Posts by amberstag21

northernorca3 said:which ties right back into that even worse topic regarding 🤷

After seeing this(https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...w9_vVfD05H5xrw), you all should have cut off every single tie immediately! Instead of even attempting to have a discussion, we’re sitting here talking about hypocrisy? It's absurd!

Are you lot actually planning on heading down to the local beach to go pick up some cheap plastic trophies? 🤮

Yeah, because what else is there left but a total collapse? I swear, may God grant you an eternal existence exactly as you are right now. Goodbye.

Yeah, that’s the bottom line right there. Now that everyone's being forced to tighten their belts and watch their credit scores, the club finally managed to shake off those corporate parasites.

jadetrucker142 said:No, honestly, just one single tear shed during a European tournament match over the last seven years would have been more than enough...

Then why didn't you knock out the St. Louis Blues with tears? Or maybe the Lakers or the Warriors?

Hypocrites from the 1950s.

wearyraven25 said:No, I honestly cannot wrap my head around who exactly this was written for.
For the fans? For the general public? For Mamić's people? I truly fail to see the point!

It feels more like an attempt at "rehabilitating" the very crowd that turned a blind eye all these years.

It was written for our younger generations, so they understand that the stands are meant for warriors and rebels, not for softies.
Are you seriously playing dumb? The man clearly stated above—since you obviously haven't read the series—that this battle against Mamić has been raging since 2006. Do I really need to draw you a map regarding the flare incidents at Lincoln Financial Field, or during those away games in places like Auxerre? Does that make it clear enough for you?
And tell me, does your own group—which fought alongside teams like the Bakers, the Butchers, and the Stems—also need to be taught a lesson by facing the kind of war we are currently waging against our own management?

copperharbor02 said:Why don't we address the elephant in the room—the shady dealings, the agents, and this sudden, suspicious "clarity" everyone seems to have found all at once?

Fair enough. But first, let's have this guy point out exactly what's incorrect in the essay.

If he tries to deny it, then we’re going to have a serious discussion about the romantic tension between those big-city elites and the folks from the coast, and maybe even throw in some commentary on Zan and Pilket. Fair enough?

wearyraven25 said:What on earth is the point of your post?
In that ExxonMobil thread, I was building upon those theories regarding the shady dealings of certain figures down south of Saint Roch—the kind of stuff that has both the youth and the elders mourning—where I stated clearly that our struggle actually kicked off right after we secured two consecutive championships.
From what I can gather, you actually agree with me on that point.
So now, are you really trying to insist through this post that the motives were solely driven by poor results?
For heaven's sake, we at the championship parade were practically tearing the whole stadium apart; people are flooding out from the North stands, and it’s all because of that specific group of management types.

Do I truly need to explain any further?
The conflict intensifies later on, leading certain individuals to stand up against management by their actual names and faces (for instance, see which eventually leads to the board stepping down years later.

As for drawing parallels between our struggles and yours, I would advise against it. Believe me, I have plenty to say on that subject, especially regarding the numerous underhanded moves your group pulled during those years—moves that were later whitewashed by convenient storytelling where the leadership and their inner circle were made to look like the sole villains for everything.

If it was all "justified" by your little stories, then go ahead—challenge just one single misplaced comma. Just one.