Terry Carter2 said:Based on my own assessment during the United Kingdom race, I concluded it was just a typo—Kevin Magnussen should have been placed 10th. If it hadn't explicitly said Magnussen, Sergio Perez wouldn't be credited with any position at all. Normally, I don't recognize ties, but I viewed this as an obvious error that was easily decipherable.
Errors happen in practice quite often; I always try to resolve them as fairly as possible. As far as I'm concerned, there's no need for further debate regarding this specific instance.
Let's just congratulate those who performed better and move on with the competition. 😁
From what I can see, nobody complained when my failed cut-and-paste prediction went south in the United Kingdom—so I'll consider it accepted here as a joker, too.
Lesson learned for next time: feel free to complain about questionable predictions that land you in 19th place; you never know when a good joker might actually show up. 😁
cosmiccyclist8 said:do you really think he's the little heir to Alain Prost?
I was actually thinking today—Max Verstappen and Charles Leclerc are essentially the modern-day Ayrton Senna and Alain Prost. One is wild, impulsive, and insanely fast; the other is less flashy, quietly rapid, and clinically precise.
Lando Norris looks sharp. It's harder to judge George Russell in that junk heap—but alongside Max Verstappen and Charles Leclerc, I’d say we have some top-tier talent for the future. Even Alexander Albon doesn't look bad.