Carl Wilson said:Look, I know I’m basically reposting what I wrote a couple of days ago, but seriously, we are flying blind here. There is zero strategy, and if you listen to those press conferences, you can't even tell what the actual goal is supposed to be.
If the whole point is reaching some kind of herd immunity, then this entire approach is a total bust because there is no way we're ever getting there with these numbers. Instead, the move should be keeping cases at the absolute max that the healthcare system can actually handle without collapsing. Right now, it feels like the goal is to drive infection numbers down to zero, which is just impossible no matter what restrictions they slap on us—just look at what happened over in Mexico. So, my question is: what happens in a month or two? The task force really needs to step up and tell us exactly what the game plan is.
I’m wondering what happens six months from now when hospitals are overflowing with people who missed essential diagnostics and medical care during their 3rd and 4th months of this mess.
Honestly, it all leads to the same place: let the chronic patients stay home, let healthy people get on with their lives, and just test hospital staff daily. That’s it.
Hospitals need to be open for patients. It breaks my heart to see a facility like Dubrava sitting completely empty—and anyone who has ever even walked through those doors knows exactly what kind of place that is.
Our healthcare system is already collapsing anyway; waiting lists are endless. If you want to actually find out if you're sick in a timely manner, you're forced to go private.
By the way, in Germany, hospitals are functioning normally for patients, even with 80 million people and 120,000 infections.