Posts by Terry Bennett

I actually think this version hits harder than the original; it’s way more entertaining.
But just like every other Hollywood production these days, it's still cluttered with Woke propaganda.

Peter Diaz3 said:I have to disagree. If we are talking about the "cream of the crop," we are looking at a man between 37 and 42 years old. He needs to be physically very attractive to most women, which implies he should be tall—let's say 6'3" or taller. He must be well-built with broad shoulders, a fit physique, and impeccable grooming. Just on those points alone, the percentage drops significantly; you're already down to the top 30%. Most men in that age bracket look quite neglected. You know this is true; you see it for yourself when you observe people at a beach in California. Forget the winter months when everyone is bundled up in heavy coats; the beach reveals everything. Furthermore, if you want someone who possesses confidence, a strong presence, intellect, and charm, that percentage plummets even further. Now we are down to your 15%. But if you truly want a "catch" in every sense of the word, women are invariably drawn to men who possess power. Social power—men who are influential. To achieve that, one typically needs a certain status, perhaps serving as a CEO of a major corporation or holding a high-level management position. Such individuals are incredibly rare, which is why I referred to the top 1%.

What are you guys talking about? What 1%?
There isn't even a 1% of men over 6'3", especially once they hit middle age.
When you factor in all those other requirements, we aren't even talking about 1 percent. We're nowhere near it.

"But she won't settle for anything less; she deserves someone like that," she read in Gloria.
... meanwhile, she can't even fry an egg.🤦

Sean Kern2 said:Can someone please point out where I actually called her an angel? You don't need to be some NASA rocket scientist to see the girl is just incredibly naive. Besides, I’m not about to go out of my way to kick someone while they're down, regardless of gender—I've got at least a little bit of class left.😉

The real issue is that she's been tied to this guy since she was twenty-one, and he's spent four years conditioning her through sex. You want to talk about that?🙂

The problem is definitely that self-proclaimed predator; everything we're reading from her perspective is just the aftermath of being with him.

She’s just a poor soul who got used, and he’s a total pig...
Can we please stop with the victim playing the moment things don't go your way?

gentlestag3 said:So, he’s turning forty soon, and she’s just there worrying that he’ll end up all alone and miserable ☕ 😬

A guy in his 40s is anything but lonely or pathetic.👍

Only a 19-year-old Taylor Swift has better odds than a successful 40-year-old.

William Sanders6 said:What are you even talking about? A relationship implies exclusivity and commitment, which is clearly not what this guy wants.

My advice to the author: walk away. But don't do it as a tactic to make him chase you; do it as a way to find yourself again.
He isn't going to change. If he actually had real feelings for you, he’d want you all to himself. The truth is, he just doesn't care. You don't mean much to him, so please, stop hurting yourself and find someone who actually deserves you.

What do you mean by that? What kind of "commitment" are we talking about here?
Is that actually written in some legal code somewhere?
.
What does everyone mean when they say she wasted four years of her life?
Was she forced into something?
Did this guy make her some sort of promise?

Or did she just blow four years trying to land someone who would provide for her kids and handle all the bills,
and now she's just complaining because her investment didn't pay off?