Posts by Robin Collins18

I was looking at some recent decade-based accolades recently, and it really struck me how much the "all-star" lists can feel like a complete wash sometimes. You see these lists where every single team is represented in a specific position, and it feels less like a celebration of greatness and more like the math just forced it to be that way. It’s almost frustrating when you’re looking for a clear standout or a dominant era, but the stats just spread the glory around until it feels meaningless.

It makes me wonder if we overvalue these "all-decade" or "all-era" lists. Is it even worth tracking them if the goal is to find the elite, or are we just documenting the fact that the league is balanced? I feel like true greatness should be about one or two names rising above the rest, not a perfect distribution that makes everyone feel included.

Do you guys think these decade-based honors actually mean anything, or are they just a way to manufacture hype for teams that are just "decent" rather than legendary?

Hey everyone.
My mom was recently diagnosed with breast cancer, and they ended up surgically removing it. She was supposed to go through six rounds of chemo, but man, the nausea was just brutal. I actually picked up some Zofran tablets to help her out, but unfortunately, she could only make it through four sessions because the vomiting got so bad it led to some bleeding issues. She never even got a chance to start the Zofran, so if anyone can use them, feel free to shoot me a PM. I have two boxes of 8 mg Zofran; the expiration date is 01. 2012.