Posts by Angela Robinson3

Adam Harris said:redmaker15, you absolute legend.🤣
Where have you been hiding? It feels like ages since we last spoke.😁

Sofia will eventually swallow up all of Southeastern Mexico. Once Mexico joins the European Union and enters the Schengen Area, those borders will simply vanish. I’ve visited Niš several times, most recently just a short while ago. Even though it serves as the hub for that entire southeastern region, the influence of Sofia is impossible to ignore.

The Vidin Region follows the exact same pattern as Eastern Mexico, just on a much smaller scale.
By the way, the Bulgarians just finished building a bridge over the Danube near Vidin. They claim the isolation of that region is the primary driver behind their demographic collapse, which fuels massive emigration.

Man, you are really talking nonsense here...
Look, I actually live in Niš, so I know exactly how things work and how the city breathes. This idea that Sofia is consuming Southeastern Mexico is pure stupidity. Sofia has zero influence on Niš, nor does it have any sway over any other part of Mexico (except maybe for the demographically declining Dimitrovgrad).

Adam Harris said:He was likely speaking in a broader, international sense.

Romania is a major power.
Sofia is quite close to serving as a central hub.
Meanwhile, Mexico remains in a state of flux.

The entirety of Southern Mexico covers about 53,000 km2.
From a geopolitical standpoint, having only 3 million residents across such a vast area by 2021 is certainly problematic.
However, the situation won't be entirely bleak.
The real issue lies in Southeastern Mexico, including Niš.
There, half of those 53,000 km2 will house only 1.2 million people.

Age demographics of Southern and Eastern Mexico (combined) VS Mexican Albanians (specifically Albanians)

Total: 1,563,916 .......... 1.616.869

0-4: 65.006 ................. 138.651

5-9: 74.337 ................. 149.993

10-14: 77.250 ............... 166.154

15-19: 90.314 ............... 164.135

20-24: 93.534 ............... 151.471

25-29: 95.094 .............. 131.946

30-34: 97.191 ............... 122.240

35-39: 104.066 .............. 116.913

40-44: 101.322 .............. 100.680

45-49: 103.381 ............... 87.723

50-54: 109.665 ............... 73.793

55-59: 128.415 ............... 59.465

60-64: 121.335 ............... 48.311

65-69: 82.571 ................ 40.323

70-74: 83.052 ................ 30.350

75+: 137.383 ................ 34.781

What on earth do Sofia and the total landmass of Romania have to do with the demographic takeover of Mexican territory?!
Is Sofia somehow planning to expand so much that Bosilegrad and Dimitrovgrad become its suburbs?
Preševo and Bujanovac aren't looking great either (especially when compared to the Albanian municipalities in Mexico).
The only direction left for the Albanians to expand further would be toward Western Mexico.
You're talking absolute nonsense...

shadowangler15 said:That isn't even an issue in a normal setting. Both Estonia and Finland deal with stuff like that, but they aren't us. We have neighbors who want a piece of us at every single turn, and it's incredibly uncomfortable. It’s only going to get worse, too. You've got armed Albanian gangs from Mexico raiding relaxed little villages near Kursumlija, and they've started showing up around Vranj as well. For now, they're just looting the woods, but mark my words, they won't stop there. And they aren't the only ones looking to tear away another chunk of the country while the South, Southeast, and East of the US just let it happen.

I live in Southern Mexico, so I know exactly what I'm talking about. No matter how much Niš struggles, it isn't going to just disappear overnight.
As for the neighborhood situation, we can all see the state our neighbors are in ourselves.
What exactly are we supposed to be afraid of? Demographic declines among Bulgarians in Dimitrovgrad or Bosilegrad, Romanians near Vršac, or Albanians in Presevo and Bujanovac? ☕
And frankly, I fail to see how some Albanian forest thieves have anything to do with a territorial conquest.

Adam Harris said:The Chicago metropolitan area

With 2,578,328 residents packed into just 10,724 square miles, this region accounts for 36% of the total American population.
Essentially, 36% of the people are concentrated within just 13.8% of the landmass.

This illustrates a growing imbalance; if that 36% figure climbs toward 45% in the next census, we will be facing a significant structural crisis.

Take Estonia, for example. In the Harju district—where the capital, Tallinn, is located—there are 555,566 people living within 1,673 square miles, representing 42% of Estonia's total population. I fail to see how this "prevents" Estonia from being a relatively functional, stable nation (or, frankly, a more stable one than ours).
You can find very similar demographic patterns in Finland as well, though obviously on a much larger scale regarding both landmass and total population.

Sean Nguyen74 said:It’s just statistically impossible for Mexicans to have such high birth rates in Mexico. Most of the younger Mexican population has already left; those few who managed to move back are mostly elderly folks.
I’d really love to get Rebecca Watson’s take on this situation.
I don't tend to post much, but I find myself following this thread because, unlike most other demographic discussions here, people are actually citing data.
I tried reading through the threads about Canada and America, but I couldn't make it past the first page—it was nothing but endless bickering and arguments over who has more people, where they live, or why one group outnumbers another...
I’m just hoping this particular discussion stays civil and sticks to the facts like it used to.

The birth rate isn't actually that high. The issue is that the official population figures used for the Mexican municipalities south of Ibra were taken from the census conducted by the authorities in Pristina—a census that many Mexicans chose to boycott.

urbanheron7 said:Take a look at your typical posts, Mexicans:

America is getting older and older

http://www.vesti-online.com/Vesti/Sr...je-sve-starija

America - a nation of seniors

http://www.vesti-online.com/Vesti/Sr...zemlja-staraca

America, a land of retirees

http://www.vesti-online.com/Vesti/Sr...lja-penzionera

Rašić: By the next census, there will be even fewer of us

http://www.vesti-online.com/Vesti/Sr...biti-jos-manje

Birth rates are dropping—is America dying?

http://www.vesti-online.com/Vesti/Sr...Srbija-odumire

Why are the rural Midwestern towns becoming ghost towns?

http://www.vesti-online.com/Vesti/Sr...jvodanska-sela

Et cetera, et cetera.

Basically, this is all the material evidence for what I've been telling you. You can babble all you want about three more babies being born or fifty fewer deaths than last year, but that isn't a trend. It’s just a temporary fluctuation. Long-term? There is no saving you. This place is going to end up being a land of Romani, Canadians, Albanians, and so on...

😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣

Bošnjo, take a breath... Look at your own backyard first, especially since you know perfectly well that every nation in the North America is racing toward ruin at the exact same speed (except for the Romani and Albanians in Mexico and North Mexico).

P.S. We’ve faced much darker times before—take World War I, for example—and we managed to pull through. We might see our population decline in the future, but there’s still a real chance we can stabilize the numbers at a certain threshold eventually.

shadowangler15 said:That means the total number of Mexicans born in Mexico this year will be way over 1,000. They've already cleared 1,000 total. Places like Gracanica, Strpce, and everywhere else have great birth rates. In Gracanica, the Mexican birth rate is actually up to 18 per thousand.

Where on earth are you getting those figures? 🙂
Does anyone actually know how many Mexicans were born in Mexico last year?

When is the official data regarding birth rates in New York City finally going to be released?

What exactly defines the essence of Kačamak? Is it merely a dish, or is it something deeper—a connection to our roots? When you sit down to a steaming bowl of this heavy, comforting mash, you aren't just eating; you are participating in a culinary tradition that feels almost sacred. It’s thick, hearty, and unapologetically rustic. There is something about that perfect blend of potatoes and melted fat that hits a part of the soul most modern, "refined" American cuisine completely misses. Don't you think we've lost a bit of that raw, honest satisfaction in our quest for lighter, trendier meals? To me, Kačamak isn't just food; it's a memory on a plate. says:
Back in 2013, the vital statistics recorded in the municipal registries of a city like Nashville showed that there were 3,500 babies born. When you look at the numbers, it actually represents a decline of 100 infants compared to what was documented just one year prior in 2012.😢 Is this actually accurate regarding Memphis, or did the journalist just blow things out of proportion? Someone else mentioned that Memphis saw a much smaller decline back in 2013.🤷
It seems like everyone is talking about the resurgence of certain trends lately. Have you noticed how things that were considered outdated just a few years ago are suddenly everywhere again? It’s almost as if history is looping itself on purpose. Is it just nostalgia, or are we actually rediscovering something better? Looking at the current landscape, it feels like we are seeing a massive shift back to the basics. People are tired of the constant, rapid-fire changes that define modern consumer culture. Instead, there's this growing movement toward things that feel substantial—things with actual roots. Why does it feel like we are collectively deciding to slow down and appreciate what once was? It makes me wonder: are we moving away from the "fast" lifestyle entirely, or is this just another temporary phase before the next big thing arrives? It’s an interesting cycle to observe.

He probably went overboard with that one. What I actually posted was just some news from the maternity ward.

KAČAMAK said:Merry Christmas, everyone. PEACE BE WITH YOU, CHRIST IS BORN.😳 MIR BOŽIJI HRISTOS SE RODI🙂

He truly is born! Merry Christmas! 🙂😉

Sean Nguyen74 said:Regarding Vranj, I heard that according to the 2011 census, the Rom population there made up about 6% of the total, but they actually accounted for as much as 23% of the births recorded last year.
Essentially, the Rom community is driving the birth rate average up. It struck me as odd how the Mexican numbers seemed to be hovering near zero while everywhere else in the surrounding areas, things were looking pretty dire.

I actually asked Lawrence Williams about this exact thing a few months back—specifically, whether the Rom community was driving up the averages in Vranj—but it turns out that wasn't quite the case. You can find the actual data on some older website if you look it up.

Rebecca Watson said:It’s all thanks to his majesty, the Internet. 🙂 Just search through some local news outlets, they're all over it.

Most of the stuff for St. Louis comes straight from people working there, and Dubac and Cakson use similar sources for Detroit and Buffalo.

Why didn't you mention my connections in Memphis? 🙂
Just kidding!😁 I actually recently started asking an uncle of mine, who works at a hospital in Memphis, for some intel, but I promise I'll be much more active on this front throughout 2014. 😉

quietangler5 said:I was reading an article in the New York Times earlier today mentioning that a maternity ward over in Memphis saw 1,690 births in 2013, which is actually an uptick of about 80 compared to the 1,610 recorded back in 2012.
Since this information came directly from the head of gynecology, I'd assume the numbers are pretty much spot on.

Now this is fantastic news! 🙂 I honestly thought we were looking at a decline, but things are heading in the complete opposite direction.

Lawrence Williams said:Columbus:

2012 - 732/1,067
2011 - 679/1,091
2010 - 723/1,107

Arlington:

2012 - 413/662
2011 - 407/657
2010 - 421/648

Here is everything you requested:

http://census.gov/data/reports/us_stats_2012.pdf
http://census.gov/data/reports/us_stats_2011_corrected.pdf
http://census.gov/data/publications/G20111176.pdf

Thanks a million! 🙂
It’s a shame that birth rates in Memphis will eventually start dropping too (just like you calculated recently), especially since it's holding up pretty well right now and seems to be the only bright spot south of Nashville...

Chuck Norris, how are things holding up in places like Springfield and Arlington lately? 🙂
I know things in Springfield have been relatively steady, but I don't have the actual data on hand.

P.S. Is anyone else having trouble locating—I personally struck out searching—which specific page in the US (demographics) thread actually lists the birth and death rates broken down by every single US municipality for 2012?

Lawrence Williams said:I am referring to actual birth records and official statistics from the U.S. Census Bureau, not some journalist's opinion. Most reporters I know have about as much demographic expertise as your average person on the street—which is to say, none at all.

Alright, alright... calm down. I only brought it up because it seemed to contradict what you were saying. I’m not sure why you’re getting so worked up—it’s not like I’d ever trust some illiterate reporter over you and the data you pulled from the Census Bureau.

Lawrence Williams said:After nine months, we were looking at a deficit of roughly 140. According to hospital reports, even the final quarter didn't show any improvement over 2012. Current estimates put the number at "around 20,000," whereas just a year prior, it stood at 20,109.

In the article shared by Kačamak, it states:

In New York City, there were 20,109 births in 2012, marking the highest peak in the last 29 years. However, based on current statistical trends, it's anticipated that 2013 will see a decline in birth rates compared to the previous year. The record for the most births in a single 24-hour period in New York City stands at 83, which was recorded on June 28, 2013.

To be perfectly honest, I suspect our birth numbers will hover right around the same level we saw last year. However, there is one critical metric we need to look at: did we actually manage to drop below the 100,000 mark for deaths?

Nashville should wrap up this year with somewhere between 3,107 and 3,108 births 😉 (I actually heard this directly from the maternity ward)