Obesity and exercise
in Hobbies & Leisure ·
Way to go, amberheron62 ;o)
Home ›
Daniel Fisher8 › Posts
Posts by Daniel Fisher8
2 posts shown.
Obesity and exercise
in Hobbies & Leisure ·
Hi everyone... felt the urge to jump into this discussion—here’s my take...
First off, I want to emphasize that in the world of fitness—especially when working with recreational clients—there isn't just one path to a specific goal. You can lose weight and drop body fat through steady-state cardio, HIIT, circuit training, long-distance runs, fartleks, metabolic conditioning, step aerobics, swimming, cycling... you name it. I constantly hear from confused people asking things like, "Coach X said lifting weights is the key, Coach Y told me I have to run fasted, and Coach Z insisted intervals are the only way."
I mention this because I think this confusion really hurts the profession and the trainers trying to make a living here. When every trainer pushes their own specific dogma, people end up feeling foolish—and eventually, they just lose trust in the industry altogether. They're left spinning in circles, not knowing who to believe...
A quick word of advice to both of you—whether you're certified kinesiologists or not (I assume we're all in similar boats here, so it's in our collective interest):
We should probably agree that for the general public, there are dozens of ways to hit a target. It would be much better if we explained it to people that way. Some coaches swear by low-intensity steady state; others love circuits, intervals, CrossFit-style WODs, or Tabata. Some prefer bodyweight movements while others lean toward heavy external loads—which makes sense, given that we don't all come from the same athletic backgrounds. We all have our preferences.
To be honest, I find this debate interesting because it's clear you both have real experience, but also a bit childish—it’s just "intervals are better" vs. "no, aerobic is better," over and over again...
Come on, folks, let's be adults. Training science has evolved significantly and will keep evolving. Every day there are new methods, new modalities, and new tools being developed.
Why is it so hard for certain trainers—and those giving advice on forums or in local gyms—to grasp that every single method has its own set of pros and cons? That's how we should be presenting this to the general public, who aren't nearly as deep into the weeds as we are...
First off, I want to emphasize that in the world of fitness—especially when working with recreational clients—there isn't just one path to a specific goal. You can lose weight and drop body fat through steady-state cardio, HIIT, circuit training, long-distance runs, fartleks, metabolic conditioning, step aerobics, swimming, cycling... you name it. I constantly hear from confused people asking things like, "Coach X said lifting weights is the key, Coach Y told me I have to run fasted, and Coach Z insisted intervals are the only way."
I mention this because I think this confusion really hurts the profession and the trainers trying to make a living here. When every trainer pushes their own specific dogma, people end up feeling foolish—and eventually, they just lose trust in the industry altogether. They're left spinning in circles, not knowing who to believe...
A quick word of advice to both of you—whether you're certified kinesiologists or not (I assume we're all in similar boats here, so it's in our collective interest):
We should probably agree that for the general public, there are dozens of ways to hit a target. It would be much better if we explained it to people that way. Some coaches swear by low-intensity steady state; others love circuits, intervals, CrossFit-style WODs, or Tabata. Some prefer bodyweight movements while others lean toward heavy external loads—which makes sense, given that we don't all come from the same athletic backgrounds. We all have our preferences.
To be honest, I find this debate interesting because it's clear you both have real experience, but also a bit childish—it’s just "intervals are better" vs. "no, aerobic is better," over and over again...
Come on, folks, let's be adults. Training science has evolved significantly and will keep evolving. Every day there are new methods, new modalities, and new tools being developed.
Why is it so hard for certain trainers—and those giving advice on forums or in local gyms—to grasp that every single method has its own set of pros and cons? That's how we should be presenting this to the general public, who aren't nearly as deep into the weeds as we are...