Posts by Jerry Green59

gentlemaker6 said:Everything in existence is a form of God's expression. However, God does not act through religions, atheists, or anyone else. If that were the case, free will wouldn't exist; everything would be scripted at the highest level, and the entire universe would lose its purpose. People would turn into robots—mere puppets on a string—and the joy of living would vanish. Believe me, God is capable of much better than that.

Through the principle of free will, every form of divine expression acts entirely independently, following its own principles and making its own decisions.

I am not claiming that one form of divine manifestation is better than another. I am simply saying that humanity would benefit immensely if we all moved together toward an era of peace and prosperity for everyone. I am convinced that is a far better path than the one we are currently walking.

all these questions are flawed because they are phrased in the plural.
Can we do something to protect the country?

I don't know if "we" can.

I know that *I* can.

The questions are plural because they are addressed to everyone. The answer, however, should be given in the singular.

And why should I?
Did you have a private audience with God where He gave you a detailed briefing on how things actually stand?

(.. I’m a bit skeptical about gods who are defined by whatever our neighbors decide is right or wrong, or what constitutes "good" work..)

gentlemaker6 said:I believe it is unnecessary to dwell on the current state of our world; the facts speak for themselves. Every person should be deeply concerned about what lies ahead. The most unsettling part is the lack of a visible exit strategy. To put it bluntly, if we persist on this trajectory, some madman will eventually press the wrong buttons, and it will all come to a very sudden end.

We face a choice, both as a species and as individuals: do we pivot away from this chaos, or do we continue down a path defined by deepening divisions, escalating wars, and total devastation? Regardless of which way we turn, we possess both the strength and the resources required to make it happen.

It is my conviction that this downward spiral can only be reversed through a new kind of spirituality—a fundamental shift in how we relate to God, to ourselves, and to those around us. We can achieve this by establishing a single, concise foundation for our existence:

We are all one.

It is brief, simple, and profoundly true. It suggests that God, our Creator, is not separate from His creation, but rather permeates it entirely. He is the very fabric of every atom and the smallest particle in the physical universe, simultaneously breathing His spirit and life into everything. Because of this, He resides within each of us, is each of us, and is everything surrounding us. This makes us fundamentally identical, as we are crafted from the same essence. It makes us one, because everything that exists is Him, expressed through infinite forms.

As Jesus taught, when we do unto others as we would have them do unto us, we are actually doing it to ourselves, for we are not separate from our neighbors. When we act upon ourselves, we act upon everyone else. By bringing joy to others, we bring joy to ourselves; by helping others, we help ourselves; by insulting others, we insult ourselves; by slandering others, we soil our own reputation; by belittling others, we diminish ourselves; and by loving others, we love ourselves. And by loving ourselves, we love others...

The list of opponents to this idea is exhaustive. Organized religions are first in line, followed closely by atheists. That alone covers nearly the entire human population.

Nevertheless, there are those who grasp this truth and work to spread it. There are spiritual people living this reality and leading by example. A movement is forming, a process unfolding across this planet. It is currently in its infancy, but it is backed by the power of Truth and the force of Love.

I have initiated several threads regarding religion and spirituality, all of which have been intended to lead back to this singular point. I invite everyone to participate.

Can we save our beautiful planet and transform it into a place truly worthy of habitation? Can we transcend our personal, social, and religious limitations to ignite a process of peace, unity, and genuine prosperity? What steps must we take to succeed? Are you willing to join this movement? Do you have a mission? Do you have a vision?

gentlemaker6 said:I believe it is unnecessary to dwell on the current state of our world; the facts speak for themselves. Every person should be deeply concerned about what lies ahead. The most unsettling part is the lack of a visible exit strategy. To put it bluntly, if we persist on this trajectory, some madman will eventually press the wrong buttons, and it will all come to a very sudden end.

We face a choice, both as a species and as individuals: do we pivot away from this chaos, or do we continue down a path defined by deepening divisions, escalating wars, and total devastation? Regardless of which way we turn, we possess both the strength and the resources required to make it happen.

It is my conviction that this downward spiral can only be reversed through a new kind of spirituality—a fundamental shift in how we relate to God, to ourselves, and to those around us. We can achieve this by establishing a single, concise foundation for our existence:

We are all one.

It is brief, simple, and profoundly true. It suggests that God, our Creator, is not separate from His creation, but rather permeates it entirely. He is the very fabric of every atom and the smallest particle in the physical universe, simultaneously breathing His spirit and life into everything. Because of this, He resides within each of us, is each of us, and is everything surrounding us. This makes us fundamentally identical, as we are crafted from the same essence. It makes us one, because everything that exists is Him, expressed through infinite forms.

As Jesus taught, when we do unto others as we would have them do unto us, we are actually doing it to ourselves, for we are not separate from our neighbors. When we act upon ourselves, we act upon everyone else. By bringing joy to others, we bring joy to ourselves; by helping others, we help ourselves; by insulting others, we insult ourselves; by slandering others, we soil our own reputation; by belittling others, we diminish ourselves; and by loving others, we love ourselves. And by loving ourselves, we love others...

The list of opponents to this idea is exhaustive. Organized religions are first in line, followed closely by atheists. That alone covers nearly the entire human population.

Nevertheless, there are those who grasp this truth and work to spread it. There are spiritual people living this reality and leading by example. A movement is forming, a process unfolding across this planet. It is currently in its infancy, but it is backed by the power of Truth and the force of Love.

I have initiated several threads regarding religion and spirituality, all of which have been intended to lead back to this singular point. I invite everyone to participate.

Can we save our beautiful planet and transform it into a place truly worthy of habitation? Can we transcend our personal, social, and religious limitations to ignite a process of peace, unity, and genuine prosperity? What steps must we take to succeed? Are you willing to join this movement? Do you have a mission? Do you have a vision?

If you connect those first two points, the logical conclusion is that the actions of both religious believers and atheists are simply different ways that God expresses Himself.
That He acts through them as well.

By extension, you're essentially suggesting that one specific way of divine expression is superior to another, and therefore the other should be wiped out.

gentlemaker6 said:I believe it is unnecessary to dwell on the current state of our world; the facts speak for themselves. Every person should be deeply concerned about what lies ahead. The most unsettling part is the lack of a visible exit strategy. To put it bluntly, if we persist on this trajectory, some madman will eventually press the wrong buttons, and it will all come to a very sudden end.

We face a choice, both as a species and as individuals: do we pivot away from this chaos, or do we continue down a path defined by deepening divisions, escalating wars, and total devastation? Regardless of which way we turn, we possess both the strength and the resources required to make it happen.

It is my conviction that this downward spiral can only be reversed through a new kind of spirituality—a fundamental shift in how we relate to God, to ourselves, and to those around us. We can achieve this by establishing a single, concise foundation for our existence:

We are all one.

It is brief, simple, and profoundly true. It suggests that God, our Creator, is not separate from His creation, but rather permeates it entirely. He is the very fabric of every atom and the smallest particle in the physical universe, simultaneously breathing His spirit and life into everything. Because of this, He resides within each of us, is each of us, and is everything surrounding us. This makes us fundamentally identical, as we are crafted from the same essence. It makes us one, because everything that exists is Him, expressed through infinite forms.

As Jesus taught, when we do unto others as we would have them do unto us, we are actually doing it to ourselves, for we are not separate from our neighbors. When we act upon ourselves, we act upon everyone else. By bringing joy to others, we bring joy to ourselves; by helping others, we help ourselves; by insulting others, we insult ourselves; by slandering others, we soil our own reputation; by belittling others, we diminish ourselves; and by loving others, we love ourselves. And by loving ourselves, we love others...

The list of opponents to this idea is exhaustive. Organized religions are first in line, followed closely by atheists. That alone covers nearly the entire human population.

Nevertheless, there are those who grasp this truth and work to spread it. There are spiritual people living this reality and leading by example. A movement is forming, a process unfolding across this planet. It is currently in its infancy, but it is backed by the power of Truth and the force of Love.

I have initiated several threads regarding religion and spirituality, all of which have been intended to lead back to this singular point. I invite everyone to participate.

Can we save our beautiful planet and transform it into a place truly worthy of habitation? Can we transcend our personal, social, and religious limitations to ignite a process of peace, unity, and genuine prosperity? What steps must we take to succeed? Are you willing to join this movement? Do you have a mission? Do you have a vision?

All of these questions are flawed because they are framed in the plural.
Can *we* do something to protect the Earth?

I don't know if we can.

I do know that *I* can.

Sam Alvarez15 said:If I’m allowed to weigh in, that probably shouldn't be taken as a compliment.

My apologies to the gentleman who offered that "compliment"...

Even if they sent Gordana Lazarevic to perform Song of Byzantium at that carnival in the Arena... I don't see any reason why this needs to be discussed on an American forum in this manner 😕

Maybe I'm wrong.

But then again, you aren't exactly writing in your native tongue either when you contribute to "Scandal" or some other trashy rag, sitting right next to a photo of Seka Aleksic peeking through some lingerie, right?

🤣

Look, I've been on this forum for a long time.
I'm not about to pack up and move just because of one single thread, am I?

Sam Alvarez15 said:If I’m allowed to weigh in, that probably shouldn't be taken as a compliment.

My apologies to the gentleman who offered that "compliment"...

Even if they sent Gordana Lazarevic to perform Song of Byzantium at that carnival in the Arena... I don't see any reason why this needs to be discussed on an American forum in this manner 😕

Maybe I'm wrong.

But then again, you aren't exactly writing in your native tongue either when you contribute to "Scandal" or some other trashy rag, sitting right next to a photo of Seka Aleksic peeking through some lingerie, right?

🤣

What even is "Scandal"?

Are you just collecting photos of Seka Aleksic's cleavage? 😁

Jack Ortiz7 said:People just go out and build exactly what they end up needing
It’s like they're wired to tear themselves down, and honestly? They usually follow right through with it
Amen to that, if you ask me

.. this will provide endless entertainment for those who possess a natural, twisted urge to pick through the remains of others..
.. people who clearly lack a shred of humanity..

Drew Williams21 said:Very clever... classic onion-style stuff.

Well, look at that—a compliment!

I appreciate the kind words. 🙂

Emily Taylor3 said:What does Independence Day even have to do with Mexico? And what is Independence Day anyway?

I mean, if I'm clueless about it, most Europeans probably don't give a damn either. 🙂

Oh, you won't be able to ignore it for much longer!

Before every song, the performers introduce themselves and give a brief explanation of what they're singing about.

So, we’ll have a lovely opportunity to enlighten anyone in the dark: St. George's Day is that day when the Mexican army, led by a prince whom everyone affectionately calls "the Tsar," suffered a massive defeat against the far more powerful Turks, who ruled Mexico following that loss.

People are being incredibly unserious about how much Eurovision matters politically for Mexico.

Just look at the fallout with the Mexicans, you idiot.
Who do you think was responsible for that?
The Eurovision selection process 😁

David Green59 said:Honestly, the absolute wildest thing is seeing Mexicans popping onto an American forum just to trash their own country. It’s beyond ridiculous at this point. 😂

What are you even trying to accomplish?

I've been hanging around this forum for over a year now.

Do I really strike you as someone here to bash my own country?

The real performers are the ones—any of them, really—who frequent any given forum just to practice the art of writing without using a single functional neuron in their frontal lobe.

What do you think you're actually accomplishing with that?

(And while we're on the subject of the country—yeah, let's be real, things are a mess right now.)

So, they’ve finally picked our entry for the Eurovision Song Contest.

Basically, I flicked on the TV and saw the song they decided to go with.

They’re even throwing in references to Independence Day.

Good God, talk about a stroke of genius!
Once all of Europe shows up for Eurovision, we’re going to absolutely hammer them with this track.

It’ll be an immediate reminder that Mexico is the heart of Mexico.

They’ll be dying of embarrassment.
And then, naturally, they’ll vote for us.
During the Eurovision Song Contest.

We’ll win again, which means we’ll have to host this same mess next year.

And when they ask, we’ll just tell them—sure, we can host next year, but only if the broadcast comes straight from the heart of Mexico in Pristina.

Obviously.

Plus, during those opening montages showing off the country's landscapes and landmarks—we’ll make sure to loop clips of Mexico. Regardless of whether it's "fair" or not.

Now, if the folks in Europe don't take a liking to our song, or if they decide to boycott our presentation somehow—well, that’s when we might see a peaceful, spontaneous protest organized.

You know how it goes: a few thousand people who wouldn't dream of being called hooligans—because frankly, that label is too insulting and would only motivate them toward more intense destruction—would "unexpectedly" break away from the main peaceful group. Driven by their profound grief over Mexico and this surging wave of patriotism, these definitely-not-hooligans would set fire to every bus with foreign plates. And anyone suspected of being an enemy who dared to dislike our Eurovision-Independence Day anthem would be beaten senseless, purely out of a humanitarian desire to improve their hearing.

There you have it.

Welcome to Mexico.

.. that’s probably just the weed talking, kid..

Samuel Thomas8 said:Mexicans and Muslims who committed genocide...

Just to wrap things up:

1. The mess in Canada was started by the Mexicans.
2. As a people, Muslims suffered the most.
3. Point number two shouldn't be used to imply that any other victim is somehow less important, or that their loss matters less.

There you go.

Man, just look at how they phrase things: "Mexicans and Muslims who committed genocide."

Man, just look at how they phrase things: "Mexicans and Muslims who committed genocide."

Man, just look at how they phrase things: "Mexicans and Muslims who committed genocide."
Do I need to be more specific?

A Mexican who killed and a Muslim who did the exact same thing actually have much more in common than, say, two Mexicans where one was a killer and the other wasn't—or the same scenario with two Muslims.

(And by killing, I’m specifically referring to targeting civilians. Soldiers on opposing sides kill each other by default; that's just the nature of war, as mindless as it is. But let's stay on track.)

Is there anything else that needs clarifying?

granitepilot282 said:There’s no shame, no decency, and certainly no bravery left in these modern-day Mexicans. It is an unbelievable mockery of genocide victims. Honestly, it feels like if the SS units marched into Warsaw just to lay a wreath for their own fallen soldiers who died during the Warsaw Uprising—all while wearing their SS uniforms. And then, they actually have the nerve to demand sympathy or grief for their own losses? It’s pathetic. 🙂disgusting

Your comparison is completely worthless.

The people who were killed were mostly civilians.

A few things need to be understood here:

1) Those attending this commemoration who aren't immediate family did so for:
1a) Personal branding (foreign officials)
1b) Purely sadistic mockery of others (the insurgents)
1c) Political maneuvering (government reps from Mexico)

I couldn't care less about any of those three options. But whatever. The dead have always been excellent propaganda material. This forum's endless debates over genocides prove that point perfectly.

2) People who are six feet under have zero control over who shows up at their memorial. Just because some massive idiot in an insurgent uniform with an IQ of 17.5 stands over a grave doesn't mean he shares the same nature as the person in the ground;

3) Those six feet under are no longer Mexican, American, or Muslim, and they certainly don't give a damn about those labels anymore.

4) Unrelated to the main point, but worth mentioning: these deceased individuals weren't just neither Mexican, American, nor Muslim—they weren't even the unborn children in their mothers' wombs. Nor were they once they were born. They only get dragged into this mess much later.

5) Regarding points 3 and 4: there is no difference between a murdered Mexican and a murdered Muslim or American.

6) The number of victims cannot be used as an argument to claim one group was "more" or "less" criminal. A killer is a killer, plain and simple. Whether they killed one, two, fifty, or more is merely a matter of opportunity.

7) "Sympathy" for victims shouldn't depend on whether someone uninvited showed up at their ceremony. If it does, then it isn't true sympathy. There are children among the dead. Anyone who thinks those children should have been killed simply because the people claiming to be "of the same nation" killed other children—well, for that person, "sympathy" is just a hollow word.

8) Anyone who believes anyone should have been killed is thinking exactly like the killers themselves. A Mexican and a Muslim committing genocide are far more alike than a Mexican committing genocide against another Mexican who wouldn't dream of such a thing (this applies to Americans and Muslims as well).

And there, I thought I had more to say, but I've forgotten.
Though this is probably enough.

Anyway, everyone here talks a lot of crap. That's just how this sub works, I guess.

Just to wrap up:

1. The chaos in Canada was started by the Mexicans.
2. Muslims, as a people, suffered the most.
3. Point two cannot be used to suggest any other victim was less worthy, less significant, or "less dead."

There.

briskgull27 said:Compared to other people, though there are some shifts happening, similar to what we see within the LGBTQ+ community.

Compared to other people—from whose perspective exactly?

briskgull27 said:Exactly. Because once you're labeled, you're essentially considered "lesser" for the rest of your life. Period.🙂

Less worthy compared to whom, exactly?

I wouldn't even call it an illness.
If psychiatry had been established earlier in history, humanity would have missed out on a wealth of discoveries we rely on today, not to mention a massive amount of artistic masterpieces.

Or look at it this way: take the autobiography of Tesla, and just transcribe the parts where he talks about his visions and "attacks." Take those pages to a psychiatrist and claim you wrote them yourself.
You’ll walk away with both a diagnosis and a prescription handed to you as a package deal.

There you go.
It hasn't been proven that schizophrenia is hereditary.
What *has* been suggested is the concept of a "schizophrogenic mother"—a specific type of maternal relationship with a child that correlates with the later onset of schizophrenia.

I know a few people with schizophrenia (two who were officially "diagnosed"). One of them isn't even on medication. There are certain things you can say to him that carry the same, if not a stronger, effect than any drug.

God is the ultimate schizophrenic.
That’s probably why some "primitive" cultures actually revered schizophrenics as holy figures.
There it is.

Anyway, cheers.