CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › briskeagle11 › Posts

Posts by briskeagle11

7 posts shown.

Modeling Workstation in Desktops ·
Timothy Kim60 said:Since there isn't much of a performance gap between the 2GB and 4GB models in most scenarios, they could probably squeeze in a cheaper 240GB SSD alongside the HDD.

It’s likely they're running SolidWorks, CATIA, or something along those lines. Honestly, the 460 is the obvious call for that budget for a few reasons—it fits the price point perfectly, those specific programs tend to play nicer with AMD Graphics (assuming that's what they're looking at), and if you look at Nvidia's options, both the cheaper and pricier alternatives like the 750ti or the GTX 950 don't come in 4GB versions, making the 2GB variants a bit of a bad value.

If they ditch the HDD and that smaller SSD—this goes inside instead.

Thanks so much to everyone again, 👍 I think I'll go with the option featuring the beefier SSD.

Best,
Modeling Workstation in Desktops ·
Hey Kimberly Gomez34, thanks a ton for the help here.

I’m not entirely sure which specific software they're running—all I know is it involves some 3D modeling, though honestly, this rig isn't being built primarily for that kind of heavy lifting 🙂)

In any case, I assume a 4GB graphics card is the way to go. Why would you suggest going with the 2GB version? Is that just to keep the price down, or do you think it makes more sense to prioritize a larger capacity SSD instead? I've been weighing whether it might be better to just grab one beefier SSD rather than trying to balance a combination of an HDD and an SSD.

Thanks again, regardless.
Modeling Workstation in Desktops ·
Hey everyone,

I’ve had some pretty great experiences following advice from folks on this forum before (X2), so I figured there was no harm in reaching out for some guidance again, especially since this particular area is somewhat outside my wheelhouse.

So, I’m looking for some kind souls to toss some recommendations my way for a build intended exclusively for 3D modeling software. The core requirements are basically a decent processor, plenty of RAM, and a beefy graphics card. In theory, the specs aren't all that different from what you'd want in a gaming rig, but I’d love to hear what you all suggest for this specific workflow.

To keep things moving, here’s the rough list of components I’m looking to put together:

16 GB RAM
A graphics card with at least 4GB VRAM
An Intel Core i5 processor
A 1TB Seagate Barracuda hard drive (though it would be ideal to have a separate SSD just for the OS)

In terms of the case, I’d prefer something as compact as possible because space is a bit tight where I am, though I realize that a powerful graphics card doesn't leave me much room to maneuver in that regard.

Also, if anyone has a good 24" monitor they’d recommend, please let me know.

My budget is hovering around $1.75; I heard that’s about what it takes to pull off this kind of setup, though I’m not entirely certain, so I could potentially stretch it a bit. That said, I’d really prefer to spend as little as possible, so please don't feel obligated to hit the maximum limit if it isn't necessary. 🤣

Thanks a ton in advance!
PC Build under $300 in Desktops ·
Timothy Kim60 said:So, I've got one of those ASUS Prime H81M-K boards lying around—it's an LGA 1150 socket, runs on the Intel H81 chipset, and fits that standard mATX form factor we all know so well. It supports dual Channel 2 xDDR3, which should be plenty for whatever basic build someone is putting together.
Just picked up a single Intel Celeron G1820 (2.70GHz, 512KB, 2MB, 54W, 1150) Box.
Just one single stick of 4GB DDR3 from Crucial, running at 1600MHz with CL11 timings.
Just one 1TB Seagate hard drive, running on SATA III at 7200 rpm—specifically that ST1000DM003 model.
I’ve got one of those Corsair VS Series power supplies sitting here—the 350 Watt model. It's a standard ATX unit, running on the ATX12V v2.31 spec. Just a single unit for now.
I’ve got one LG GH24NS on hand—it's a DVD±RW drive that handles 24x DVD±R, 8x DL, and 40x CD-R speeds if you're still into that sort of thing.
I’ve got one Zalman ZM-T2 PLUS micro tower case available—it measures roughly 189mm wide by 427.5mm high, with a depth of 364mm.

$659 I suppose I should probably get around to addressing this, though I find myself drifting off into thoughts about how much more complicated things have become lately compared to when we were all just tinkering with basic setups in our garages. There’s a certain rhythm to these discussions that I always appreciate, even if they tend to wander quite a bit. Anyway, looking back at the specs being tossed around, it feels like we're constantly recalibrating what "entry-level" actually means in the current market. It’s a bit of a moving target, isn't it? One day you think you have a solid handle on what makes a functional build, and the next, everything shifts under your feet. But let's stay on track for a moment.

You’ve got VGA, DVI, and HDMI right there on the motherboard—three different outputs to choose from, so just pick whichever one works for your setup, and if you run into any compatibility issues, you can always just grab a cheap VGA to DVI converter or something similar to bridge the gap.

Regarding the graphics cards—I’m telling you, they all come with three outputs now, even those bottom-of-the-barrel budget models. $100 So, you're looking at a GT 610 or an HD 6450—assuming they have VGA, DVI, and HDMI—but honestly, that feels like throwing money down the drain. They aren't exactly going to outperform the integrated graphics on a Haswell chip anyway. Plus, when you're trying to squeeze a decent PC together for two people on a tight budget, those cards just don't fit into the math. I mean, technically, you could probably make room for one if you cut corners elsewhere—maybe ditch the fancy tower, grab a cheaper case, swap out the power supply for something basic, or settle for a smaller hard drive instead of a 500GB one—but let's be real, there’s just no point in spending the cash.

Robert Rodriguez2 said:Looks like a really clean setup!

I’ve got one single 4GB stick of Crucial DDR3 sitting here, running at 1600MHz with CL11 timings.
I've got one Toshiba 500GB drive on hand—it's a 7200rpm model running on SATA 6 Gb/s with a 32MB cache, specifically the DT01ACA050.
I’ve got one AMD Trinity A8-Series x4 5600 sitting here, clocked at 3.60GHz with those four cores on the FM2 socket.
I’ve got one of those Asrock FM2+ FM2A58M-HD+ boards lying around, specifically designed for those FM2+ sockets that handle up to 95W or the FM2 ones that can push 100W.
I’ve got one of those Spire Kepler Rev.2 units on hand—it's that compact cooler, roughly 96.5 by 51 by 125 mm, sporting a 92mm fan, and it covers a pretty wide range of older sockets like 1156, 775, and FM1.
I’ve got one of those MS Castor Midi towers on hand—it’s a standard ATX/mATX setup, and it actually comes with four 5.25" external slots, which is a bit of a rarity these days if you're looking to throw in an optical drive or some extra controller cards.
I’ve got one of those Corsair VS Series power supplies sitting here—it’s a 350 Watt unit, standard ATX, running on the ATX12V v2.31 spec. Just a basic, reliable little thing for a build that doesn't need much juice.

$708
Well, here's a little something for you. $40 It’ll be more, sure, but you’re getting an immediate jump to a quad-core processor and 4 gigs of RAM, which honestly makes a world of difference. If you're looking to tackle anything even remotely demanding, it’s going to handle it just fine—it'll actually perform like it's supposed to. 🙂

Just one stick of DDR3 4GB Crucial RAM, running at 1600MHz with CL11 latency.
I’ve got one MS Castor Midi tower case on hand, which supports both ATX and mATX layouts, and it features four 5.25" external slots if you still need room for those old-school optical drives.
I’ve got one of those Corsair VS Series power supplies sitting here—the 350 Watt model, standard ATX, running on the ATX12V v2.31 spec.
I’ve got one of those ASUS Prime H81M-K boards on hand—it's an LGA 1150 setup running that H81 Express chipset, featuring two DDR3 slots.
Just picked up an Intel Pentium G3420 (3.20GHz, 512KB, 3MB, 54W, 1150) Box.
Just one Toshiba 1TB drive sitting there—it’s a 7200rpm model with a SATA 6 Gb/s interface, 32MB cache, specifically the DT01ACA100.

$636
Or maybe go with Intel.

Guys, I really appreciate the help, though this one is being pretty stubborn about insisting on that more expensive graphics card; honestly, at this point, it’s possible he might already have it tucked away somewhere.
So, if we’re looking at how that motherboard, power supply, and CPU would actually play together in a build... what kind of setup are we talking about here?
Is this looking alright?
I was looking over the specs for the ASUS Prime H81M-K again, and it really makes you think about how much hardware has shifted since the Haswell era. It’s one of those boards that just sits there, doing exactly what it’s told without any unnecessary flair, which I suppose is its own kind of charm if you're into that sort of thing. It’s a bit like a reliable old sedan—nothing flashy, but it gets you from point A to point B without making a scene. It handles an Intel Pentium G3220 or even an Intel Celeron G1820 just fine if you're building something low-key, though I find myself wondering why anyone would bother with anything less than an Intel Core i3 4160 these days. You've got your dual Channel 2 xDDR3 slots and the standard mATX layout, which keeps things simple. If you were trying to squeeze some actual performance out of a budget build, throwing a GTX 750 in there changes the whole vibe, turning a basic office machine into something that can actually handle a few light games. I saw Timothy Kim60 mentioning something similar a while back regarding older chipsets, and honestly, he had a point about the longevity of these builds. Even when you're running something modest like an AMD Trinity A8-Series x4 5600, the stability of the platform is what matters most. It's not about chasing benchmarks; it's about whether the system stays upright when you actually need it to. It's a measured way to look at it, I know, but I've always preferred a steady machine over one that runs hot and loud just to win a single round of a game.
I was looking over some specs for the AQPROX APP550PS recently, and it got me thinking about how much we tend to overlook power supply units until they actually decide to quit on us. It’s one of those components where you really want stability over flashiness, though I suppose everyone wants that RGB glow these days. It's a bit like choosing a reliable sedan over a flashy sports car; you don't necessarily need to win a drag race at a stoplight in Los Angeles, you just need to know the engine isn't going to sputter out when you're merging onto the freeway. Anyway, I was reading through some old threads where Robert Rodriguez2 was mentioning similar builds, and it reminded me of how much the landscape has shifted since the early days of Haswell architectures. Back then, everything felt a bit more straightforward, didn't it? Now, with all the different modular configurations and efficiency ratings, you almost need a degree in electrical engineering just to pick a unit that won't fry your motherboard. I remember seeing a comment from briskeagle11 regarding voltage ripples on these mid-range units, which is always a valid concern if you're running anything remotely sensitive. It’s funny how we obsess over the GPU or the CPU, yet the PSU is essentially the heart pumping blood to the whole system. If the heart fails, the rest of the expensive hardware is just a very heavy, very quiet paperweight sitting on your desk.
Intel Core i3 4160, 3600 MHz
PC Build under $300 in Desktops ·
Yeah, you've got a point there, and honestly, that's exactly where my head was at too. I can't quite put my finger on the specifics, though—I'm guessing it’s some kind of web design thing (not really my lane, probably why I stick to a dual monitor setup), but I'll definitely do some digging to get a better handle on it. 😁

That being said, I'm looking around right now, and it seems like there aren't many budget-friendly options out there that actually offer two outputs—meaning the GPU, specifically, ideally with at least 2xDVI. http://www.amazon.com/Graphics-Cards/b?node=1234567

So, if it's doable, I'd be looking for something in the ballpark of maybe $200 or so, paired with any graphics card that provides two outputs, like a VGA and a DVI.

EDIT: Thanks, Timothy Kim60.
PC Build under $300 in Desktops ·
Hey guys, first off, major props to you all: you're doing a great job here. 🙂

A while back, I picked up a build put together by one of the veterans on this thread for another user—I think it was graniteharbor85 who helped out—around $667, and I’m not popping in here to complain or anything; actually, I'm incredibly satisfied with it and am looking to get 🙂 more.

Basically, I'm looking for the most budget-friendly configuration possible, though there are a few specific requirements I need to hit:
- An external graphics card with and two outputs (this is essential because the PC will be used for some relatively demanding software, so I need the ability to run a dual-monitor setup), something along the lines of this* http://www.nabava.net/graficke-karti...-pcie__5618131

*Just a heads-up, I don't know my way around hardware perfectly, and I realize the card I mentioned might be a bit pricey, so if there's an alternative—something cheaper with similar performance—that would be great, provided it still has those two outputs and a 3D accelerator.

- I'll be running Windows 7 on it, either 32 or 64-bit, doesn't really matter to me.
I guess that covers the basics, 🙂 effectively.

From what I gathered reading through this PDF, building my own rig seems to be the smartest way to go, but please correct me if I've got that wrong.

Anyway, I hope I've laid everything out clearly enough, and if anyone has a kind soul willing to lend a hand, I would be extremely grateful.

My budget is sitting at, let's say, roughly $2,000, so I figured I'd post here rather than starting a whole new thread—if my graphics card requirements are pushing me way past that amount, just tell me straight so I don't embarrass myself further, though feel free to suggest whatever you can within reason. 😁

Thanks in advance.
Hey everyone,

I was wondering if anyone could give me a quick rundown on what I actually need to look out for when it comes to licensing Office 2010 for a small business. I’m trying to figure out the best way to handle the purchase—like, how do prices usually shake out, where's the safest place to buy it (should I be looking at eBay?), and do we really need to keep physical stickers or COAs on hand for any potential audits? There are just so many little details to consider...

I did try digging through this thread to see if someone had already covered this, but I haven't quite found the specific answers I'm hunting for. It’s becoming a bit of a situation because my boss is really breathing down my neck to get this sorted out immediately, so any help would be greatly appreciated.