CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › brightheron64 › Posts

Posts by brightheron64

441 posts shown.

Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
steelfox98 said:A quick word on oil and those famous 5 million barrels from Biden:
Not long after the conflict kicked off and prices skyrocketed, the US started tapping into reserves at a rate of 1 million barrels a day, with a six-month plan in mind. In short, they’ve released about 100 million barrels so far. The real headache with this 5 million is that it was being shipped out of the US.
That supply helped stabilize things slightly, but I can't help but wonder what happens in three months. Winter is coming, stockpiles are depleted, and you can bet the Americans will be looking to refill them.

On natural gas:
In parts of Europe, they’re already starting to implement cuts, and we’re barely into July. People over there have already run the numbers on what happens to the German economy without gas—no point me repeating the grim math here.

So, it’s hardly surprising that nobody is even mentioning a seventh round of sanctions anymore, despite how loudly everyone cheered for them after the sixth.

Watching this whole oil circus unfold is going to be quite the spectacle to follow...

Looking at the projections for 2022, we're seeing Chinese daily imports hitting around 7.5 million barrels, while India is pulling in about 5 million... It’s expected that India will save billions of dollars every single year because Putin has already offered them such an irresistible price, even if it means the Russians continue to rake in massive amounts of cash...

SINGAPORE, June 20 (Reuters) — It looks like the landscape of global energy is shifting quite dramatically, as Chinese imports of crude oil from Russia surged by a staggering 55% compared to this time last year, hitting record highs this past May... This massive spike has actually pushed Saudi Arabia out of its top spot as the leading supplier, leaving domestic refineries in a position to reap significant profits from these redirected flows, all while navigating the complex fallout of sanctions imposed on Moscow following its invasion of Ukraine...
According to recent data released by the Chinese Customs Service, imports of Russian oil have hit nearly 8.42 million tons, factoring in everything from the steady flow through the East Siberia Pacific Ocean pipeline to various maritime shipments arriving from Russian ports across Europe and the Far East...
That brings us to roughly 1.98 million barrels per day, which is actually quite a significant jump when you consider we were sitting at just over 1.59 million barrels per day back in April...

NEW DELHI, July 8 (Reuters) — Ever since the conflict in Ukraine kicked off, the United States and its allies have been leaning heavily on other nations to scale back their purchases of Russian oil, all in an effort to hit Moscow where it hurts most for its aggression. However, Indian refineries have taken a completely different path, actually ramping up their intake of Russian crude oil instead... meanwhile, the government is now looking into various ways to shield its domestic oil companies from potential fallout if they ever find themselves caught in the crosshairs of international sanctions...
We're seeing a massive surge in supply coming straight out of Russia. Looking at the numbers, India was importing a staggering 819,000 barrels per day back in May, which is quite a leap from the 277,000 barrels per day they saw in April, and an even more dramatic jump from just 33,000 barrels per day a year ago... It turns out Russia has officially stepped up to become India's second-largest supplier, actually overtaking Saudi Arabia in the process, though Iraq still holds onto that top spot...

Where are all the other heavy hitters, though? I’m thinking about those smaller players who are basically teetering on the edge of total bankruptcy... take Pakistan, for example, which is practically broke right now... especially since the Chinese have just gone ahead and restructured $4 billion of their maturing debt...

The government over in Pakistan has officially reached out to its domestic refineries, asking for their input on whether importing Russian crude at those incredibly attractive price points might be a smart move to offset the rising costs of imports... It looks like they’re following suit with a growing list of Asian nations that are keeping their options wide open by looking toward suppliers outside of OPEC...
According to industry insiders and market analysts, if you look at the numbers on paper, sourcing oil from the Urals could potentially save Pakistani refineries at least $30 per barrel compared to what they’re paying for Middle Eastern crude...

"At the very best, if we were to shift 100% of our energy needs over to Russia and managed to snag a 30% discount on our total oil import bill, we'd be looking at annual savings of about $6 billion," noted unnamed from Pearl Securities.

So, when all is said and done, who is actually going to end up being the "matchstick" in this oil war? Good old Europe, most likely...
I’m sitting here impatiently waiting for the announcements from the administration and the new Secretary of the Treasury in ten days. Is Eurosuper still going to be $4.50?

Our only real glimmer of hope is that sanctions on Iran and Venezuela might finally be lifted, though it will certainly take some time before Venezuela can really get back up to full speed...
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
George Robinson43 said:Which Taliban from 40 years ago? What are you even talking about?
You are confusing the mujahideen with the Taliban. One group actually took down the first, while the first took down the communists.
And where did you get the idea that the Taliban didn't have access to Russian unknowns, Chinese HN-5s, or even old Soviet ZPU-1s and ZU-23s?

I'm not confusing anything at all, but let's just clear up what you're actually saying here: are you suggesting the mujahideen were literate while the Taliban weren't?

George Robinson43 said:With what?
AK-47s and Russian RPGs? The Taliban had those lying around by the truckload!
If you're suggesting they needed ballistic missiles, S-400s, Sukhoi jets, and things of that nature—fine. But are uneducated shepherds really capable of operating hardware like that?


Anthony Hill5 said:Everything you're writing here is just nonsense peddled daily by Mearsheimer, who completely ignores Putin's essay and speeches where he denies the very existence of Ukraine and the Ukrainian identity...

For the hundredth time, this has nothing to do with NATO, so I have no idea what "trinity" you think you're talking about... perhaps NATO was supposed to explain to Ukrainians that they aren't really Ukrainian and don't have a right to exist outside of Russia...

The claim that Americans are fighting a proxy war until the very last Ukrainian is just incredibly worn-out, degenerate Russian propaganda...

I honestly don't see how the Russians could fail to view the accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO as a threat... Mearsheimer didn't explain it, so I doubt you will either...

Ah, look how worked up we've all gotten... It's a shame it's Sunday...

Anyway, I promise I won't bother annoying you any further until tomorrow afternoon...
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
hollowdriver13 said:Classic Gojko Drljac post here; total clickbait vibes, like "You won't believe what they're hiding from you! Click to find out!"

The article completely ignores the fact that crude oil prices have been dropping for over 30 days straight. Plus, gas and diesel prices at the pumps across the US are falling, with the national average sliding below $3.50 per gallon—the lowest we've seen since $3.12.

So, July 4th has come and gone. 😉

07:45 am CDT 10/07/2022
WTI Crude(August Contract)
104.79 +2.01%

https://oilprice.com/oil-price-charts/

But what about fuel costs? Are we looking at the same data source?... 🤔

Today’s AAA National Average
$4.684
Price as of 7/10/22

https://gasprices.aaa.com/
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
George Robinson43 said:With what?
AK-47s and Russian RPGs? The Taliban had those lying around by the truckload!
If you're suggesting they needed ballistic missiles, S-400s, Sukhoi jets, and things of that nature—fine. But are uneducated shepherds really capable of operating hardware like that?

With what? Well, even just having access to Kornet missiles and Igla systems would be more than enough for them... If they could manage to learn how to use Stingers and Blowpipes back in the day, surely they could master Kornet and Igla technology now.

Even if we assume the Houthis are slightly more "sophisticated" than your average shepherd, you see how quickly things change when they actually have the right equipment in their hands... It’s quite a predicament when you find yourself needing Patriot missiles to defend against people wearing sandals...

The Missile War in Yemen
https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep24837
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Melissa Rivera5 said:Yeah, pretty much. You're basically saying, "Hey, we hit all our goals for this special operation, so we're heading home." I mean, how do you actually think NATO could *stop* this war right now? Even if they did jump in on Russia's side, it wouldn't be an instant fix.

I don't know, that answer feels totally disconnected from the whole "proxy war" argument. Putin isn't pushing a proxy war—he's just pushing a war because he wants one. If he hadn't kicked off this "special operation" in the first place, there wouldn't even be a so-called proxy war to talk about.

Let's be clear: Putin isn't fighting a proxy war in Ukraine—unless you want to buy into the nonsense about "defending threatened Russian minorities"—he is leading an outright, completely irrational, and totally unnecessary invasion. Honestly, if there were any sense left in him, he should have pulled back after his initial attempt to seize the capital fell apart...

But hey, let's move past where this all started and try to figure out how it actually ends...
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
silentnomad7 said:We're looking at a transition that could stretch out for 20 to 30 years, so we really need to see where things land two or three decades down the road... In the meantime, both China and India are reaping the benefits of that cheaper oil; honestly, they'd be fools not to take advantage of such a massive opportunity while it's right there in front of them.

Well, that sounds just wonderful.

The only problem is I don't plan on being around to watch the fireworks from the front row...

Melissa Rivera5 said:Wait, so you think NATO is to blame for everything—that they opened the door and are now blocking any chance of immediate peace? Do you seriously think NATO is powerful enough to just *guarantee* peace right this second? Honestly, the only one who can do that is Vladimir Putin, whenever he feels like it, simply by stopping the aggression. He started this, so he's the one who can end it instantly. And if you ask me, the only person really pushing this whole proxy war thing is Vladimir Putin himself. I mean, why would anyone force a peace deal that basically results in Ukraine getting wrecked? It sounds to me like you're implying we should just force a Russian victory to get some peace.

And how exactly would that work?
Are we talking about him saying, "We're bored now, let's call it quits," while keeping everything else exactly as it is under the status quo?
Or is he going to hand back everything, including Crimea?

Melissa Rivera5 said:Wait, so you think NATO is to blame for everything—that they opened the door and are now blocking any chance of immediate peace? Do you seriously think NATO is powerful enough to just *guarantee* peace right this second? Honestly, the only one who can do that is Vladimir Putin, whenever he feels like it, simply by stopping the aggression. He started this, so he's the one who can end it instantly. And if you ask me, the only person really pushing this whole proxy war thing is Vladimir Putin himself. I mean, why would anyone force a peace deal that basically results in Ukraine getting wrecked? It sounds to me like you're implying we should just force a Russian victory to get some peace.

If that's the case, why hasn't Putin been arming the Taliban to the teeth—if only as payback for that whole Soviet adventure back in the eighties and all that outside interference?
Why hasn't he sent the Iranians a full catalog with special pricing? You know, maybe an Onyx free with their first Patriot missile system purchase, followed by a 10 to 15 percent discount on the next ten...
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
silentnomad7 said:From what I can see, it looks like they sold that same nonsense to China as well.

Oh, they certainly did—both the Chinese and the Indians...

The reality is simply that we're looking at cheap Russian oil imports.

The way the Indian people describe the solution is almost philosophical in its simplicity:
"If India stops buying oil from Russia, the entire world will be chasing the same pieces of oil and that will further push up oil prices"
Analysts at Goldman Sachs say for every $ 1 increase in the price of oil, India’s import bill increases by $2.1 billion.
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Christian Torres3 said:Not exactly thrilled about it, but yeah—they'll give it back.

I'd really appreciate it if you could walk me through the math or just clarify the equation you're using to arrive at a result like that. 😉
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Melissa Rivera5 said:Honestly, the US wouldn't even keep Saudi Arabia around if it wasn't for all that oil. And as for being "consistent"... I don't get why everyone's so quick to blame Europe or the US when the USSR and Russia have been doing the exact same stuff for ages. Nobody is perfectly consistent; everyone's just looking out for their own interests, I guess. I mean, damn, Putler went on a war footing and started pulling massive bullshit moves, basically flirting with WW3. What were we supposed to do? Just sit there and watch him, kind of like how people watched Hitler take over one country after another?

It’s true that Putin set his sights on war, but... (there goes the classic whataboutism) if the CIA really knew everything they claim to know, then they should have reacted much earlier and much more aggressively—something like, "Hold on, let's negotiate a 'Ménage à trois'," because no single life, whether Ukrainian or Russian, is worth this level of warfare and chaos. Instead, we are currently rolling out every possible sanction imaginable (all at once, rather than step-by-step), yet not a single drop of Russian oil or cubic meter of gas isn't finding its way to a destination somewhere.

It feels like a twisted kind of gymnastics, almost perverse, watching the endless talk about tens of thousands of deaths, the destruction, and the devastation... not to mention the economic fallout. Honestly, why didn't the EU simply say, "we are shutting down every single pipeline this very second, even if it kills us"? Even Ukraine, which is the one under direct attack, is still allowing Russian energy to transit through its territory, essentially collecting the cash from it...
Good grief, we aren't the Japanese, so why are we acting like kamikazes?

Man, even Domazet Lošo would have passed out looking at all of this...

It is fair to ask who actually threw the doors wide open for Putin to embark on this war adventure, and who is now trying to fix it with such desperation at the cost of tens of thousands of souls, misery, and hardship. Is someone truly invested in peace and reaching a solution right now (even if it doesn't favor Ukraine), or is a proxy war of attrition against the Russians actually more interesting to them, even if it drags on for years?
And in the end, what is the actual resolution? Are the Russians just going to hand back Crimea and Donbas?
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Anthony Hill5 said:Was Pinochet considered a threat to American security, or are you simply drawing parallels where none exist?

On a side note, how exactly do you envision someone "pacifying" Putin?
Will they corner him in some dark alleyway, or perhaps orchestrate a coup d'état? Is he destined to receive a "lesson" similar to what befell Saddam or Gaddafi?

I have no such illusions. At the onset of this conflict, I stated quite clearly that I did not expect Putin to be dethroned; however, I am fully aware that as long as he remains at the helm of Russia, there will be no possibility of repairing relations or achieving a diplomatic reset.

Not quite, I’m simply trying to illustrate the sheer consistency of international policy and this concept of "democracy" we talk so much about...

Let’s be honest here, if Saudi Arabia didn't hold the keys to the world's oil supply, nobody would give them the time of day, let alone go out of their way to maintain such tight diplomatic ties and strategic alliances...
Just look at Africa—sure, it's a complete powder keg of instability, but you won't find a lack of dictators, oligarchs, or political parasites there, yet the raw materials continue to flow out steadily... we just play at being peacekeepers, and that’s really all there is to it...
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Anthony Hill5 said:Germany was once a defeated nation, subjected to total demilitarization and pacification.

Only when a similar transformation occurs in Russia can we truly discuss Franco-German relations and project those dynamics onto the West-Russia situation.

As long as this militaristic, fascist regime remains in power in Russia, any meaningful improvement in relations between the two sides remains an impossibility.

Who exactly is this "we"? You and me? I appreciate the sentiment, really, but politics operates on an entirely different level.

Didn't Margaret Thatcher publicly praise Pinochet by saying, "It was you who brought democracy to Chile."?
That’s enough said about being morally outraged by fascist regimes, because if we look at the reality of it: "I know how much we owe to you for your help during the Falklands campaign".

In short, once someone truly secures their seat of power and calculates exactly what they stand to gain or lose... all those lofty notions of "righteousness" tend to just wash away...

By the way, how exactly do you imagine anyone is going to "pacify" Putin?
Are they going to corner him in some dark alleyway, or perhaps orchestrate a coup d'état? Is he destined to receive a "lesson" similar to what Saddam or Gaddafi went through?
Has anyone even considered the possibility that Putin's successor might be someone even more rigid? Unfortunately, the tree that grows various versions of Stalin hasn't exactly withered away yet...

silentnomad7 said:The European Union is pivoting toward alternative energy sources, so Russia will never again be a significant energy factor for the EU.

Let me try to simplify this for you... maybe it'll make things a bit clearer.
Think about the islands off the coast of Florida; they rely on water and electricity supplied from the mainland via underwater cables.

Of course, there are alternative ways to supply them—things like aquifers, desalination plants, wind turbines, or solar arrays... but, for heaven's sake, they aren't doing that. Why?
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
rowdytiger13 As Jack Hill2 says...
But honestly, I’m having a hard time seeing where the contradiction even lies...
Germany's reliance on Russian gas has become quite a significant issue, though it’s funny to think about how it wasn't even viewed as much of a problem back in the day... especially when everything seemed focused on pushing projects like Nord Stream forward. It feels like what used to be an accidental dependency has now shifted into a deliberate policy objective, where the entire goal is to decouple from Russian energy sources as swiftly as humanly possible... and current forecasts suggest it might take about two years to fully pull it off...
If the war were to grind to a halt right this second, nothing would actually change... Even if Russia were to step back, the fact remains that they’ve already managed to shake the very foundations of the German economy, not to mention the broader European market as well...
Whatever they managed to catch, they've already caught it... In any case, Russian gas supplies are bound to dwindle down to almost nothing...

Well, I suppose we’ll just have to wait and see if it all actually plays out the way they say...

Are you honestly suggesting that Germany and the rest of Europe can solve their dependency issues just by cutting Russian gas supplies down to zero? It feels a bit like saying, "I'm done buying cocaine from Colombians, so now I'll just get it from Peruvians instead"... which doesn't really change the situation much, does it? Unless, of course, they happen to stumble upon a breakthrough in controlled fusion or a viable hydrogen engine in the meantime... 🤣

Ultimately, this war will reach its conclusion just like any other conflict before it, whenever that may be... Once the dust finally settles, the powers that be will simply reshuffle the deck and draft entirely new agreements, especially since the underlying infrastructure is already firmly in place...

Just a quick little reflection on our "life teacher" here... looking at the relationship between France and Germany, both back then and even today. I don't want to go too far afield, but let's start with the Napoleonic Wars...
The Peace of Tilsit represents such a pivotal moment in history, marking that monumental peace treaty signed between France and Russia, as well as between France and Prussia, back on July 9, 1807... It effectively brought an end to the intense conflict between France and Russia, which had been fighting alongside the Fourth Coalition—comprising the United Kingdom, Russia, Prussia, and Sweden—against the forces of Napoleon I. Bonaparte. This whole arrangement was ultimately driven by the influence of the Russian Tsar, Alexander I, following the devastating defeat at the Battle of Friedland (which we know today as Pravdinsk) on June 14, 1807. Under the specific terms laid out in this peace agreement, Prussia suffered significant losses, surrendering the territory situated between the Rhine and the Elbe, along with all the Polish lands they had managed to acquire during the First and Second Partitions of Poland...

Should I even bother recounting the much more brutal clashes between those nations over the next 140 years... because just look at the world we live in today—it turns out Germans and the French are actually the very foundation of a unified Europe...

Those were different times altogether, an era when everything felt far less interconnected than it does now, whereas today, everything moves at such a breakneck pace that nobody has the luxury—or frankly, the capital—to waste time chasing shadows... The moment some contract gets signed, suddenly there's a sudden influx of Russian gas and oil ready to roll, because, let's face it, money doesn't have a scent, even when it’s undeniably dirty and reeks of corruption...

Let’s be perfectly clear here—this isn't some kind of obsession with Russia, but rather a genuine attempt to look at the facts as they actually stand, all while poking a bit of fun at this much-touted "resolve" and "unified action" that everyone keeps preaching about...
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
mellowsurfer14 said:Canada relents

Canada is set to approve the lifting of sanctions regarding the return of repaired Russian turbines to Germany, which are essential for keeping the Nord Stream 1 pipeline operational, according to an announcement from the Canadian Minister of Natural Resources.

https://hr.n1info.com/biznis/kanada-...vernog-toka-1/

I really feel like we should have made that a bit more noticeable... 😁

Canada: We’re bringing the Nord Stream 1 turbines back online, and frankly, the Germans are going to find themselves shivering without that gas supply...

I’m not just saying this for the sake of hearing my own voice, but honestly, this really is one of the most entertaining corners of Foruma.hr... 🎉
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Nancy Gomez26 said:Of course fuel costs have risen—that's visible to anyone with eyes. But once you take a moment to look at what the refinery price actually is versus how much the government slaps on top of it, the reality hits home. You quickly realize how much of this is a genuine production spike and how much is just the state aggressively padding its pockets through these increases. The federal budget is the primary beneficiary here, pulling in far more from these hikes than the refiners ever see. And they show no intention of curbing their appetite.

“Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country!”
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jack Hill2 said:And I'm not just talking to you, but speaking generally here. This is easily the hundredth time someone shares a link in one context, only for me to click it and find something entirely different. Then you go to Google and realize the article itself was biased from the start, leaving out key facts, denials, and everything else...

Honestly, I can click a link and already know it's garbage.

That’s why I mostly stick to those more "unconventional" outlets like The New York Times, The Express Tribune, or The Jakarta Post... media sources that feel a bit more "offline" from the mainstream hype.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/
https://tribune.com.pk/
https://www.thejakartapost.com/

As for Associated Press, Bloomberg, CNN, Fox News, or even Index (along with our "beloved" Tucker and Stošić)... they’re really just great sources for finding something to laugh about... 😁

Melissa Rivera5 said:It’s all fun and games until you try driving an old Opel through Imotski!

No, I mean a Toyota Prius
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Jack Hill2 said:The article you linked clearly states they can't increase capacity for at least six months, not that they lack the ability entirely. Those countries shot down those claims immediately, noting that what they told Emmanuel Macron was that they couldn't hike production instantly due to the OPEC+ agreement expiring at the end of the year. So, it isn't even a technical limitation on production; they are simply honoring the existing production quotas...

I don't understand why you insist on feeding us nothing but half-truths and completely twisted contexts.

It's foolish, truly foolish. If you're going to share something with this forum, at least put in some effort.

You're linking a junk headline that implies Middle Eastern countries lack sufficient production capacity. In reality:
1. They have enough capacity and could increase it right now.
2. They are currently respecting the OPEC+ agreement, which expires in 4-5 months. To boost production immediately, they would just need a new agreement.

Think about it for a second, and you'll realize I'm right. There is no point in serving news the way you are. People see these junk headlines when browsing portals on their own; if you're going to post them here, you should provide meaningful context and the full story, not just clickbait.

First of all, most of this "news" is pure garbage—nothing more than blatant propaganda.

Secondly, you can sing your battle songs all you want and pin all your hopes on headlines and posts suggesting that someone can just stick a pipe in the ground in Saudi Arabia and watch the oil flow... but everyone seems to be ignoring the massive "shit happens" variable. We're talking about everything from random accidents, like an explosion at an LPG plant in Freeport, to malicious actors like the Iranians who might goad the Houthis into hitting Saudi oil facilities. What lies ahead for us... well, even Vanga wouldn't know (and she’d probably be kicked out of Saudi Arabia for her fortune-telling)... but it’s certainly interesting to see some people still feeling so incredibly secure and carefree...

As for the bickering on this forum, I find it all rather entertaining, which is exactly why I’m spending my weekend servicing three bicycles that have been rotting in my basement for years... 😉

And just try imagining what it's like trying to ride a bike in San Diego. Especially when you're pushing 220 pounds or more... 😬
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Anthony Hill5 said:The article explicitly states that Saudi Arabia has the capacity to bump production from 10.5 million barrels per day to 12.5 million.

As for the United Arab Emirates, they can manage an additional 400,000 to a million.

The EU imports 2 million barrels per day from Russia. Therefore, Saudi Arabia alone can replace exactly what is needed.

Quote : Europe was The destination for nearly half of Russia's crude and petroleum product exports before Russia's invasion of Ukraine, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

The EU imported 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude in 2021, including 0.7 million bpd via pipeline.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/comm...%20of%20diesel.

If anyone actually understands the true production capacities of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, it is the Americans.

If you dig just a little bit deeper (check Reuters)...

"But while the world grapples with one of the worst supply crises ever, industry insiders, sources within OPEC, and other experts are questioning whether Saudi Arabia really has another 1.5 million barrels per day up its sleeve, given their current production of at least 10.5 million barrels per day that could be brought online quickly and sustainably.

Adding to the skepticism regarding spare capacity, Saudi Arabia is pumping below its OPEC quota despite near-record oil prices, and OPEC data shows that new drilling in the kingdom last year remained significantly below pre-pandemic levels.

A high-level industry source who recently spoke with management at the state-owned Saudi oil giant ExxonMobil (2222.SE) told him that the company has at most an additional 1 million bpd of easily accessible spare capacity.

"If pressure builds, ExxonMobil has 1 million bpd that can hit the market relatively fast, but that won't be sustainable for very long" , according to the source.

At the time of the meeting, ExxonMobil was producing 10.5 million bpd, which implies their production couldn't jump past 11.5 million bpd. The source declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter.

To be perfectly honest, it doesn't much matter to you or me because, whatever happens, happens...

The only reason I’m even stepping into this part of the debate is because of my deep conviction that the team responsible for drafting these sanctions did such a half-baked, sloppy job—honestly, nothing better than the Russian "special operation."
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
It’s finally happening, I suppose...

The Russian version of McDonald's has already run out of French fries
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
Anthony Hill5 said:The US President clearly possesses more insight than the Americans do. Honestly, stop trying to muddy the waters.🤣

Well, it seems someone is a bit out of the loop here...

(Saint-Cloud, USA, April 19th, 2022) – Today, we received the first down payment of the contract for the acquisition of 80 Rafale by the United Arab Emirates.

What exactly is flying in the US Air Force?

Maybe if you found the news hard to believe, you should just stop reading the Associated Press?

Macron tells Biden that UAE, Saudi can barely raise oil output
Feb 28, 2022. — Two top OPEC oil producers, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, can barely increase oil production, US President Emmanuel Macron ...

https://www.reuters.com/world/macron...ut-2022-06-27/
Sanctions on Russia in War in Ukraine ·
George Robinson43 said:To put things in perspective, 5,000,000 barrels represents a staggering 40% of the total daily oil production in the USA!
To be more precise, they moved 5 million barrels in just ten hours!

I mean, fine, but if that's the case, why all the constant complaining about our strategic reserves running thin?...

It seems like oil used to be the primary driver behind international conflicts, but now we've reached a point where it's causing friction right here at home...

rowdyraven112 said:Of course prices dropped once those 5 million barrels hit the market. My earlier point remains: why would other OPEC members play ball with Europe and the US?

Even reading this—taking the sources with a grain of salt—I can basically thank Putin. By invading Ukraine, he proved exactly how vulnerable the EU is. I'm seeing reports from various nations and the European Council about needing to "reduce dependence on Russian energy"... but there's a logical flaw here. What happens if the countries Europe turns to end up in the same spot as Russia? Let's face it: Saudi Arabia is fighting an open war against Yemen. ☕

And look, prices have already jumped back up today...🙄

Relying on Saudi Arabia and the UAE to act like some kind of guardian angel coming to save us from this volatility... well, I think someone might have miscalculated there. With Biden heading over there next week, he really needs to dig into what's actually happening—whether they truly can't increase production or if they simply won't... Apparently, Macron already mentioned to him that the Saudis have very little spare capacity left, which caught him quite off guard...