Posts by Sean Moore

coppersailor28 said:Now they’re going to sue you just because you called him a d*ck (you completely ignored what Sean Moore said) 😬

Watch this. We are in the middle of a serious discussion regarding blatant moderator bias and the targeted harassment of specific groups who share certain philosophical and religious views (which, if you do the math, covers a massive chunk of the global population—so just consider how much arrogance and fascism we're actually dealing with here). In a debate this heavy, your big contribution as a moderator is to make jokes about my username? Is that really the best you can do?

Pathetic.

The fact that you'd resort to that is the ultimate proof that everything Henry Kim3 and I have argued in this thread so far is ABSOLUTELY TRUE.

Pathetic. Did I say pathetic?

Nicholas King said:I'm guessing you don't have the time to actually go out and find the proof for such a serious insult, do you?

Look, we aren't God. It isn't our place to sit in judgment and start labeling people as "good" or "bad." If we actually claim to be devout, authentic believers, then stepping into that role is something we simply shouldn't be doing. Period.

And then there was that period when Blue Bird was running the show as moderator. 👍 It was a level playing field, honestly. Even if you had just one Creationist standing toe-to-toe against ten evolutionists, the fight felt balanced. At least in the sense that both sides were allowed to use the same terminology and speak the same language. Sure, there were insults flying—some subtle jabs from the evolutionist camp and some straight-up blunt attacks from others—but the debate kept moving without hitting a wall. In the end, everyone walked away feeling like they actually had the freedom to speak their minds.

But then things shifted. Arthur Flores2 and Henry Kim3 decided to jump on the bandwagon and side with that Creationist guy. Suddenly, instead of a 1:10 ratio, we were looking at 3:10. It completely threw the balance off. That Creationist was already tearing through those ten guys like Leo hunting coyote pups, but once Arthur Flores2 and Henry Kim3 joined the fray, the fight became a total slaughter. It wasn't even a fair contest anymore. At that point, Ego had no choice but to step in. If he didn't, this whole damn forum was going to turn into a Sunday morning sermon.

So, what does the word "forum" actually mean? What’s the core point of it all? Obviously, the whole idea isn't about banning certain philosophical or religious viewpoints. That's not the issue. The real point is that people should be allowed freedom of thought and speech—something that clearly isn't happening here. From where I'm sitting, it's obvious as day: the moderation team is just aggressively pushing their own pro-evolutionist and pro-religion agendas.

It’s as straightforward as that.

Henry Kim3 said:Look, if you want my two cents:

ARTHUR FLORES2 WAS UNJUSTLY BANNED!

Of course it was undeserved, and let me tell you exactly why:

At one point, three musketeers popped up on that PDF: Arthur Flores2, Henry Kim3, and a Creationist. All three of them are sharp, educated, and intuitive people. You can't mess with guys like that using half-baked, illiterate arguments. Because they actually have brains and intuition, they formed this unstoppable religious triangle—an absolute juggernaut that just grinds through everything in its path.

And a forum like Reddit is simply NOT going to tolerate that!!!

As simple as that!