feralangler82 said:I’m honestly spiraling a little bit after feeling this tiny lump—roughly the size of a small pea—near my anal opening a couple of days ago. I try to eat really healthy, I don't smoke, I don't drink, and my digestion is pretty much perfect. I'm 37, but the psychological stress from this is just eating me alive! Is it actually possible to develop hemorrhoids just from being incredibly stressed out? There’s no pain and no bleeding, which is a relief, but still... Can a hemorrhoid just go away on its own? Or is surgery basically the only way to deal with every single one?
From my own personal experience, once those external hemorrhoids pop out and decide to stay, you can maybe find some relief or even shrink them down by tweaking your diet and using certain medications. But—and this is a big but—they’re basically just waiting for one wrong move 🙂. For me personally, alcohol is the absolute worst; I mean, it's scary how much a single night of heavy drinking can make everything flare up in just one day. It's truly awful.
Can hemorrhoids actually cause narrow stools? For the last three months, I’ve been dealing with this constant itching—it’s honestly driving me crazy—and nothing seems to touch it, whether I try different creams or even taking pills?
Hey everyone, I was wondering—how would one go about handling a warranty claim (in a worst-case scenario, of course!) for graphics cards purchased through amazon com? It seems like quite a few of them are being sold with international warranties. My assumption is that only the actual owner of an amazon com account can utilize those, right? So, if I were looking at picking up a used card, how would that even work in practice? Would the seller need to hand over their amazon com login credentials to me or something?
Well, if you actually settled up before they even filed the motion for judgment, then you shouldn't be seeing any legal fees or notary costs at all—but I suppose that depends! Did you even receive a formal notice regarding the motion for judgment? I mean, what exactly was the basis for them pulling those funds from your account? If your residency is properly registered with the county, there should be a clear paper trail... I guess there are just so many moving parts to consider here! 🙂
Well, I have to say, I actually see things a bit differently—though, then again, I know Brandon Fox9 probably has a much better handle on the details than I do...
Hmm, I actually hadn't considered that perspective... does that imply the same logic applies to an enforcement proposal currently sitting with the Federal Reserve waiting to be collected?
Bryan Fowler42 said:Look, I get it—it seems totally contradictory... but I’m trying to wrap my head around how this actually works. Is PBS really considered a legal entity with public authority? And if so, would their payment orders count as an enforcement instrument subject to a 10-year statute of limitations?
Are you just bored and looking for a little friendly debate?
I just can't wrap my head around how an enforcement action—like, say, trying to collect on a judgment—would actually impact the statute of limitations. I’ve been digging through other areas of the law, like administrative or tax procedures, where the rules for when a statute of limitations kicks in are pretty clearly defined. For instance... well, you generally can't go after someone for an enforcement order once that five-year window has slammed shut. Period. Now, I know we aren't talking about the exact same set of laws here, but I'm just trying to draw some kind of parallel! It isn't like making a voluntary payment to reset the clock... though, then again, if you don't change the method of enforcement, I suppose the debtor would have to be the one to step up and request a stay. It feels like nobody is really checking on this as part of their official duties, right?
So, if a long-standing debt is being collected through the Federal Reserve, does that 10-year statute of limitations start running from the moment the promissory note is submitted, or does the fact that they're actively withholding funds affect that clock?
In other words, to prevent the debt from expiring (that 10-year mark), do you need to change the method of collection even if the Federal Reserve is already collecting, just because those 10 years are about to run out?
I'm a bit stuck on that last sentence in this link here:
"There is no statute of limitations for account freezing procedures carried out by the Federal Reserve."
Huh, well, that is actually a really good question! Personally, I would guess they probably have to—I mean, you can't exactly demand enforcement once that period has passed, though I suppose it's hard to say who is actually monitoring that... 🙂 I'm really not entirely sure myself...
Edward Price6 said:The topic is way too big for me to dive into alone, so if anyone has the scoop, I’d love to know: if a house has three owners and one of them is facing an enforcement order, how does that actually work? Can the Federal Reserve or whoever is handling the seizure do anything to a home where other people live who aren't under any enforcement order? How does that play out?
Well, it's possible... but I mean, who on earth is actually going to step up and buy a 1/3 share of a house?
I wonder, roughly how long does it take for the Federal Reserve to actually carry out a writ of execution once they get the request? — I mean, if there’s enough cash sitting in the account, maybe it could even happen the same day...
I really wanted to clarify a few things regarding networking and where the actual friction lies... so... look, I’m from a younger generation, and believe me when I say I would much rather gather all the data needed for a citizen's request—when we're talking about their rights and responsibilities—in a way that satisfies everyone involved, so that you aren't looking over my shoulder and I'm not looking over yours 🙂 but... there's the whole issue of privacy. We already have various programs for residential addresses and property records from the IRS... just so we can resolve a case internally without a client having to go on a "pilgrimage" through different agencies just to collect paperwork... and "vice versa," since clients have to provide those documents, proofs, and certifications anyway to exercise some right... so the question is: do you really want some "government bureaucrat"—as people like to call them—having access to your private data while you're just sitting at home? If you follow my drift, this is actually why everything moves so slowly... there are specific security protocols governing exactly how and when we can view a citizen's personal information... Or let's get practical: a client just needs to give their consent to allow access to their data for a specific procedure... they sign the form, and that's that... and honestly, I agree that the back-and-forth between agencies to request certain certificates is just ridiculous... death certificates, residency permits, documents related to inheritance law (like 🙂) and so on...
ps. In any case, it's happening... slowly but surely... 🙂
There’s this old saying from a certain Constitutional Court Justice: "In America, everyone speaks the same language when it comes to the law and football 🙂."
ps. And just to be clear—this isn't aimed at "Brandon Hill8"—though, honestly, I don't think I've ever encountered such incredible "legal breadth" before... it’s quite rare, I suppose, to find a lawyer who can offer expert advice across so many different fields at once! (Thanks again for the reply via PM, by the way!) 🙂
I assume you received one of those official notices where everything is laid out in detail—especially that specific part where they demand proof of payment... but from what I can gather, it seems like in some cases, maybe half the amount goes toward it, while in others, it’s closer to two-thirds...
Well, strictly speaking, the court handles all of those procedures officially—unless, of course, we're dealing with a case involving a death, in which case everything moves lightning fast... it’s pretty much instantaneous at that point...
The fact that someone was keeping such a close eye on the statute of limitations—honestly, it just goes to show that we probably don't need any more details from placidgull21 anyway!
placidgull21 said:So, I just got hit with a writ of execution based on a court judgment from all the way back in 2006. Since it’s been well over ten years since that ruling was handed down, I was wondering if there's any ground to appeal this based on the statute of limitations?
Here is what I managed to dig up through a quick Google search. "Claims established by a final court judgment or an order from a competent authority—including court settlements, agreements made before a relevant government body, or notarized documents—are subject to a ten-year statute of limitations, even if the law otherwise provides for a shorter period."
Well, you see—it’s not just about the broad strokes! One really has to account for the specific months and days that weren't mentioned in your initial breakdown—and, of course, there's the whole matter regarding the fact that there isn't such a thing as an absolute statute of limitations at the Zoo. I mean, even though those ten-year windows are relevant, one truly needs to interpret the expiration laws with a bit more nuance! Since you kept your explanation so brief—perhaps a little too brief, if I may say so—it's no wonder you received such a blunt response. 🙂
Jerry Robinson56 said:Could you elaborate on that? In my experience, the court doesn't bother checking if the statute of limitations has passed unless you explicitly raise the issue. And if you do enter into a debate about it, the statute of limitations is automatically waived. You can also initiate a counter-enforcement proceeding to get back what was wrongfully taken from you. However, recovering any other types of losses requires an entirely separate legal process....
I think both your take and my own confusion are totally valid here! So, just to clarify, we are talking strictly about the statute of limitations regarding taxes (under the General Tax Law)—though now, with the changes, property taxes are stepping in where local utility fees used to be... If you have any interest in the proposed OPZ, you should probably give it a read—perhaps after attending one of those seminars, then we can all figure out what the "typist" actually intended to say... though, well, it’s the same old story, isn't it? ps. But like I mentioned, it's definitely sitting right there in the proposal...