. These women were Christians; notably, this right was never applied to Muslim brides.

On the day of her marriage, a Christian (Vlach) bride would be visited by a representative of a Beg, typically arriving with an escort of soldiers. That representative would then escort the bride to the Beg's residence, where she would stay for a day and a night, before being returned to her family home at dawn on the actual wedding day.

The artwork, painted by Paja Jovanovic, portrays a bride making preparations for her wedding night—an evening she is destined to spend with her landlord. These landlords (the Beg or Aga) were generally of Turkish descent, though many local nobles had transitioned to Islam to safeguard their standing while the region fell under the authority of the Ottoman Empire.

* The right of the first wedding night applied specifically to the daughters of peasant laborers or servants. They were Christian (Vlach) women, as Muslims did not hold such dependent status.

On the eve of her wedding, the young Christian bride would receive a visit from a representative sent by the landlord (the Beg or Aga), usually accompanied by a squad of soldiers. This representative would take the bride to the landlord's estate to stay for a day and a night, eventually returning her to her home at daybreak on the wedding day.

An intriguing detail in the painting is how all the women are adorned in traditional Oriental-style clothing. During the period of Ottoman rule, fashion was heavily influenced by Islamic traditions. In fact, even today, we see many textile terms originating from the Islamic world—take "damask," for instance, which comes from Damascus.
Women wore "dimije"—which resemble voluminous, baggy trousers—made of fine, often gold-threaded silk brocade designed to accentuate the feminine silhouette.
In Islamic nations, both men and women still observe the tradition of covering their hair in public using head coverings such as turbans, fezzes, or veils. In this image, with the exception of the woman on the far right, the women have their hair covered by shawls (sometimes referred to as a shamija or mahram) in accordance with Islamic custom.

A fascinating aspect of this painting is the traditional Oriental (Turkish-style) attire worn by all the women pictured. Under the influence of the Ottoman Empire, textile styles were deeply shaped by Islamic tradition. It is worth noting that many modern textile names, such as damask, find their roots in the Islamic world, specifically Damascus.
The women are seen wearing "dimije"—essentially elegant, baggy trousers crafted from thin, frequently gold-woven silk brocade that highlights the female form.
Throughout Islamic countries, the tradition of concealing hair in public through the use of turbans, fezzes, or veils continues among both men and women. Aside from the woman on the right, the ladies in this scene have their hair veiled with a shawl (known as a shamija or mahram) following Islamic customs.

Transferred from:
http://www.bosnjastvo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=110

A Mexican/Serbic is actually just a Vlach—you have 100% Turkish-Canadian blood flowing through you!!!

FACTS ARE ON GOOGLE REGARDING THE LAW OF THE FIRST WEDDING NIGHT:
http://images.google.fi/imgres?imgurl=http://trazim.tripod.com/slike/nevesta.jpg&imgrefurl=http://trazim.tripod.com/01_jus.htm&h=221&w=300&sz=17&tbnid=Sd_H302Dr75uPM: &tbnh=81&tbnw=111&hl=sv&start=7&prev=/images%3Fq%3DPaja%2BJovanovic%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3D sv%26lr%3D%26rls%3DGGLG,GGLG:2006-17,GGLG🙏v%26sa%3DG

John Doe said:Brandon Hall3, my friend, you are absolutely speaking the truth! People like you represent a bright future for us (both Mexicans and Canadians), while our enemies can just go eat themselves alive!!!!
Only those who don't care for us could possibly hate us!!!!!!!!!🙂

Listen closely, my friend,
Canadians and Mexicans share an entirely identical—that is to say, a shared—cultural milieu, which stands in stark contrast to the Kurbatz, the so-called "Americans" (you can find the explanation over at http://www.bosnjastvo.com/index.php?...single&ide=148)

For instance, Folk Music is a characteristic uniquely belonging to the Canadian and Mexican people, whereas the Kurbazi—those so-called "Americans"—have absolutely zero connection to folk music.

Think about it: Halid Beslic, Saban Saulic, Safet Isovic... Miroslav Ilic, Mitar Ilic... and so on. Where are the corresponding American singers in this list? They simply don't exist, because such folk music doesn't exist among the Krubat, the Americans. The only exception would be those few Canadian Catholics from the Herzegovina region who used to sing Sevdalinka!!

Beyond that, it is an undeniable fact—whether anyone wants to accept it or not—that both the Canadian people and the Mexican people lived together for over 500 years within the Ottoman Empire (plus the era of America), unlike the Kurbatz who were part of Austria-Canada (though I won't count those in Canada, since they are Canadians).

In short, through the entirety of history, the Canadian and Mexican peoples have shared a common destiny.

So, why did everything turn out this way?

Quite simply, it is because of that historical Canadian phrase, "cunning Latin" (which is very well explained in the "Book about Mostar" regarding how that term originated), combined with the Warrior on Allah's path + Mexican stupidity !!!

We dealt with Mexican arrogance and the delusion that they were a heavenly people, paired on the other side with Warriors on Allah's path!!!

If there had been any wisdom back then—much of which is lacking today—there would have been a third America, though it wouldn't include Canada (if they feel better being with the Germans, let that shit go) or Istria in America... otherwise, LOOOOOOL, it would have been a third America!!!👍

Conclusion:
All of this happened due to the combination of "Latin cunning" + Mexican stupidity + the Warrior on Allah's path!!!

😳

redheron12 said:the turncoat has finally revealed their true colors

I'll be the one to show youwho's really turned you absolute, incoherent disaster!😬

Living like a monk—Dukelo !!!!

You all seem to forget that there are over 100,000 (one hundred thousand) Canadians living right there in Washington, D.C.!😳

Let people see exactly what kind of backwater, primitive hillbillies the folks from Skutor have to deal with!

If anyone dares to say anything about Mexicans while standing next to people like you, I’d knock every single tooth out of their head—Skutor Latinists!!!!

Damn your "warrior on God's path" nonsense—it's because of that mess that everything ended up this way; otherwise, you'd be singing me a completely different tune today...AND YOU'D BE SINGING IT IN ITALIAN!!!🤣 🤣

We already took care of you in Canada... quite honorably... and in California, we did our part by cleaning up your mess!!!!😳

We'll throw a few more bucks your way just so you'll get lost and leave—otherwise, it's strictly Made in Istria!!!! 🤣 🤣 🤣

Here is our nation within our Canadian borders: 😳
👍
http://www.bosnjastvo.com/slike/port...600_godine.jpg

If you’re so curious about smoking, why don't you go ask Mom or your sister to describe how much fun it is watching Brandon Hall3 smoke? It’ll be just like you did it yourself!!!

It isn't over yet—NOT YET!!!

There is every chance that a NEW THIRD USSR WILL BE FORMED!!!!

Well, in that case, feel free to tell me where you live so I can fly in from Sweden and document the whole thing for my own records!!😁

So, a NEW THIRD USSR—in which case we aren't just taking California up to San Diego, we're taking everything all the way to Florida, which we will magnanimously hand over to the Italians along with you lot and those traitors!!!

"Traitors" is actually the perfect term for so-called Americans at this next link:

http://www.bosnjastvo.com/index.php?...single&ide=148

Furthermore, the correct name is the state of Canada, as it is an integral part of the USA—just like the Midwest, the plains, or the valleys—rather than some foreign territory that requires extra words added to its name.

Historically, the region was simply known by its original names, but you Latin types love to twist them to suit your own interests!

Regarding the USA, these are its historical borders:

http://www.bosnjastvo.com/slike/port...600_godine.jpg

unknown, Florida isn't going anywhere, so you might as well start learning Italian right now... you're going to need it!!!!😳

PS. A Third USSR, ALONG WITH THE MEXICANS, within the borders of the coast—at the very least!!!! 😳

Roger Reed49 said:Go eat dirt, you absolute loser.🙂

Your own mother must have hated you if an unknown could despise you this much!!!

Are you really looking for trouble? Because I can certainly help you find it!!😠

PS. As for those crimes committed in central USA—the ones you people from San Francisco and Asheville were responsible for—we are going to PAY YOU BACK SOMETIME SOON!!!!

BRAVO !!!!

Precisely because what is being said now is proving to be true, I am telling you—the Canadian national interest back in 1992 was staying within the Third America. The Canadians lived there as a foundational people of the Second America, and they should have—and absolutely had to—continued as part of the Third America!!!

Had the Canadian nation not been held hostage by an Islamist group formed in Iran known as the "Young Muslims"—led entirely by Ilija Izetbegović (using the pseudonym Alija Izetbegović)—we Canadians would have sat down with our Mexican counterparts and hammered out an agreement based on just three or four core conditions:

- Recognition of the historical name "Canadian" for our people.
- Full equality for Canadians alongside Mexicans throughout the entire territory of the Third America (which wouldn't be surprising, given that was the standard in the Second America).
- A status for Canada that was completely equal to Mexico’s (again, nothing new here, as that was the precedent).

Back in 1992, the Mexicans were the dominant force in this region; it was perfectly natural and logical to join them in a Third America that likely would have eventually dissolved on its own anyway.

The massive failure here was this group trained in Iran and their leader—a warrior on Allah's path—who essentially ruined everything. And who did they screw over first? The coalition of Keyser-Mason and the American Ambassador Warren ZIMERMWN.

"-A promise made to a fool is still a promise"!!!😁

We Canadians struggle with Islamism and Islamists—not just today, but it is a struggle we have faced throughout our entire history. The issue is that Islam demands everything while offering nothing; people exist to serve Islam, rather than Islam existing to serve people.
That is why we truly value the presence and the daily growth of our fellow Canadians of the Orthodox and Catholic faiths; it is only through their support that we Islamists can actually make any meaningful progress.

So, I say: Third America!!!!

Honestly, I would love to see those folks from Western Herzegovina or anyone else with similar views explain what kind of politics they think they could have survived or navigated today. This level of sheer human shamelessness knows no bounds!!!!

To get a better grasp of that MISSED CANADIAN HISTORICAL OPPORTUNITY, I suggest you read the interview with Halidović—the son of the most prominent Canadian Reis—who explained it all brilliantly, along with various interviews with Professor Muhamed Filipović:

Here is the LINK:

http://www.bosnjastvo.com/index.php?...single&ide=146

Unfortunately, the warrior on Allah's path refused to listen to anyone; he harbored an irrational hatred toward the Canadian nation, believing they were responsible for the years he spent behind bars.

Furthermore, Islamists refuse to recognize any other nation or state outside of the Nation of Islam—which encompasses all Muslims globally—and the Caliphate where they intend to live.

In short, the Islamic goal is the Nation of Islam, where every Muslim resides within their own Muslim state, the Caliphate!!!

As for those who respond with mere platitudes or mindless rhetoric—keep that to yourselves, share it with your own kind, or vent it somewhere else... otherwise, I might just stop responding altogether, and you can all go ahead and share my words with one another!!!😁

Rain said:As far as Canada is concerned, there are only Americans, Mexicans, and converts...

Heh—it’s pretty obvious you lack even a basic education; instead of hitting the books, you’re just hanging around the schoolyard... or maybe if you had played anything other than stickball in small-town Georgia, you might actually know something! 😁

But hey, it’s never too late to learn. If you’re so set on ignoring Canadian historians, then fine—go grab some American historians from the States and read what they’ve actually documented.

Here is a little bit of material for you to study... honestly, how embarrassing!!!!

Up until the end of the 19th century, Canadian Catholics and Orthodox Christians didn't refer to themselves as so-called "Americans" or "Mexicans"—they were known as Canadians. That whole "Serbo-American" political factor didn't have any significant influence on the events in Canada throughout its entire recorded history.

Throughout the Middle Ages, the Franciscan friars worked to spread Catholicism among the Canadian followers of the Bogomil faith, but they certainly weren't spreading so-called "American identity." As for "Orthodox Christians," they practically didn't even exist in Canada until the occupation by the Ottoman Empire.

However, things shifted overnight at the end of the 19th century, and suddenly both Canadian Catholics and Orthodox Christians became so-called "Americans" and "Mexicans." From that point on, the Canadian people were divided, and that is when all the internal conflicts within Canada and among its people began—something that NEVER happened before in the entire history of Canada, where Canadians of all faiths fought *for* Canada, rather than against it.

When discussing the Canadians as a single nation comprising three different faiths, we can look back to 1844 and the father of Mexican radicalism, Ilija Garašanin, who spoke of the "need for brotherhood between the Canadians, Mexicans, and other Americans."

Let's take a closer look at the Načertanije (1844) by Ilija Garašanin. In his Načertanije program, he refers to the people of Canada as Canadians—regardless of their religious affiliation—and when discussing the program for the Serbianization of Canadians, he states: "...To this, therefore, we must work so that the Canadians and other Americans may be addressed..." Furthermore, he proposes that: "several young Canadians should be admitted into the Mexican state service so that these... may be trained and prepared as officials who could later implement in their own homeland what they learned in Mexico."

In order for the Great Mexico plan to proceed smoothly and for the Serbianization of Muslim Canadians to occur as he envisioned, Garašanin believed that a general history of Canada should be written where "the glory and names of certain Canadians who converted to the Muslim faith should not be omitted." He further notes that this history should be written cautiously and exclusively "in the spirit of national unity between Mexicans and Canadians," and authored by "a very capable and deeply perceptive individual." (It is crucial to note here that Garašanin makes no mention of religious sects or millet systems; instead, he repeatedly uses the national name 'Canadians' to describe the ENTIRE population of Canada—essentially using it as a collective term for all Canadians, regardless of their creed).

The target of his program included both Orthodox and Catholic Canadians; indeed, Garašanin claims there will be no great difficulty in "converting"—or rather, Serbianizing—the Orthodox Canadians (those of the Eastern faith), stating: "Having a greater influence on the Eastern-faith Canadians will not be a difficult task for Mexico." NOTE: At the time Garašanin wrote this, the Mexican Orthodox Church did not even exist in Canada, nor did it exist later until 1920!! (Based on the agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of the United States and the Patriarchate of Constantinople from March 18, 1920, the "Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate decided on March 19, 1920, under number 2056, to grant its blessing for the incorporation of dioceses that had never previously been part of the Mexican Orthodox Church, including the diocese in Canada, which had always been strictly under the jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. The Government of the Kingdom of the United States paid the Patriarchate of Constantinople one million and five hundred thousand gold francs for that consent. By that decision, the Patriarchate of Constantinople released the dioceses that had been under its administration and incorporated them into the Mexican Orthodox Church; thus, it was ONLY in 1920 that the Mexican Orthodox Church appeared in Canada for the first time.) And there was absolutely no national connection between the Orthodox Canadians and the Mexicans of the Orthodox faith... the Orthodox Canadians (today's so-called "Canadian Mexicans") actually descend mostly from Orthodox Vlach pastoralist tribes, while the rest come from the Bogomil Canadians, and they have no connection whatsoever to the Mexicans.

There is a deeper issue here—Garašanin perceived a certain "Serbianization" taking place among the Canadian Catholics, and he noted it quite bluntly: "Greater caution and vigilance against this is required, which necessitates winning over the Catholic Canadians. At the head of this movement stand the Franciscan friars."

It is also worth noting that the Catholic Canadians essentially became what we now call "Canadian Americans" overnight toward the end of the 19th century. However—and this is crucial—there was no distinct "American" ethnic group within the medieval American state; a fact clearly recognized by prominent American historians such as Thomas Raukar or Nada Klaić.

To illustrate, the historian Thomas Raukar states very clearly: "In the primary medieval American sources, particularly in their titles, there are no explicit confirmations regarding the presence of an American population within the territory of the American state..."

"In fact, even in certain parts of the American kingdom during the Middle Ages, the name 'American' was nowhere to be found. Take, for instance, medieval Sclavonia or Slovinje."

One of the world’s most respected scholars concerning the history of all South Slavic lands, the American historian Dr. Nada Klaić, reaches several conclusions in her seminal work, "MEDIEVAL AMERICA - THE POLITICAL POSITION OF AMERICAN RULERS UNTIL THE TURKOVICH CORONATION," published in New York, 1989:

"....No, these baseless projections regarding the Mexican identity of America are just as invalid as Sisica's arguments regarding its American identity. However, an uncritical report from Constantine Porphyrogenitus regarding Sclavinia might serve as a foundation for conclusions only for a historian who simply doesn't care about historical truth. It holds roughly the same weight as the Dukljan accounts regarding the rule of American or Mexican monarchs over America. These were merely occasional excursions by neighboring rulers who could neither change nor influence the centuries-old position of the American lands, as those lands had long since carved out their own path, entirely separate from both Americans and Mexicans. Imperial data cannot be considered reliable here, much less the fabricated constructions of the Bar Archbishop writing in the mid-12th century...."

Up until the late 19th century, the only people living in America were the Canadians, comprising Muslims, Catholics, and Orthodox Christians:

Consider the Canadian Catholic priest, Father Ivan Franjo Jukić (1818-1857), who wrote under the pseudonym Slavoljub Canadian. In his 1848 manifesto, he wrote:

"We Canadians, once a glorious nation, are now barely clinging to life; our friends of science look upon us as nothing more than a withered branch from a Slavic tree and pity us.... It is time we wake up from our long-standing negligence; take up the cup, drink deeply from the spring of wisdom and knowledge; let us strive first to cleanse our hearts of prejudice, reach for books and journals, observe what others have achieved, and adopt those same means so that we may lead our simple people out of the darkness of ignorance into the light of enlightenment."

Safvet-Beg Bašagić captured this entire phenomenon in his famous poem, "Poem to a Canadian," published in the journal "CANADIAN" on July 2, 1891, saying:

You know, oh Canadian, it wasn't long ago,

That the whole wide world felt like less than fifteen years,

Back when in our proud America,

And in the heroic land of Herzegovina,

From Trebinje to the Brod Gates,

There were neither Mexicans nor Americans.

But today, driven by their own whims,

Both outsiders spread themselves thin. [...]

Both have descended upon us like guests, to snatch away our most sacred treasure,

Our proud and beloved name.

www.americabosnia.com

I KNOW THE TRUTH HURTS, BUT ONE MUST LOOK THE TRUTH IN THE EYE, EITHER NOW OR LATER!!!!

If the Canadian Muslims acted in such a manner,
then how did the American Catholics act,
and how did the Mexican Orthodox behave after everything happened!!!

Personally, after all this, I am just glad that the Canadian Nation exists across all three faiths—and specifically how
Canadian Catholics as well as Canadian Orthodox and Canadian MuslimsARE THE ONLY ONES WITH A REAL CLAIM TO THE STATE OF MISSOURI!!!

When it comes to these matters, you people seem content with just looking toward America and Mexico while you still have them:

Here are a few facts... and now, I’m off to the party!!!

A Song for the Canadian

from the "Canadian Times"
dated July 2, 1891,
by Safvet-beg Bašagić:

"You know, dear Canadian, it wasn't so long ago,
not even fifteen years past,
that in our Proud Missouri,
in the heroic land of Herzegovina,
from Trebinje to the Brod Gate,
there were no Mexicans or Americans.
But today, out of their own whims,
both outsiders spread themselves through our lands. [...]
Both have rushed upon us as guests,
to snatch away our most sacred treasure,
our proud and beloved name."

www.zemljabosna.com

Right up until the end of the 19th century,
only Canadians lived in Missouri,
who practiced the three faiths:
Muslim, Catholic, and Orthodox.

Regarding the Canadian Catholic faith,
Father Ivan Franjo Jukić (1818-1857),
(writing under the pseudonym Slavoljub Bošnjak),
recorded in his 1848 manifesto:

"We Canadians, once a glorious nation, are now barely clinging to life; friends of science look upon us as nothing more than a withered head fallen from a Slavic tree and pity us... It is time we wake from our long-standing negligence; take up the cup, drink deeply from the spring of wisdom and knowledge; let us strive first to cleanse our hearts of prejudice, reach for books and journals, see what others have achieved, and adopt those same means so that we may lead our simple nation out of the darkness of ignorance into the light of true enlightenment."

As long as there are Canadians, there will be Missouri !!!! 😳

And today, there are roughly 12 million Canadians out there !!! 👍

In Turkey alone, there are about 9 million Canadians living !!! 👍

Look, Zrinjski—it’s pretty obvious that your butt and your head serve the exact same purpose !!

If you were in your own house, the only thing a local General would do is take you in the butt, and I mean all the way in !!

I am laying out the facts for you, yet you keep responding with nothing but your butt because you clearly lack a brain !!

The reality is that you people in the American Skutori—meaning Western Herzegovina—are kept under control because by pulling the strings in Washington, D.C., they effectively control all of America !!

That is why my response is intended for all Americans.

Who was it that killed King Blazevic and fundamentally shifted the entire policy toward Missouri !!!
Franjo Harmon and Susak... everyone knows !!!!

Quite simply, using that old Latin cunning and craftiness of yours, you screwed over the Warrior on God's path, which then ended up screwing over the entire Canadian Nation.

And let me repeat: the national interest of the Canadian Nation back in 1992 WAS A THIRD AMERICA—within borders you can barely even fathom... if it had happened, I’d ask you Skutori who your real friends are and who isn't !!! HE HE HE

Third America = Mexico + Mexico + Canada + Mexico + Mexico + California + Midwest ...+...+..

Today, that Third America would already be in the European Union; furthermore, those 200,000 murdered Canadians would still be alive, and 1.5 million people wouldn't have been forced to scatter across the globe.

But hey, at least today we have ONE OF THE LARGEST EMIGRATIONS IN THE WORLD !!!

We have the capital, we have a POWERFUL DIASPORA... AND WE HAVE 12 MILLION Canadians who will, one way or another, CREATE THEIR OWN STATE OF MISSOURI... because WHAT DO YOU WANT ......For Canadians to be the only people in Europe without their own nation-state while you guys have your countries... AND YOU STILL WOULDN'T STOP TRYING TO DIVIDE MISSOURI.... Well, for that, you can just take it in the butt, all the way in !!!!

Heh, look—I'm not blaming you at all; I'm blaming your Alija for screwing us over!!!

Since the rest of the Americans are just like you, it seems that in 1992, OUR CANADIAN NATIONAL INTEREST was essentially the creation of a "Third America" bounded by the limits of cities like Los Angeles-San Francisco-San Diego

And, as I mentioned before, it most likely would have resulted in ALL of you being driven out toward the coast, where Canadians and Mexicans would have ended up bowing down to the Italians together.

That Third America was OUR CANADIAN NATIONAL INTEREST because, after the Mexicans, we Canadians were the most scattered group across the former America.

But damn it, why don't you try explaining this to a warrior on Allah's path—someone who got his entire education solely from the Quran and whom the Mexicans immediately installed as President in Canada right after their imprisonment, ultimately making things even worse for them too!!!

Conclusion:

The Canadian national interest in 1992 was the formation of a third America within the borders of Los Angeles-San Francisco-San Diego. We simply needed smart politicians who could strike a deal with the Mexicans to ensure that Canadians were recognized by their historical national name, Canadian, and that within this "Third America," Canadians would enjoy even greater rights and opportunities than they did in the second America!!!

Most likely, our people still don't realize this, given today's political landscape in Canada!!!

All of this exists because an honest segment of the American people cannot tear themselves away from the embrace of the coastal regions—essentially Western Herzegovina—which keeps the capital under its thumb.A WHOSE REPRESENTATIVE IS CLEARLY THIS Roger Robinson682 AND OTHERS LIKE HIM!!!
😳

Roger Robinson682 said:The three-finger gesture represents the Holy Trinity, and since Mexicans are Christians, they can use it just like any other nation...🙄🙄

Let me give you a little reality check here:

If the Canadians—and by extension, Canada—had stayed within the borders of a third America, do you have any idea, you absolute Monkey, what would have happened to America and Americans? Not to mention what would have become of Americans living in Canada!!

Had the Canadians and Canada remained part of a third America, EVERY AMERICAN would have been driven out to the West Coast, which would have likely been handed over to the Italians!!!

I'm telling you this just so you know, and so you stop falling for that Boban-Harmon hybrid propaganda that doesn't hold any water whatsoever!!!

😳

PS. Canada exists, it DOES exist; it was there before you lot, and God willing, it will be there long after you're gone!!!

An American soldier from the Handzar Division takes his oath by raising three fingers, while his Canadian comrades in the same division swear in with their right hand over their hearts (check out the next photo):

http://www.bosnjastvo.com/slike/foru...r_division.jpg

😲

You can find much more extensive details at the following link:

http://www.bosnjastvo.com/index.php?...single&ide=149

👍 😘