Tyler Thomas15 said:To prevent us from dwelling on yesterday's news—over on the Red Army forums—I decided to pose a question to the gentleman representing the supporter group here:
Have you considered launching a forum on the official Hajduk Split website, where candidates for the Supervisory Board could present their qualifications directly to voters, rather than leaving the public and potential voters to read about them on various news outlets or through reports from the Board of Directors or the Board of Directors?
We have weighed this option, though one wonders how many "reasonable" questions might actually arise.
Furthermore, there is the matter of how much time these candidates can realistically devote to answering inquiries while remaining logged into a forum.
Our initial thought was to employ a moderator to direct specific questions toward the candidates.
Ultimately, it all depends on the volume of participation.
Regardless, we intend for every candidate’s presentation to remain consistent. While we certainly plan to facilitate interaction with the fans, we are still evaluating the most effective and straightforward approach.
More broadly, our goal is to guide people toward understanding the actual functions and responsibilities of the Supervisory Board. We wish to steer clear of trivial questions regarding coaching appointments or whether they intend to push out Fio and similar matters. The Supervisory Board serves a very specific purpose, and we believe the fans should be educated on that role so they can select their candidates accordingly. The emphasis ought to be placed on professional expertise, rather than who possesses the more compelling narrative regarding "guarantees" or being the "foundation stones" of a better Hajduk Split. Judging by the media presentations offered by some current candidates, it appears even they may not fully grasp the scope of their intended duties.
In any case, when I first opened this thread, I outlined what the role should entail: