brightsurfer4 said:Regarding the title—honestly, I was hoping there was some deeper, smarter explanation I just missed. It feels like people are taking Fish Tank way too seriously. I’m actually a big fan of Haneke’s whole philosophy that film and art should be about asking difficult questions, but this? Fish Tank is just trying to shock the audience, and frankly, it fails. They wrote Lolita ages ago.
As for the documentaries in the main lineup—I don't think there's even a basis for comparison here.
Look, the real question is what you're even using as a benchmark when you're comparing feature films, given how massive the variety is, but I think this is a bit of an apples-to-oranges situation...
Well, you definitely missed it. You asked why it’s called Fish Tank and mentioned how those "subtle allegories and metaphors don't really click with your anatomy."
But there's zero subtlety here. And that’s the issue. The movie isn't even trying to shock you; it’s just being incredibly blunt about everything. But it's nothing like "Lolita"—that's a totally different beast where the "little girl" is worlds apart from this one. This girl acts tough on the outside but she’s actually naive and fragile at her core. Lolita looks innocent and sweet on the surface, but she knows exactly what she's doing. We're talking about two completely different things here...
It’s a movie where things play out realistically, yet somehow land on a positive note. She could have killed that kid and destroyed herself in the process. He could have killed her. She could have settled for being a dancer in some bottom-tier go-go bar. She could have quit dancing entirely and realized she'd make more money from older guys looking to escape their boring family routines.
But instead, a hit to the head snaps her awake, and she chooses the "road less traveled"... walking away from her apathetic mother, the old man, the stagnant surroundings, and leaving with someone her own age to try and actually build a life for herself.
If you realize that the United States has massive issues with teen pregnancy, especially when you consider how certain social safety nets can unintentionally encourage dependency, or if you see how cities like New York are filled with teenagers navigating cycles of poverty passed down from parents who chose the path of least resistance... if you understand all that context, then you have to admit this film is asking real questions. In that sense, everything lands exactly where it should.
What really bugs me, though, is how painfully obvious the metaphors and parallels are... they're just glaringly obvious.