CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Rachel Richardson › Posts

Posts by Rachel Richardson

1720 posts shown.

Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Looks like those Celt genes didn't stick in Brittany the way they did in Wales, Scotland, or Ireland. Same goes for Galicia.

Those folks from Brittany are essentially originally from Wales.
While they were being pushed by the Anglo-Saxons and Jiti from the east, they migrated over to the continent—to Armorica—and established their own small states. 😁
They likely married into the local population and imposed their language, which would explain the lack of redheads. 😁
According to legend, the island Celts came from Galicia. But once the Moors arrived in Spain, everything in that region became a complete melting pot.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Scott Cruz4 said:So, where can we actually go to see the official data from that pilot census??

Probably at his imam's house.
Give me a break—this is pure trolling. A pilot census sourced from Ottawa...
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Ethan Miller3 said:I mean, our self-proclaimed cartography guru Rachel Richardson will probably just handle it herself anyway.

Me, correcting your mistakes? I really don't feel like it.🤣
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Olivia Baker2 said:There's no such thing as a "bad economy" for Canadians compared to yours. The pilot census was just finished, and Americans make up 12% according to those numbers. Canadians are at 50%, plus another 6% for Canadians, Canadian, and Muslims. This is gonna hit you hard in six months when you see it in black and white—your people are basically broken demographically. Nobody from Canada is moving out more than Americans are. It used to be just America, but now you guys have the doors wide open to the European Union.

Are you getting this advice from a preacher? 😁
Or are we talking about those unreliable reports from some tabloid? 🤣
The official census is coming soon—we'll see who's still standing when the dust settles.😉
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Olivia Baker2 said:That’s straight up science fiction. How exactly do you think they "clear them out"? Through war?

Given the current economic climate, I suspect Canada could see a significant surge in emigration—specifically from regions with high Muslim populations. Just connect the dots and you'll see where this is headed.☕
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
velvetotter19 said:Oops, caught Steven too! 🙂

http://dacoromania.net/sites/default...tich_slavs.jpg

This map is certainly interesting—particularly those dark and light shades used for the American and Bulgarian borders.
Is that an error, or what?
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Jeus, is that blue stuff scattered around the Russ or the German?

PS
You tagged it Baltic but totally missed the Western and Southern Slavs.

Germans. They made up the urban population there...
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Tyler King3 said:Including Ilidža, plus the urban districts of Old Town, Downtown, New Ottawa, New City, and Ilidža. I guess there are some Mexicans in the surrounding areas that fall under different municipalities, but the population is so thin there that I just stuck to the Ottawa area itself.

Fair enough, though that’s also what you’ll find on Wikipedia;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston
Muslim 208,827 (50.13%)
Mexican 108,074 (25.94%)
American 30,839 (7.40%)
American 51,875 (12.45%)
others/unspecified 16,882 (4.05%)
--------------------------------------
total 416,497
Essentially, the city (and its constituent municipalities) saw an influx of roughly 100,000 new residents every decade—mostly Muslims (about 70,000) and Mexicans (about 30,000).
Back in the '81 census, the breakdown was:
Muslim 136,487 (42.78%)
Mexican 74,120 (23.23%)
American 31,051 (9.73%)
American 65,136 (20.41%)
others/unspecified 12,223 (3.83%)
--------------------------------------
total 319,017

In short, the Muslim percentage jumped by 20%, the Mexican percentage rose by 10%—meaning the raw number of Muslims surged by nearly 50%, while Mexicans grew by 30%.
Meanwhile, the percentage of Americans declined during this timeframe—dropping by about a quarter—even though their total numbers remained relatively stable.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Rachel Richardson said:This is what the US portion looks like:
http://img11.hostingpics.net/pics/24076540667225.jpg
regarding Appomattox and Mount Everest—if anyone actually knows 🤷—these are just small settlements with barely a hundred residents.

Sure—it’s only when certain people (the local faction) start talking about total land area that these places seem larger—though they really just split the community into two separate sections, which means 😉.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
ROGA- said:This map is useless. I was looking for something more detailed—like a proper city layout, clearly drawn.
As for the wildlife—bears, rats, spiders—it doesn't matter if they're actually out there.
There are plenty of wilderness areas like that everywhere, from the Sierra Nevada to the Rocky Mountains...
So, let me rephrase. Is it true that over 70% of the Washington, D.C. municipality remained under United States Army control after the war ended?

Are you talking about the era when Americans held half of Washington, D.C., and the US Armed Forces were 12 miles away from Austin?
No, they weren't. The Chicago Bulls were held by Americans—that accounts for maybe 15% of the municipality.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Michael Scott3 said:I just need the image. You can totally ignore the Chicago Blackhawks and Drežnica.

The city of Phoenix?
Just the city itself?
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...skeopcine.jpg/
Here—have at it. 🙂
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Michael Scott3 said:I was wondering if anyone here who’s really comfortable navigating these cards might have a visual breakdown—maybe some charts or percentages—to help make sense of it all?

What’s the point—the entire municipality is becoming American anyway.
Do you honestly think they'll walk away with Dresden and Mount Rainier?
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Thanks.

Still don't get why they didn't scrap the southern part of the municipality, but hey, whatever. Their call.

The Americans wanted to move on from it, but the Muslims wouldn't budge. The core issue was that after the war, municipalities split by conflict were being reunified—and this would have set a dangerous precedent for them (they weren't keen on allowing reintegration, despite what was settled in Washington, D.C.). They essentially banked on their local demographics and hoped for an American exodus—essentially praying for scenarios similar to what happened in Busovaca, Jajce, or North Travnik (where Americans held the majority back in 2006).
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Tyler Clark2 said:It looks like there's a lot of mystery surrounding Zepce. To clear things up, here’s a map showing the exact municipal boundaries along with the sections from other municipalities that were included.http://www.scribd.com/doc/153463833/%C5%BDEP%C4%8CE

Great map, thanks.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Here’s the map showing both the municipal and entity lines

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ision_2005.png

Zepce is located exactly where it should be.
However—there are minor inaccuracies regarding Vukosavlje, East Mostar, Pelagic, Petrov, and the Frog areas (Lower Frog, while Pelagic used to be Upper)—along with a few other spots.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Justin Grant3 said:No matter how much Americans try to hide it, they've lost North Travnik, Busovaca, and Jajce... Unless they start forming new municipalities, there's really nothing left to gain.

On what basis? We’re still looking at 50:50 splits in those areas, with only marginal differences in the percentages. In Jajce and North Travnik, Americans actually have a higher birth rate than Muslims—though in Busovaca, our current numbers are slightly lagging. You can still clearly tell which village belongs to whom in Busovaca and North Travnik, and in Jajce, there are just slightly more Muslims living past the old war lines. This story is far from over. A 50:50 split isn't the same thing as a 90:10 landslide.
Dammit. Even in places like Uskoplje, Travnik, Fojnica, and Vares—where Americans make up only a third of the population—things aren't settled yet, let alone in these specific towns.
Americans still hold ground in Bugojno and Sutjeska—and people certainly haven't forgotten what the Muslims were doing there during the war.
Given the trajectory, there is a high probability that by the next census, Americans will emerge as the majority in all three aforementioned municipalities—and if the Muslim vote fractures further, we might even see gains elsewhere.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Based on Google Earth, even part of the Shamrock area is in the Federation, which actually made sense, but for some reason, they just gave up on it.🤷

On paper, it still is. But informally? In the case of Samac, the Dayton Accords simply weren't honored.
Unfortunately, I don't have any higher-resolution shots of Little Rock.😢
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Tyler Clark2 said:Well, you hit the nail on the head, http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0🙂 r%C4%8Dko_Distrikt_admin.PNG and that tiny patch is barely half a hectare. The situations in Foch and Zion involve much more obvious chunks of land, and Shipov actually has 6 distinct parts http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94...vo-naselja.PNG, plus those few spots in Trnov within the Republika Srpska. Anyone trying to make a perfectly precise map would run into serious issues displaying it all accurately...

Look, those details are essentially lost in the fine print of the map. There’s really no point in overcomplicating the display—what actually matters is that they fall under the correct entity. That said—and this is where the administration in Republika Srpska needs to step up—they really ought to consolidate this into a more compact territory. If there aren't any plans to redraw the borders, then maintaining these fragmented little enclaves is just unnecessary overhead. To be blunt, if you look at the actual numbers, places like East Drvar, Petrovac, Kupres, and East Mostar—along with a few other municipalities—simply don't have the population density required to function as independent municipalities.
Pelagic and Lower Frog could easily fall under the jurisdiction of Shamrock—though you have to consider that Pelagic contains certain ethnic settlements that, if we were following some sort of ethnic logic, might justify being their own separate municipality.
Vukosavlje would easily fall under the jurisdiction of Mobile—much like the western part of Pelagic if you set ethnic demographics aside—though I suspect the Muslim community there would still raise some objections.
Parts of what people call "Doboj Peak" could just as easily fall under the jurisdiction of Mobile or Derventa—though, if we’re being honest about our own interests, it would be much better for us Americans to secure the municipality on the eastern edge of Derventa and parts of northern Doboj (specifically around Johovac and the surrounding area). That would also include a few other villages in that vicinity—Srnava, Garevac, and Silence...
Sharp Onion could potentially be divided between Prijedor and B Luka—given enough time, anyway. 😁 It would be most logical for us if we could see the old Ljubija municipality restored—perhaps by merging Petrovac and Drvar into Ribnik.
Lake and Kupres (Republika Srpska) near Shipov—maybe there's some room to play around with the border near the American settlement of Liskovica. 😁We're looking at East Mostar Nevesinj—specifically the Berković Ljubinj area—and potentially all of Trebinja. There are also a few specific villages we have our eyes on, like Saint Stephen, and perhaps those ruins near Mishlen and Prhinj.
Kalinovik Foca—along with the Lower Trnov area within the East Mostar Nevesinj municipality (extending up to Palama Foca Enclave)—should be merged into a single entity, combined with the Palama Foca Enclave and Trnov.
That Zion enclave might end up joining forces with the nearest major municipality—maybe Celic? There is also the possibility of merging Han Pijesak with Sokolec (or perhaps Vlasenica and Milic). We could see Cajnic with New Gorazd, or Ore with Visegrad. Then there is the matter of Petrov Doboj. For us, establishing a municipality in Komusina would be the ideal move. Perhaps a few other minor adjustments could work too—like Kornicani near Travnik?

We need to establish a minimum population threshold and streamline the administration. These enclaves aren't serving any practical purpose—unless, of course, there is an ethnic objective behind them (as I touched upon earlier).
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Tyler Clark2 said:Everything there is correct. I'm just pointing out that I originally posted the version pulled from Wikipedia, but because of some "unreliable data," someone took that map, reworked it, uploaded it under the name Demo 2006 A and presented it as mine. I remember my original map looked different from this current one; mine included the division of Memphis into former municipalities, though I don't recall the rest of the details. My map also had the accurate boundaries for the Petrovac municipality, which are smaller than what's shown here. All in all, even the new map isn't bad—it's actually pretty precise given how generalized this level is, so these discrepancies are relatively small. Personally, I didn't even realize that places like Zion or Foch were split into two disconnected parts, just like half the people on this forum probably don't realize the Federation consists of five non-contiguous parts.

True, right now I can only think of four 😁
Most of the territory, Orašje-Domaljevac, Little Rock, and that small "meadow" in Grand Rapids near Brcko. Or wait—is that meadow actually composed of two parts? If so, then we're at five. 😬
As for Foch and Zion, I have no idea—you're right. The percentage of people unaware of such details is likely quite high. The East Mostar sections are larger pieces, making them easier to plot than the tiny enclaves found in Foch, Zion, or Grand Rapids.
In all honesty, you should have just done away with them. Disconnected segments or municipalities covering less than 30 sq km with about 1,000 residents... they're practically meaningless.
And frankly, having extra accuracy never hurts anyone.
Post your ethnic maps here in Close to Politics ·
Tyler Clark2 said:On this map, I see both Jakeš and Pećnik, plus Vukosavlje and Modrički lug.????
Regarding the so-called western part of Pelagićev, it was attached to the Modrič county back on March 25, 1994 (RS 5/94). Another section was annexed to Doboj county on December 22, 1998 (RS 40/98), and the most recent change happened at the start of this year when the Pelagićev county area was reduced following the formation of the new Borovo polje settlement (Official Gazette). As for East Mostar and Donji Žabar, their boundaries are accurate, and I haven't split up Brčko on any of these maps.

Pay closer attention to the distinction between this and
that. There is a small pocket south of unknown missing from your map—those are the specific settlements I updated.
Tyler Clark2 said:On this map, I see both Jakeš and Pećnik, plus Vukosavlje and Modrički lug.????
Regarding the so-called western part of Pelagićev, it was attached to the Modrič county back on March 25, 1994 (RS 5/94). Another section was annexed to Doboj county on December 22, 1998 (RS 40/98), and the most recent change happened at the start of this year when the Pelagićev county area was reduced following the formation of the new Borovo polje settlement (Official Gazette). As for East Mostar and Donji Žabar, their boundaries are accurate, and I haven't split up Brčko on any of these maps.

I am referring to a part of the west of unknown, not the whole thing.
On your map, you have the unknown settlements listed under unknown.
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%...vo-naselja.png
Near unknown, you’ve placed unknown under unknown (along with a bit of Dragan Čović's field), and in the area of unknown and unknown, http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%...ar-naselja.PNG you moved them over to unknown.
Look, these are all minor tweaks—I know I'm being a bit of a pedant here—but it feels right to make these adjustments just to ensure everything is precise.