4 posts shown.
coppergardener said:Look, I did this super fast because I was in a rush, okay? I knocked it out in like ten minutes flat so I didn't really look back at any mistakes. Usually, you'd need a bit more time to actually make a high-quality translation, but you seriously have to understand that we aren't going to obsess over perfect syntax or specific vocabulary right now, alright?
Anyway, no offense intended, but I really hope you don't need this for a grade. 🤣
And honestly, there’s no shame in asking; this text wasn't exactly rocket science. For some of us, doing stuff like this is actually pretty good practice, though it sucks that you don't always have the free time for it. But hey, there's always someone around to help. 😉
Translation:
In scientific literature, there are several reports regarding lead concentrations in the placenta. Since the placenta consists mostly of blood, maternal, and fetal components, one would expect lead levels to be equivalent to those found in the blood, unless there are specific areas where lead tends to concentrate. However, the values reported in various studies vary quite a bit and are generally higher than blood levels (you could also say serum levels. I think that sounds better.). There are two possible explanations for this. First, there might be a mechanism within one of the placental components that concentrates lead—for instance, in the trophoblasts—but that hasn't been proven yet, and based on what we know about lead transport mechanisms across the placenta, it seems unlikely. KHERA et al. (1980), in a study analyzing placentas after delivery from women working in the lead industry, found that placental lead levels in live births averaged 0.29 (plus/minus 0.9) ug/g, whereas in stillborns, it was 0.45 (plus/minus 0.32) ug/g. In the live birth cases, it was confirmed that there had been no occupational (so, work-related) exposure to lead in the two years preceding delivery. Regardless, these levels are significantly higher than those seen in the general population. The stillborn group exhibited even higher levels, likely due to increased deposition of calcium and lead (it says calcium-lead... I guess they form compounds... I don't know much about this stuff, I'm a linguist, and when it comes to medicine, I'm just a layman, so I'd probably have to double-check...) in the placenta. Ultimately, as expected, elevated lead levels in the placenta are linked to the duration of occupational exposure to lead, and the measurements (values) of lead in the amniotic fluid (amniotic fluid) and fetal membranes are also quite variable and, generally, higher than those in the placenta, though the significance of this remains unknown/unestablished.
you're welcome. ☕ 😁
P.S.: And I'm not actually that bad at this. 🎉
This is awesome! Thank you so much, you helped me out a ton!!! THANK YOU!!! 👍 👍
So, what, is everyone just gonna sit there and watch? Is there seriously nobody around to lend a hand here?
You might look at this thread and think, "Wait, what does this have to do with this subforum?" but trust me, it totally does! Basically, I’m just trying to get a quick hand with translating a small snippet of text from English... I actually already had two lovely ladies over on another board help me out with one paragraph, but now I’m stuck on this one, and honestly, I feel too awkward to go bugging them again for another favor! So, if there’s anyone here who's fluent in English and doesn't mind doing a quick translation for me, I’d seriously appreciate it! Here’s the text I'm looking at:
The medical literature contains various reports regarding lead concentrations within the placenta... Given that the placenta consists primarily of maternal and fetal blood, you'd naturally assume the lead content would mirror blood levels—unless there are specific areas where it tends to pool. However, data from different studies shows quite a bit of variance, with levels typically running higher than what's seen in the blood. There are basically two ways to look at this. First off, there could potentially be some sort of lead-concentrating mechanism within certain parts of the placenta, like the trophoblasts, though nobody has actually proven that yet; based on what we currently understand about how lead moves across the placenta, it seems pretty unlikely. In a 1980 study conducted by KHERA and their team involving placentas from women working in lead-based industries, they found that lead levels in placentas from healthy live births averaged 0.29 ± 0.9 ug/g, while levels in stillborn placentas were higher at 0.45 ± 0.32 ug/g. For the purpose of the study, "healthy" meant the mothers hadn't been exposed to lead through their jobs in the two years leading up to delivery. Even so, these numbers are still higher than what you'd see in the general American population. The stillborn group showed even steeper increases, which might suggest more calcium-lead precipitation occurring in the placenta. As you might guess, higher lead levels in the placenta were linked to both the mother's age and how long she had been working in an industry involving lead. Measurements taken from amniotic fluid and fetal membranes also show significant variation and generally trend higher than placental levels, though whether that actually matters is still anyone's guess.
Thanks!
Christian Johnson53 said:Given the scriptural teaching that no one comes to me (God) except through my son (Jesus Christ), I find myself wondering what becomes of the souls who never placed their faith in Christ? Furthermore, is it even possible for a spirit to reach God at all without that connection?
hi
I don't mean to sound narrow-minded, but honestly, it's just the one and only way. If we're talking about getting to Almighty God, it's only possible through His Son, Jesus Christ. All that stuff about self-realization or positive thinking isn't going to cut it here. God wants us to own up to our own sinfulness and accept it, and then find salvation through Jesus Christ, who died specifically for those sins we're supposed to confess to Him. The salvation God offers is free, sure, but don't mistake that for being cheap—it's priceless. That's why God points to just one single path, and that's His Son, Jesus Christ!