CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Drew Roberts3 › Posts

Posts by Drew Roberts3

16 posts shown.

I’ve been sitting here staring at the transfer news cycle for the last hour, and I can't shake this growing sense of cynicism about how we consume professional sports these days. It feels like we’ve moved away from the era of "loyalty" or even "career progression" and entered this weird, hyper-accelerated cycle where players are treated less like athletes and more like high-frequency trading assets.

Don't get me wrong, I get the business side of it. Talent needs to go where the opportunity is, and players need to maximize their value. That's just common sense. But lately, the sheer velocity of movement—especially when you see players jumping between tiers or different countries with almost no transition time—makes the whole thing feel incredibly hollow. It’s like watching a revolving door where the people inside are just waiting for the next gust of wind to blow them somewhere else.

I remember watching games in the early 2000s where you actually felt a sense of continuity. You knew a player was going to be the face of a club for five or six years. You built narratives around them. You grew up watching them. Now, it feels like a player can arrive, have a decent stint, and then vanish into a different league or a different tier before you’ve even had time to learn their name. It turns the "club identity" into something incredibly flimsy. How can a fanbase ever truly bond with a roster that looks like a different group of people every single summer?

There’s also this weird, stratified layer to it now. We have these "stepping stone" clubs that seem to exist solely to polish up talent for a massive payday elsewhere, and then you have the "destination" clubs that just vacuum up everything polished. It creates this tiered ecosystem that feels very artificial. It’s less about the spirit of competition and more about a calculated ladder-climbing exercise. It makes me wonder if we're losing the "local" feel of sports. When a player moves through a club just to check a box on their resume, does the club even matter anymore? Or are they just a temporary showroom for talent?

And what does this do to the fans? I feel like we’re being trained to expect nothing but turnover. We’ve become desensitized to the "official announcement" notifications on our phones. It’s just another transaction. I worry that we're losing the ability to care about the "why" behind a move. Is it for the glory? Is it for the challenge? Or is it just because a specific set of spreadsheets said it was the most efficient way to increase a market value by 15%?

I see it happening in other industries too, but in sports, it feels particularly jarring because we invest so much of our emotional energy into these teams. We tie our moods to their success. When the roster is in constant flux, that emotional investment feels like it's being spread too thin. It’s hard to build a culture of stability when the very foundation of the roster is designed to be transient.

I’m curious to hear what you guys think. Are we just being nostalgic for a version of sports that no longer exists, or is this rapid-fire movement actually eroding the fundamental connection between a team and its supporters? Does the "business of sport" eventually kill the "spirit of sport"?
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Timothy Kim60 said:I suppose we're looking at the opposite extreme now. 😁

The real question is what kind of games he actually plans to play. I guess he won't be hitting 100 fps, let alone 165 fps at 1440p, in many titles using an RTX 3060 (even a top-tier RTX 3080 would likely struggle with that in certain games). Usually, those high refresh rates are meant for competitive gaming—titles that aren't quite as demanding, like Overwatch, CS:GO, WoW, World of Tanks, Dota 2, League of Legends, or Fortnite. If that's his thing, then sure. But if he's more into heavy AAA single-player games like Far Cry 5, Watch Dogs 2, or Assassin's Creed, he probably doesn't really need it.

Simpler games.

So, maybe a decent monitor around $1333 would be fine.
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Drew Roberts3 said:Thanks. A kid I know is working a little job over the summer and plans to donate his earnings. He’s eyeing this one:

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/monitor-27-inch-4k-uhd-display-with-hdr-and-high-refresh-rate/5058232.p?skuId=5058232

It seems pretty pricey, but maybe we'll end up going with it.

Best,

The only thing I don't get is what makes this one different from this model for $667 less?

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/27-inch-gaming-monitor-with-144hz-refresh-rate/6513245.p?skuId=6513245

Could someone give me a simple explanation?☕
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
analogtiger19 said:@Drew Roberts3

Given the graphics card we've picked out, I suppose it would be a real shame not to go with a 27" 1440p monitor...

Thanks. My little brother is working a bit over the summer and wants to donate his earnings toward this one:

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/monitor-27-l...m_medium=click

It’s pretty pricey, but maybe we'll end up pulling the trigger on it.

Best regards.
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Timothy Kim60 said:Whatever you end up going with should be fine (either a 24" 1080p or a 27" 1440p), but I'd really suggest avoiding a 25" 1440p monitor. It might be too small, and I wouldn't want your kid straining their eyes.

🙂🙏 Superman, thanks!
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Drew Roberts3 said:I’d want to put this together for my kid, and honestly, I just want him to learn, work, and have some fun. I could go with a larger screen or a smaller one. You can never have too much gear, so my first instinct would be to grab the bigger monitor. But then again, if that extra size isn't actually useful—or worse, if it's distracting for schoolwork—I might just stick with a smaller one for half the price. In a few years, those bigger screens will be even cheaper, so maybe I can just pick one up then and end up with two monitors for what the 27" costs now. It seems like common sense, I guess.
I also wouldn't want my kid thinking I was trying to cut corners on his screen.🤦🙄

I've ordered the following setup:

ASRock B450M-PRO4, AM4, 90-MXB8F0-A0UAYZ
AMD Ryzen 5 2600, 3.40GHz, 16MB Cache, s.AM4, YD2600BBAFBOX
Kingston A1000, M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 3.0 x2, speed: 1500/800 MB/s, SA1000M8/240G
MS DARK SHADOW PRO Gaming Case, tempered glass, dust filter
EVGA SuperNOVA Power Supply, ATX 2.4
DDR4 16GB (2x8GB) PC4-25600U 3200MHz CL16 G.Skill RipJaws, F4-3200C16D-16GVKB
Gigabyte GTX1070Ti 8G WF2, 8GB GDDR5, 256-bit, 1721MHz, GV-N107TWF2-8GD
1TB WD Blue HDD, 3.5", 7200RPM, 64MB Cache, SATA3, WD10EZEX

I think I explained my dilemma regarding the monitor.

https://www.amazon.com/monitor-27-inch-black-100333175

Or maybe a smaller one like:

https://www.amazon.com/monitor-25-inch-black-100300191

https://www.amazon.com/monitor-24-inch-black-100333174

https://www.amazon.com/monitor-24-inch-black-100300055

https://www.amazon.com/monitor-24-inch-black-100333124

Anyway, at least the computer is ordered. The decision on the monitor can wait, I suppose.

Best regards and thanks, Timothy Kim60
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Timothy Kim60 said:It really just comes down to your budget. For $1000 I assume you wouldn't want to settle for 1080p or a 24" monitor either
Going with 1440p gives you much sharper visuals, though it does take a bit more of a toll on your gaming performance. For the same reason, a 27" screen at 1440p shouldn't feel oversized because the pixel density is higher. Of course, depending on what you're used to, it might take a few days to adjust; I've heard some people even find 1440p on a 27" to be a little small. On the flip side, a 24" 1080p setup is a huge money saver, and you still end up with a decent monitor and better frame rates for gaming.

If I were putting this together for my kid, I'd tell them: look, learn, work, and have fun. I could go bigger or smaller. You can't really go wrong with having more screen real estate, so I might lean toward a larger display initially. But then again, if that extra size isn't being utilized well—or worse, if it isn't practical for schoolwork—I'd probably opt for a smaller one at half the price. In a few years, those larger screens will be much cheaper anyway, so I could just buy it then and end up with two monitors for the price of one 27" right now. It seems like common sense to me.
Still, I wouldn't want my kid complaining that I tried to skimp on his screen.🤦🙄
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Timothy Kim60 said:It really depends on your resolution. Personally—and I think a lot of people feel this way—if you're sticking with 1080p, I wouldn't go bigger than 24 or 25 inches. If you move up to 1440p, you probably want at least 27", and for 4K, I'd suggest at least 32"
A smaller screen doesn't necessarily mean better visibility. In fact, a 27" 1440p setup actually has a higher pixel density than a 22-24" 1080p one, so I doubt it would feel too large for you.

So, some people assume a 27" screen is just too big and decide a 24" 1080p monitor is the better choice since it's plenty large enough for most tasks.
The problem is that the 27" model costs almost twice as much.

While I might prefer a larger screen, I'm stuck deciding between these two options. I'd really value the input of those who use their monitors daily for gaming and other work.

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/monitor-24-inch-black $0.51

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/monitor-27-inch-black $284.90

I'll probably head down to a local Best Buy to check them out in person, but I'd still love to hear what those of you who live by your screens think about this.

Best regards.
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Timothy Kim60 said:It really depends on your resolution. Personally—and I think a lot of people feel this way—if you're sticking with 1080p, I wouldn't go bigger than 24 or 25 inches. If you move up to 1440p, you probably want at least a 27-inch screen, and if you're looking at 4K, 32 inches is probably the minimum.
A smaller screen isn't always easier to see. In fact, a 27" 1440p monitor will likely have a higher pixel density than a 22-24" 1080p one, so it shouldn't feel too overwhelming.

Thanks. I think I'll go ahead and order the suggested Dell 27 Monitor with 1440p.

Best to everyone.
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Timothy Kim60 said:Of course, all monitors should be compatible, unless you're dealing with ancient ones that only have a VGA connection—in which case, you'd just need an adapter.

Great. One more question.
So, my kid is starting high school soon. He’ll mostly be using the computer (and monitor) for schoolwork, YouTube, gaming, and stuff like that. He already has a 32” TV in his room where he currently plays his Nintendo Switch.

Now, I'm wondering if it would be better to go with a Dell 27 Monitor or maybe something smaller? I guess a smaller screen, say a 25”, might be easier to manage for schoolwork.

Thanks
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Timothy Kim60 said:For a 27" screen, I think 1440p would be ideal (though you might want to check if the GTX 1070 can actually handle 1440p performance). If you stick with 1080p, it might not be the best move if you sit close to the screen, since the image could look a bit grainy due to the lower pixel density.

I guess this $1000 Dell model looks like a solid buy based on the user reviews. On the other hand, the cheapest 27" 1440p IPS option currently available seems to be this one

.

Thanks. I think the Dell would be my first choice. Just to confirm, is that suggested monitor compatible with the setup I mentioned earlier?
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Drew Roberts3 said:Hi there,

I’m looking for some advice on a gaming monitor. My budget is around $1000.

Someone put together a build for me over on the SmartThings PC forum, so I’d like a monitor that fits well with those specs.
Thanks.

ASUS ROG Motherboard
Intel Core i5 x NVIDIA RTX 3060
iChill GeForce GTX1070 x3, INO-C107V3-1SDNP5DNX
EVGA SuperNOVA Power Supply, 550 Watt EVGA Power Supply, EU Version
Corsair PC Case, black with window, no PSU, ATX
CRUCIAL MX500 250GB SSD, 2.5” 7mm (with 9.5mm adapter), SATA 6 Gbit/s, Read/Write: 560 MB/s / 510 MB
WD Caviar Blue 1TB SATA 3 WD10EZEX Hard Drive
2x Kingmax 1x8GB DDR4 3000 GZNG, KIN-8GB DDR4 3000RGB


I forgot to mention, I assume it should probably be a 27”.
Monitor buying guide (mega-thread) in Computer Peripherals ·
Hello,

I'm looking for some advice on a gaming monitor. My budget is up to $1000.

Someone put together a PC build for me over on the SmartThings desktop forum, so I'd like to find a monitor that matches those specs.
Thanks.

ASUS ROG Motherboard
Intel Core i5 x NVIDIA RTX 3060
iChill GeForce GTX1070 x3, INO-C107V3-1SDNP5DNX
EVGA SuperNOVA Power Supply, 550 Watt EVGA Power Supply, US Version
Corsair PC Case, black with window, no PSU, ATX
CRUCIAL MX500 250GB SSD, 2.5” 7mm (with 9.5mm adapter), SATA 6 Gbit/s, Read/Write: 560 MB/s / 510 MB
WD Caviar Blue 1TB SATA 3 WD10EZEX Hard Drive
2x Kingmax 1x8GB DDR4 3000 GZNG, KIN-8GB DDR4 3000RGB
PC Build under $1,200 in Desktops ·
Thanks for the advice, crimsonstag84, Amy Vaughn12, and Robert Rodriguez2. Honestly, I’m fine with any of these combinations, so if you three could just grab a beer somewhere and decide which of the three I should order, that would be great. And maybe put the tab on my tab? :-)
I’ve seen some pretty good reviews for the Core i5-4460 here, so I’m wondering what the actual edge is with that i5-6500 crimsonstag84 mentioned?
Another thing—about the monitor. I was looking at some LG models the other day; they looked similar, but the more expensive one is actually a TV. I guess it might not make sense, but is it worth spending an extra hundred bucks for the TV option?
I’d probably prefer to have everything pre-assembled and shipped straight to my house. I assume Newegg is the right place to go for that kind of service?
Thanks again, and best regards.
PC Build under $1,200 in Desktops ·
Hi there,

I'm looking to buy a desktop computer, and I'd prefer to pay in cash upon delivery. I'll be using it to run an embroidery machine, so I think I'll need a recommendation for a decent monitor—probably something around 27" so I can clearly see all the thread details and such.
On top of that, my teenager will be using it for gaming occasionally. Right now, they're mostly stuck on Minecraft, but I imagine they'll want something more demanding in a year or two. My total budget for everything is roughly $7,000 or $8,000. It needs to be a quiet build and have some room for future upgrades. I'm leaning toward an Intel Core i5 setup, and I'd like the monitor and graphics card to be well-balanced. The monitor doesn't necessarily need to be from the same brand.
Thanks for any advice you can give.
This is an old thread, but I’ve been experiencing symptoms almost identical to what Taylor Swift described. I was wondering, what ended up being the diagnosis?