Šešelj destroys the witness
in Close to Politics ·
Gregory Howard said:I haven't sat through the video in question, so I can't offer specific commentary on its contents. However, I can state the following:
* most of these so-called expert witnesses are mediocre at best.
* Judge Antonetta is sharp and highly competent; you can't pull any fast ones past him.
* Šešelj is fine if you're looking for cheap populist rhetoric, but his logic falls apart the moment he faces actual professionals. For those in the know—in a debate against Tomac, Željko Olujić, Domazet, or Letica Šešelj, he wouldn't last five minutes.
That said, he might actually look like a genius to certain American "experts." That wouldn't be a difficult feat.
Whatever. It's not that I'm impressed by Šešelj's speaking skills, but grouping those three idiots together with Olujić is... 🤣 🤣 🤣
Tomac is just a washed-up convert for whom a simple sentence is an abstract concept, provided you ignore his mediocre talent for building dogmatic structures.
And his above-average ability at finger-pointing regarding the communist past.
As for Domazet, he'd probably be better suited for a lead role in some Uri Geller-style documentary. You know, bending spoons, making spirals, twisting things back for second use, and so on...
And Letica? She should probably just go work for Fashion TV. Ever since that vivid little outfit she wore during the elections.🤣
Regarding his doctorate back during the era of communism 🤣
All in all, 😂