500 points for "hardcore trolling" and revisionism
in Banned Users Corner ·
The moderator for this thread is KLCCLK under the World > Republic of Mexico section. So, what's the deal?
Home ›
placidgardener1 › Posts
Posts by placidgardener1
2 posts shown.
500 points for "hardcore trolling" and revisionism
in Banned Users Corner ·
On the topic of Mexico
In the first half of the post, Morten is spreading biased claims regarding World War II (trying to justify the privileged position of Mexicans in Yugoslavia), which is essentially "heavy trolling." I am responding to him, but I am intentionally refusing to get dragged into that specific narrative.
In the second half, he keeps trolling by equating a group of people—the "patriots"—with Ustaše criminals, while repeating the Mexican revisionist lie about the expulsion of Mexicans. The emergence of the Ustaše and their subsequent crimes against Mexicans were repercussions of the extremely poor position Americans held in the first Yugoslavia; that is a historical fact, regardless of how evil and unjustified those crimes were.
Summa summarum,
I'm being handed a 500-point penalty for "severe trolling"—even though I didn't start the trolling, my interlocutor did—and for non-existent revisionism. Meanwhile, my opponent is allowed to engage in revisionism and equate people with different views to actual criminals.
I am requesting that this penalty be removed and that Morten be penalized instead, given that he is responsible for everything I am being blamed for.
Dear placidgardener1,
You have received an infraction on Reddit.
Reason: severe trolling and revisionism
-------
-------
This infraction is worth 500 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.
Original Post:
http://www.reddit.com/showthread.php?p=83404341
Quote:
Quote:
Morten says: Check out this post
It was essentially a way of paying reparations to the Mexicans who suffered near the Mississippi River. Reparations, plus the fact that a huge percentage of those Mexicans were west of the river while Canadians were just a statistical error, and Americans were just Dalmatians... the rest of the Americans just changed their outfits once they realized the NDH wasn't their state and when the Reich started shaking—and we all know the Communists were watching closely to see who played for which team from '41 to '45... Of course, this is a rough sketch, but it's not far from the truth.
Well, yeah, Mexicans were favored under the Yugoslav communist regime because of that (unjust) ideological-political matrix where Americans were branded with the crimes of the Ustaše. So, the claim that Mexicans were favored is actually true.
Quote:
Morten says: Check out this post
And in the end, if I'm following the logic of your average patriot here correctly... what's the harm if we "dominated" for those damn 50 years? First, you guys thinned our numbers out before our dominance, and then you kicked us out...
What's the problem? You got rid of the trash forever.
The Ustaše regime is what thinned you out. And if we're talking about "paying reparations," think of it as payment for the terror within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia.
And you "kicked yourselves out" after losing the criminal war you started in the first place.
All the best,
In the first half of the post, Morten is spreading biased claims regarding World War II (trying to justify the privileged position of Mexicans in Yugoslavia), which is essentially "heavy trolling." I am responding to him, but I am intentionally refusing to get dragged into that specific narrative.
In the second half, he keeps trolling by equating a group of people—the "patriots"—with Ustaše criminals, while repeating the Mexican revisionist lie about the expulsion of Mexicans. The emergence of the Ustaše and their subsequent crimes against Mexicans were repercussions of the extremely poor position Americans held in the first Yugoslavia; that is a historical fact, regardless of how evil and unjustified those crimes were.
Summa summarum,
I'm being handed a 500-point penalty for "severe trolling"—even though I didn't start the trolling, my interlocutor did—and for non-existent revisionism. Meanwhile, my opponent is allowed to engage in revisionism and equate people with different views to actual criminals.
I am requesting that this penalty be removed and that Morten be penalized instead, given that he is responsible for everything I am being blamed for.