Did the brawl in paradise actually happen?
in Psychology ·
Kyle Lee7 said:I'm doing just fine, thanks for asking. We’re having a discussion here, and if you happen to interpret that as a personal critique or an attack on you, well, that's really on you, not me.
I honestly have no idea how you were raised, what your life looks like now, or where your issues might stem from—and frankly, I'm not interested in digging into that.
If we're being completely honest, my own family was far from perfect either. My parents definitely had their flaws, but they didn't make one crucial mistake: they never laid a hand on me or used physical punishment, and for that, I am truly grateful.
At the end of the day, nobody is perfect. Maybe one day I'll lose my cool and snap at my own child, but that wouldn't make me an abusive person. My point here is about principles and core values. To actually understand whether an action is right or wrong, you have to break it down and look at the actual causes and effects.
The reality is that children are born good. They aren't inherently bad or "broken" people that need to be fixed. Any developmental psychologist in the US will tell you that almost any problematic behavior in a child is simply a reaction to conflict within the family. Children REACT. As adults, we should know better—we *must* know better. It's much easier to resort to force than to stop and ask, "How did MY actions contribute to this situation?"
Sorry, but I’m not taking this personally at all. You didn't actually grasp the point; you just got offended.
Quincy:
| In a functional household with parents who actually know how to handle kids, there's no need for corporal punishment. |
You should really watch your mouth when using the word "abnormal"—I highly doubt you have enough expertise to decide what qualifies as normal and what doesn't.
And yeah, discipline is always necessary. Any decent psychologist will tell you that—but then again, the way you define "discipline" is a whole different story.