slyseal28 said:Tell me—would you be willing to go on the record with this for the press (even anonymously)?
Look, I know my fair share, but I’m not an official spokesperson here. Honestly, it’s not some big secret—this is just how things have operated for years. You really only need to walk through the halls at Mayo Clinic to see it for yourself. I have to admit—it’s actually the most efficient way to handle scheduling. They target patients based on their specific files, so they already know the exact imaging protocol needed before anyone walks in. It maximizes staff efficiency and keeps the machines running constantly. At Mayo, they can push through over 100 CT scans in a single 24-hour window. It's a rare place where you can just show up and say, "Hey, I need a follow-up by mid-December." You won't get an appointment right then and there—but rest assured, you'll get that call by late November or early December. There are patient lists prepared months in advance—sometimes three, four, even five months out—depending on when the follow-up is due.
As for Medicare, the whole system is set up so that those who want care can't get it, and those who don't need it shouldn't have to deal with it. Unfortunately, hospital institutes protect their budgets by dodging the high-cost scans. See, according to the federal guidelines in the US, the term MSCT isn't even officially recognized yet—so Medicare acts baffled about how it's possible to scan 230 slices in 15 seconds when the manual says it should take over two hours. Their solution? Just stretch everything out. If the billing doesn't match the manual perfectly, the invoice gets kicked back to the institute for "corrections" and they can't collect the payment. So, why bother doing the scan at all😕? The government loses either way...
unless....
take, for example, why would a place like Jordan
be operating at a profit? I'm genuinely curious if anyone here has a theory on that.🙂