Posts by crimsoneagle0

First, there was all this massive buildup, everyone was making these huge threats about what would happen at the meeting, acting like they were going to tear heads off, and now? Suddenly, it’s all "Oh, I’m not coming" or "I have nothing to say." It's like everyone who was talking such big game just completely vanished into thin air! They sent out the notice three days ago, and then we even went around calling people individually to make sure they understood their specific roles and agreed to show up, but still...
Now we're just sitting here in this weird limbo, waiting to see who's actually going to step up and who's going to try and screw us over during the session. Honestly, if it weren't for certain people making me feel so incredibly unwelcome, I probably wouldn't even bother showing up myself.

The very first item on our agenda was the change of the CEO, and based entirely on the actions she detailed, Nicole Myers made her decision right then and there! Once that was settled, we moved through the rest of the points on the list, everyone was in total agreement, and we made sure to pass those decisions along to the rest of the group.
Well, after a few members left the meeting, Jane suddenly pulled out this stack of papers filled with accusations that nobody had even heard a whisper of before...
It was quite a mess! After the meeting wrapped up, Nicole Myers actually tried to backpedal, telling us we shouldn't try to collect signatures because she might sue us—apparently, you never know who someone has connections with in these circles! So, we headed straight to the corporate headquarters to ask if we were actually allowed to gather signatures, and they told us, "Yes, that is absolutely your right." Then, Jane turned to the management and said, "Tell the lady she doesn't need to bother coming to lead the meeting, because nobody wants to see her anyway!" Honestly, I could never dream of saying something like that; I would never forbid someone from holding a meeting just because I felt like it. And regarding what Nicole Myers said about putting the paperwork aside so the CEO could come hold the meeting with Microsoft and PNC—I would never have taken that initiative on my own! We decided to go ahead and collect the signatures, but while we were doing it, she kept reciting whatever was in her email draft, and Jane just kept spinning her web of discontent and lies. And oh boy, once we handed them in, a representative from CNN showed up that very same day and went straight to the executive office, carrying those papers as if they were some kind of illicit evidence used to justify removing her! Now, the board is sending everything to the legal department for review, and once they clear the documents, PNC and the FBI are going to hold a meeting where they’ll turn the tables and accuse *us* of illegally removing her! It’ll basically be PNC stepping in as the CEO to claim we ousted Microsoft through unlawful means and that they’re launching a lawsuit against us. In the meantime, the former CEO actually thanked Nicole Myers for replacing her, saying she was sick and we were just a burden she was glad to be rid of! She’s even threatening to sue us for slander, lying, misleading people, and causing damages to Zillow. It is simply not true what Nicole Myers is claiming—that she asked PNC to attend with her—that was just a flimsy excuse to bait me into the meeting so they could stage a coup against me. That’s why Nicole Myers mentioned to me privately how terrified LGB was when she called Zillow and told her, "Get here fast, don't embarrass me, I have to be there!"
Then, at the very end of all this drama, she tries to play the victim with the CNN rep, claiming she was only asked to help collect signatures—basically washing her hands of all the lies and accusations she threw at everyone else! When he asked her what basis we had for holding the meeting, she shoved her papers and accusations in his face, claiming *those* were the grounds, which is a complete fabrication! Neither the CEO nor I presented those; she improvised the whole thing, spewing her grievances and ignorance to smear the former CEO. She was truly the mastermind behind the "divide and conquer" strategy...
Just one thing I need to set straight: I never once said she was taking anything, despite what Natalie wrote to me in her messages. Natalie told Sandy about all the nonsense this woman was talking, and Sandy warned her, "Don't you dare try to collect signatures at meetings like that; it has to be handled by management and the CEO." Furthermore, the decision to change the CEO wasn't based on any of those accusations just so they could intimidate us and pretend we committed some kind of crime. We didn't.
The only thing that matches anything in Jane's papers is from two years ago, when my right-hand woman, Alice, requested certain 3-way reports and specifications that we never actually received.
And as for that comment from the CNN rep about not asking the board too many questions regarding those papers because things aren't "above board"—it's not because they were being shady, it's because he was openly telling her that the documents she wrote weren't even valid!

Well, I just found out some absolutely juicy details, and honestly, my heart is just racing! First off, it turns out Microsoft was intentionally rotating shifts just so any random supervisor could represent the company in court since she can't do it herself. And get this—after her shift change, without even a whisper to me (because they’ll try to make it look like I was acting behind NB's back, even though JH and the CIA were actually the ones trying to convince me that she was totally in sync with PNC and Microsoft and would defend us, yet they'd still find a way to corner me!), they went ahead and gathered signatures to replace Microsoft with NB. I didn't even know! I stumbled upon the whole thing online by accident, and now they're setting the stage to accuse me of defying official decisions. They want to trigger VAR and GR at the meeting to clear the air about whose decisions are whose and under what legal authority, which is why they went out for a private lunch with their attorney and met with management. Apparently, they've been plotting with all the other supervisors behind my back for ages; like Jane always says, I'm just their sacrificial lamb!
Basically, NB didn't invite PNC to the meeting because of that report she mentioned to me; no, the board is holding this meeting specifically with PNC so they can gang up and claim I was acting against everyone else's orders. Then, he can launch a lawsuit against me! NB actually told me after her meeting with him that he has enough ground to sue me for anything, especially after I mentioned how nervous she was about us collecting signatures to replace Microsoft. She basically admitted he was coming just to build a case against me! On top of that, she mentioned that the lady who pushed the FBI to collect those signatures kept bragging about how "my daughter is a doctor," as if to imply that they absolutely have to get rid of me because I'm too unpredictable with my actions and choices. That's why she was put in that role, and they've even got CNN monitoring everything so they can see who does what—and she'll be more than happy to hand over all the recordings and messages to the police...
The whole thing is clearly a coordinated effort among you all to deceive me lately. Suddenly, everyone is on my side, everyone is confessing things to me and acting like we're such good friends, but when you were all plotting against me, you wouldn't even look my way! Like Jane said, people are so two-faced; once PNC shows up to the meeting, the story will change completely because they've already aligned themselves with PNC, VAR, GR, and NB to frame me... And now, out of nowhere, AR and NB are whispering behind Jane's back about how she seems like a "sick woman," just so they can pretend *I* was the one who said it, giving them an excuse to lash out and claim I'm the unstable one...
And NB keeps interrogating me about GR, just so she can later say, "Oh, you told me that!" I mean, I only spoke up because she kept probing me, not because I was venting about her! It's so suspicious how she always has these very specific questions prepared right at the exact moment they're being discussed with someone else (your main conspirator against me). Now GR is claiming she's being accused of taking kickbacks—even though Jane admits she was the one who said it—so they'll make it look like it came from me. That's why RR keeps questioning me about her, trying to plant seeds through our conversations behind my back.
You can try to weave whatever web you want, but please, just leave my people alone; they haven't done a single thing to you.
VAR, I told NB that you all were unhappy with the decision and that we needed a meeting so everyone could voice what they want and don't want, because that's the only fair way to handle it. But instead of talking to me, you just want to sue me because you think you have a judge who knows everything. That's why NB warned me to watch my back, saying you never know who's actually on whose side—as if we're some kind of hardened criminals doing something illegal! In the end, it'll probably just turn out that Microsoft was being honest about that ten-year loan, and I'll likely end up taking the fall for it again as if it were my mistake. Thanks!

I just ran into Dennis and Susan while they were out driving, and get this—he actually had the nerve to tell her how glad he is that things are finally moving forward, clearly making a jab at me and the whole legal process you all have going on against me. He even added, with that smug little grin, "Christmas really is a season of miracles," as if he’s some kind of saint.
It honestly feels like there is this massive, coordinated effort to just wipe us out entirely, to push us to the fringes and finish those endless schemes you've been spinning against us for years now! You're all just desperately trying to manufacture some kind of mistake on my part, hoping the SEC will come down on me just because your own external operations have completely fallen apart. Honestly, can we just have a little bit of integrity for once? Stop with the backstabbing and the dirty little tricks, and please, stop trying to paint me as some paranoid lunatic or someone losing their grip on reality... I know exactly what's happening.

Jane, I was just sitting here reflecting on how you told me that Microsoft, in coordination with everyone else who signed that petition, would basically push aside my private lawsuit and try to have me declared unfit for court—like, mentally unstable or having some kind of psychological disorder, which is absolutely wild! It feels like there’s been this constant stream of subtle traps being set for me lately, all designed to look like my own actions. For instance, when M. wrote about how Ms. Solomon had been harassed by a certain woman, you guys intentionally misled me by saying Zoe had chased her off because she was unhappy with her work, just so you could frame me as the culprit; you’d claim I was the one responsible because of something I mentioned back in March 2015. Then Zoe would tell me that M. had called multiple times to meet but never actually showed up, just to smear my reputation and lead me astray, or how she claimed she requested specific files that were never released and that termination papers were never sent. Even the NBA was calling her out, asking why she wasn't showing up for meetings, while the CIA was making statements claiming M. keeps changing her contact numbers and isn't responding, or failing to fix issues regarding the bathroom situation, and constantly tagging Zillow. Meanwhile, Microsoft kept nagging about how there was no one to turn to and how she was in danger because of the wiring issues that Natalie didn't fix until after M.'s shift. And then Natalie, she only took photos of my meeting documents just to make it look like I was "chasing the truth," rather than showing your actual involvement, just so she could frame me for accusing her of stealing money—because if she uses my messages, it'll look like I'm the one accusing her instead of you! She sends me these texts about money being taken and theft as if I have any idea what's going on, even though I never once said anyone stole anything; I simply stated that we've been asking for account specifications for two years now without receiving them. On top of that, she pretended to post a notice just so it would look like I was the one who took it down and violated someone's rights, giving her grounds to sue me, even though she herself told me to "hurry up and take the notice down." At the end of the day, the only truth is that I was the one calling M. for over six months, and they only finally showed up once I reached out to PNC, because she was ignoring me and I eventually stopped communicating with her and started dealing with him directly, all while you kept her fully informed.
And Jane, you seem to be forgetting that you actually told PNC, "And feel free to tell her she doesn't need to hold the meeting since we don't want to see her anymore (nobody wants to see her)" on behalf of everyone, and the CIA backed you up on that, though I stayed quiet—mostly because I would never say something like that, nor would I ever take down someone else's notice or restrict a right they are entitled to, even if you were trying to pin that on me! And honestly, the accusations you leveled against her and how you practically attacked a man because of her—essentially acting out a role just to target me... Why? After all, she's the one who got everything fixed in the house through insurance much faster than she originally wanted to because you kept insisting she had no right to do so.
Furthermore, the way you, the CIA, AR, RR, Microsoft, TJ, the NBA, ZP, and yourself deliberately led me into a trap—using intermediaries to nudge me toward committing a criminal act, like forging signatures—is just staggering. You gave false statements about Ms. M. and G., constantly criticizing and insulting them, filling my head with lies and deceptions just so I would tell Natalie to hold a meeting based on those falsehoods. Then, you turn around and say that everything said at that meeting will be used against me to make it look like I'm threatening everyone, claiming that *I* was the one who said there wouldn't be a reprogramming, when in reality, you all agreed and didn't want a reprogramming or Ms. Solomon either.
My dear friends, since you were actively encouraging me to engage in actions that constitute criminal behavior through these collective decisions, that makes you accomplices in the very crime you are trying to pin on me and portray me as some lunatic who doesn't know what she's doing. Since you willfully misled me, I genuinely believed under the circumstances that my actions were permitted; at the time, I had no way of knowing the act was unlawful, and it wasn't something I was responsible for or could have possibly known. In this situation, you are all co-conspirators and participants in the very acts you are trying to charge me with. Bravo!!