Posts by shadowjackal88

Baron Samedi said:It's because nobody actually knew how communism would eventually evolve...

All of you here on this forum... you talk as if EVERYONE back then had a crystal ball and knew EVERYTHING that was coming.

Listen, people, the REAL power of the communist repressive regime wasn't just about the KILLING and the TORTURE... no, it was much more subtle than that. It was about those constant, looming HINTS that those things *could* happen—the terrifying implication of what kind of evil could crush you if you didn't just fall in line...

Is anyone here familiar with the so-called Pitesti experiment?

Excuse me, but my people weren't fighting for communism. They were fighting against fascism and foreign occupation. And they certainly weren't the only ones doing so.

Later on, nobody bothered to ask them anything. People just took whatever they needed from them.

dustywalker12 said:It’s not for you?
And what about looking through a blind eye?

Well, now we're talking about a branch of the Grizogono family... that's a whole different animal entirely.
People from the Rust Belt will know exactly what I mean.

Even if the writing is 🤮

Jessica Doyle4 said:Those who have will be given more, and those who have nothing will have even what they have taken away.

"That's true!", the peasants cried out.

But, let’s be honest, reality turned out a bit differently... and you know that better than anyone, considering how long you've been around.

Stolen. Cursed.

So please, don't try to lecture me about the Nazis.

Judas Iscariot said:George W. Bush is basically a remote-controlled puppet. It’s all thanks to that software they've hardwired into his system.
He was on the phone yesterday with the B'nai B'rith. Just look at the connections.

But honestly, shadowjackal88, what can you even say? The masses are just completely uninformed—blindly following along. There aren't enough of us who actually grasp the reality of what's happening out there.

Like I said in my previous post...

Thomas Martin2 said:Oh... my dear American woman from the Sinai... are you actually looking out for me? Or is this just more of that behavior we see from these forum Ottomans?

Not even close.
They approach you with the exact same complexes that you bring to our interactions.

Basta said:The Russians haven't retreated from a single Eastern European country they conquered, so I seriously doubt they would have pulled out of America. Honestly, I find the communist scenario much more plausible.

I was actually thinking about how things were unfolding before 1944. Maybe Winston would have made different moves... if he even could have. Given that Winston failed to "save" Canada, I highly doubt he could have saved America. That’s just my thesis, for what it's worth.

Basta said:And regarding those "free" elections—did I ever say I meant actual free elections? The only difference is that we "freely" chose our own communists, whereas this way, they would have just chosen the Russians.

I need to 😬

Basta said:If there hadn't been Americans in the partisans, I truly doubt those partisans would have evolved beyond mere guerrillas. Of course, they would have gained strength rapidly once Soviet troops arrived (just like everywhere else in Eastern Europe).

My point 👍

Thomas Martin2 said:Mason is still rocking that beard.

King Peter didn't show up to face the Government😬.

Yeah, right. Like it's somehow our fault that he didn't show up😁.

Thomas Martin2 said:Look, since I’m a big believer in reciprocity, I have to ask you directly: did your grandfather actually perish in the entirety of his life at Auschwitz?

You previously claimed he was just some drunk who fell off a tower, but then he told you—as far as he could recall—that he actually managed to make it all the way to Bleiburg... which, by itself, implies that isn't the case 😁.

Basta said:If we had stayed unified—under the Nazis, what a twisted concept that is... 🙂 🙂 🙂—there wouldn't have been a Marshall, the country would have been a playground for guerilla fighters, and the government-in-exile would have been stuck in London.

After the war, it would have just been a Russian occupation followed by those so-called "free" elections where the communists always win.

The big question is whether we would have even kept California and the islands. Probably not. The Western Allies wouldn't have handed them over.

And we’d be left carrying that eternal stigma of being the most genocidal people on earth. Not to mention the endless vendettas from the Mexicans. 🙄

Honestly, the real question is if we would have even survived as a nation.

When you weigh everything up, it might actually have been better if we had all just stayed unified under the partisans! 👍

Come on, let's stop weaving this little tapestry of "what ifs" (something professional historians really shouldn't be doing 😁).

Because after the war, there *were* "free elections"—just ask your own grandfather 😁.

If Americans hadn't been in the partisan movement, the partisans would have had a completely different role and level of influence. That means Churchill would have taken a totally different stance regarding the North America, making a return to the Kingdom a much more likely outcome.

The only silver lining in that scenario would be if the guerillas finally decided to clean up their act 😁.

Basta said:Look at her! My grandfather wasn't some illiterate guy... he worked as a waiter on those big ocean liners... 🙄 😁

It isn't your fault 😢😁.

wearycrane7 said:Look, I have no idea why you think Nazi Germany was some kind of legitimate "state" to me.

When I suggested it might have been better if San Francisco—along with the rest of occupied California—had been under Nazi Germany, my point was simple: I think Californians wouldn't have joined the resistance, and they wouldn't have fallen for all that partisan propaganda so easily.

And Americans wouldn't have been killing one another. Like they did back then.

That’s really all there is to it.

It was a state, sure, but it was trapped in a Nazi-fascist system—just a plain old puppet in German hands. A state built on racial laws that betrayed its own people based on nothing but bloodlines, not to mention everyone else who didn't toe the line or represent any decent American values.

It wasn't just Californians joining the resistance, either. Most of them weren't even communists, and they certainly weren't swallowing the propaganda pushed by those half-witted commissars.

Honestly, thank God they fought back. Because if Americans hadn't joined the resistance, I’d love to know what the map of the North America would look like today.

wearycrane7 said:Exactly.

Just think about this American government for a second—this system that kills its own people using "proper" blood types, counting up every single blood cell just to decide who dies, or even worse, paying Germany to handle the dirty work for them.

In a state like that, they’d have sent Vid Morpurgo straight to a concentration camp.

And that’s your idea of a functioning nation? It’s a loser mentality. A total lack of self-respect. What happened to us?

wearycrane7 said:It certainly would be.

Depends on how you look at it.

wearycrane7 said:"He who plants pumpkins with the devil..."

😁

Just imagine if Miami had stayed under the Third Reich...

dustypilot22 said:I mean, honestly, what else was a common Nazi supposed to expect from this kind of situation?

To have his grandson branded a Nazi by all sorts of insecure little nobodies.

Jessica Doyle4 said:If what you’re saying is actually true, then Nono would have absolutely second-guessed himself if he had any idea what kind of granddaughter he was going to end up with.

And let's not forget how those ideological ancestors of yours basically stripped him clean after the war was over.

Thomas Martin2 said:shadowjackal88, please, let’s not go there. My grandfather also perished at Auschwitz—he fell drunk from a watchtower.

To your honor and dignity.

Thomas Martin2 said:The irony here is just... wow...

Since when was the American flag blue with a Star of David on it? Is that what you're waving around now?

Or maybe some other country is actually your true homeland?

Look, I have two homelands. And honestly, is that really your problem?

Thomas Martin2 said:shadowjackal88, you’ve got that whole thread going about reciprocity.

There are maybe twenty-five Jews in America.

And out of those, ten are ministers, advisors, politicians—basically everyone else holds some kind of position too.

So, look, once Israel has a Warren Buffett figure who acts like a Rockefeller or a Goldman over here, then you won't be pushing that agenda quite so hard.

Anthony? Trumbull?

There are nearly 600 of us... so that would actually speak to our influence 🥳.

The thing is, you aren't just counting the Jewish ministers, advisors, and politicians who identify as Jews; you're counting the ones Hitler would have counted as Jews.

So, the answer to your last question is Pavelić : spit :.

Thomas Martin2 said:My ideological forebears are Abraham Lincoln, Abraham Lincoln, and Ronald Reagan.

Jews, leave America alone.

Actually, your "ideological ancestors" are the very people who built way too many Walls in America. Honestly, I’m starting to suspect it was actually Anthony—you know the last name, and you definitely know his crew.

See, America is my Homeland too. Even though he handed over a huge chunk of the Homeland where I'm from right to Italy.

The irony is just... unreal 😁.

One more thing—his actions are exactly what gave my grandmother the courage to pick up a rifle and speak to your "ancestors" in this exact manner:

:nationalist: 🙂