Brenda Chase3 said:What you’re describing just doesn't hold up in the real world at the IRS. I remember one instance where we were working with two different small business owners—each filing separately—and when we entered a dependent deduction on their tax return that wasn't reflected on their official W-4, the local IRS office in the suburban neighborhood and Chicago wouldn't budge. They insisted the business owners come in personally to update their W-4 forms first.
Now, I am kindly asking you to explain how it is even possible for tax authorities to operate this way. Of course, we didn't get into a heated argument with them; it was simply more efficient to just follow their lead and change the paperwork so we could wrap up the filing as quickly as possible.
Given that the tax officials here don't seem to have any answers themselves when you ask them nicely, they clearly just make it up as they go along. That’s why we take the "better safe than sorry" approach and demand that all updates be made to the W-4 as well.
Look, none of us are stupid here. It’s not like I’m hiding their W-4 under my pillow or playing games with them; I'm simply pointing out the kind of situations that actually happen at the IRS. For me, it’s much safer to ensure everything is updated correctly rather than trying to debate the business owners or the tax agents, which would inevitably require drafting formal letters and dealing with all that red tape.
As for the idea that deductions should be calculated for people who haven't submitted a W-4, that is utter nonsense, though I know it happens. If someone fails to provide their W-4, they don't get the standard deduction, and I truly cannot fathom the laziness involved in an employee failing to just pull their own documentation together.
In many cases, I play it extra safe and request documents more often than strictly necessary. The IRS office handling my account always tells us to submit everything perfectly, like total perfectionists, because I know there is someone there who will stare at a single piece of paper like it's a foreign language and demand every detail be drawn out perfectly. That is why I sometimes advise clients based on the hurdles I've personally hit within the system. Besides, why should it be such a struggle for a business owner to put a W-4 in a folder with the rest of their files? It isn't like the paper weighs a ton and won't fit in a binder.
Everything you mentioned is valid, but it doesn't apply to every single agent at the IRS. It seems they blindly follow whatever their software spits out; I have no idea what specific logic drives their programming, nor do I have the time to sit around studying their internal workflows.
🤣 I believe what you are saying, but it seems obvious that you shouldn't place your trust in them.
Then could you please explain to me how it is possible for the IRS to operate this way?
It is quite simple: the individuals working there simply lack the necessary expertise. What else is surprising about that?
No one tests them for competency, their salaries are relatively modest, nobody is held accountable, and there are no consequences for errors.
How could the outcome be anything other than this?
Of course, we didn't argue, because it was easier to just make the change to speed things up and resolve the filing as quickly as possible.
Naturally, avoiding conflict is easier. However, six months down the line, you'll find yourself on the IRS website using their "contact us" form, explaining that you couldn't find any regulations stating that a business owner without a salary or pension needs a PAC, yet the local branch is demanding it.
The system works such that the Headquarters will demand explanations from the branch manager, the department head, and the staff regarding why these demands were made, which might actually lead to some learning.
There is no other way to educate the staff.
Since the IRS agents themselves don't seem to know anything when asked politely, it’s clear THEY are just winging it, so we might as well take a chance and insist that the changes are reflected on the PAC as well.
Yes. They are the ones who trigger the avalanche of incompetence.
In my view, it isn't the agents, but rather the Department of the Treasury.
Everything you said is true, though perhaps not for every agent at the IRS, as they seemingly just blindly follow whatever their software tells them; I have no idea what principles they operate on, nor do I have the time to study their methods.
Well, it isn't a matter of the software; it is a matter of fundamental ignorance.
Brenda Chase3 said:As for me, I have absolutely no idea what I would even do with his business card... I certainly wouldn't be walking around with it in my purse. ☕
Exactly, it serves absolutely no practical purpose anymore.
Back before 2005, the IRS used to require a copy of your employment contract and your personnel file just to set up a PAC.
Even though it was nothing more than bureaucratic red tape and sheer nonsense, at least back then they understood the actual function of the PAC.