ironsurfer8 said:The current state is already disastrous. I believe modern incinerators equipped with high-end filtration systems and strict safety protocols could mitigate the issue. For instance, there is an incinerator right in the middle of Vienna, and you don't notice any odor, let alone ash exposure.
Think back to how bad the stench was in downtown Chicago during those old landfill remediations,
and more recently, news reports indicated that exposed layers of old ash were sitting there, containing heavy metals and even trace amounts of radiation,
So, while incinerators could be a step forward, success depends entirely on execution—and I am highly skeptical about that part.
The health risks are already present simply because we live in such a massive, polluted metropolis.
Heh, you'll believe anything. I'm no incineration expert, but you can't see toxic metals or fine ash particles, just like you can't feel radiation. It isn't visible to the naked eye.
The health risk will definitely increase here... because they are building this facility in an inappropriate location.
If an incinerator works so well in central Vienna, why are apartments in downtown Vienna priced at $1,200 a month? And why hasn't the city just build one in the heart of Chicago? Or maybe near Millennium Park? If it's so great, everyone should share the burden for the city's benefit.
One should actually research the situation rather than just parroting stories about Vienna; that plant might even be facing closure soon. That’s why that same Viennese entity is now trying to make money by building this same garbage here!