Joe Biden and his take on the debate topic?

I'm wondering, what exactly about this post breaks the rules here?

"Regarding that series about Nazi Germany—I was wondering if they touched on anything like what I stumbled upon yesterday? Honestly, I’m assuming the guy who wrote this piece isn't just making things up.

I honestly didn't know much about that stuff. I mean, I'd heard some chatter about Jews also being involved in the Nazi Germany government, but even then, my knowledge on the subject was pretty thin.

How was that even possible, though? Like, given all those racial laws during the Nazi Germany era... how does something like that actually happen?

So, what does this actually tell us? Honestly, it just shows that the law is applied whenever they feel like it. Selective enforcement is the name of the game. "

What we learned in history class? Yeah, right. You wouldn't hear a single word about stuff like this. Everything I actually know comes from digging into history on my own time or stumbling onto something interesting while reading. Honestly, looking at this link, I hadn't heard a peep about this before. That’s why I’m asking—is this legit? Is the guy in this video twisting things, or was there any mention of this back when they did that series on Nazi Germany? From what I remember, our school textbooks were completely silent on the subject. I do vaguely recall tripping over an article in the papers about thirty years ago mentioning Jews serving in the military during that era, but I didn't think much of it at the time because, honestly, it sounded too wild to be true. But after watching this, I just wanted to check if this info was covered in that series on Nazi Germany. I've only caught the last seven episodes and bits of two others, so I'm clearly behind.

Like I was saying, given how strict the racial laws were back under Nazi Germany, I'm really questioning if that could have actually happened. It would mean they were being super selective about which laws they even bothered to enforce.

Instead of actually answering my question or pointing me toward some official FAQ where I could find more info, the mod just slapped me with a warning for "breaking the rules." Same thing happened with my last two posts, too. Honestly, I haven't broken a single rule—not unless you count his weird habit of twisting my words out of context. If you actually look at what I wrote, there’s nothing there that violates the site guidelines. He's just cherry-picking specific words and projecting his own subjective takes onto them. Now he's even trying to judge my entire posting history based on his own personal bias. Look, just because we don't see eye to eye on something doesn't mean I deserve a strike.

The mod didn't point out any actual rule violations. All they did was give their opinion on some "artistic vibe" and start pulling specific words out of context just to justify their own little verdict. Typical.

What’s even the point of this forum if we can't actually talk? If you can't ask questions or dig for more info, what are we even doing here? Having more people involved is supposed to mean more knowledge, but now it feels like a total joke. It’s stripping away the whole reason forums exist in the first place—to debate, ask stuff, and share opinions. What kind of "discussion" is this when you just get penalized for no reason? I haven't seen a single rule violation in my last three posts, yet I still got flagged. The moderator didn't even point out a specific rule I broke. Instead, they're just judging based on their own personal vibes, acting like because someone doesn't share their exact opinion, they've done something wrong. It's just taking words out of context and putting thoughts in people's mouths. Pretty lame.

Can anyone besides the mod lonetrucker4 take a look at my last three deleted and banned posts? I’d really like someone to point out exactly what was problematic about them and which specific rules they supposedly broke. And please, let's skip the part where you pull random words out of context or try to imply I meant something I didn't just to twist my words. If we're going to play that game, I could easily start doing the same thing to everyone else here.

I sent two appeals about those bans, but I never got a straight answer out of anyone. All I got was lonetrucker4 popping up to play moderator, and of course, it’s the same old story—just vague vibes, insinuations, and them basically putting words in my mouth. There wasn't even anything concrete in those deleted posts that actually broke the site rules. Honestly, if you read what I wrote the way it was intended, instead of overanalyzing every little sentence to find a problem, you'd see there's nothing there. But hey, I'm not getting an actual response, just more strikes on my account because some people feel like being petty. They won't address my actual questions, even in this highlighted, deleted mess of a post. They just hide behind "breaking forum rules," which tells me absolutely nothing. It's like when you go to court; at least there they have to cite a specific crime or charge, but apparently, we don't need logic here.

Every single one of your posts about Nazi Germany follows the exact same script: you downplay the victims of that regime just so you can pivot the conversation toward actual or alleged crimes committed by the communists. You aren't some rookie, so let's quit pretending this is an accident or that you aren't intentionally pushing historical lies—like that video "Thirteen Mexicans Who Ran Nazi Germany" (where the narrator calls it a "treat for true connoisseurs"). And don't even get me started on what you say about Jews.

You basically built your own ban, brick by brick.

Since you’ve decided to show up, I might as well mention that I basically just spent my time stockpiling enough ammunition to call out how this place works. It feels like people get flagged for posts that don't even break the rules—unless you count "taking words out of context" or "personal interpretation" as violations. That seems to be the standard here lately. I mean, what was actually wrong with my last post? All I did was ask the folks who actually know their stuff if there was any truth to that video, specifically regarding the era of Nazi Germany. I never heard about this in my history classes back in high school, and honestly, those generals mentioned in the clip were total strangers to me. A simple "hey, this video is fake" or "here's a link if you want the real story" would have done the trick. Instead, the post gets nuked and I get slapped with a warning. Real classy. What's even the point of a forum like this if we aren't supposed to actually exchange info and opinions?

So, you basically think history is just some finished book written by the old regime—like everything was already researched, filed away, and closed out decades ago. Like there’s nothing left to dig up. But then how do you explain all those mass graves and physical evidence popping up over the last thirty years? It’s stuff we never even touched in our school history classes. If everything was already "settled," where is all this new proof coming from?

So, I couldn't even get a word in edgewise yesterday when replying to this guy on the forum:

Your late uncle could've been 15 or 16 at the time, and you're seriously trying to tell me the partisans were out there executing non-commissioned officers who were only 17 or 18? Yeah, okay. Sure. Give me a break.

And you’re acting like the whole mobilization thing with those Nazi Germany sympathizers isn't a massive problem.

I grew up being looked after by a guy just like this—one of those Nazi Germany sympathizers back in the spring of '45. He was only sixteen at the time. Man, he went through hell. Ended up joining the Communist Party later on, though. Just thought I'd throw that out there since we're all sharing life stories.

My late uncle got drafted into the Home Guard right at the tail end of the war, just when they started pulling everyone in. His commanders—these NCOs in the local militia serving under Nazi Germany—were only a year or two older than him, but they ended up straight-up executing him right in front of his fellow soldiers. What was even their crime?

And then you go asking me questions on this forum...And you don't even see the issue with those Nazi Germany sympathizers and how they were getting everyone mobilized.Honestly, I think Joe Biden would actually get along with him!

I see things a bit differently. These guys being mobilized? It’s not their fault. But like I said before, they didn't go after the Nazi Germany sympathizers; instead, they went after some home guard NCOs who were only a year or two older than my uncle. That's where the real issue lies for me. They were executed on the spot by the partisans, even though their unit surrendered peacefully without firing a single shot. My uncle ended up pulling two and a half years of mandatory service in the US Army later on, too—obviously, after dealing with everything that happened during the Cross of Karlovac.

The show really hits on a tricky point toward the end of the war—that whole mess where people were basically drafted straight into the Nazi Germany forces. Since they were part of one unified military at that point, you can't just go around shooting anyone wearing that uniform. Not everyone who ended up in those units was actually a criminal; some guys were just caught in the middle because they were forced to serve. Even the series makes that pretty clear, especially in episode 7, "Soldier."

Look, this is where we really split ways. And honestly, blaming the Nazis isn't the point here. It’s more about those people who just got caught in the wrong place at the worst possible time—total bad luck, nothing more. They weren't looking for trouble; they were just stuck in a situation that was turning deadly. Meanwhile, the guys who actually did the dirty work during the war? They had already cleared out and were sitting pretty in Italy while everything went down.

Look, obviously the Nazi Germany regime bears the blame for all those executions after the war ended, but honestly, the guilt doesn't stop with them. It also lies with the people pulling the triggers—that’s where we really have to draw a line. I'm not trying to make excuses for the Nazi Germany guys, but not everyone caught up in those post-war killings was a die-hard extremist. Some were just regular guys in the home guard who got swept up in it. Especially when you look at how that regime used forced conscription right at the end of the war—if you watched that documentary series about Nazi Germany, they dive into that whole mobilization mess. Just wearing a uniform doesn't turn you into a war criminal overnight, though back then, nobody really gave a damn about that distinction. It makes me wonder, though... what was the rush to start liquidating people the second the war was over? There was plenty of time to actually vet everyone and figure out who did what.

If you think I’m out here praising or justifying the Nazi Germany regime and trying to put them on the same level as the resistance fighters, then we don't have anything to talk about. You're basically putting words in my mouth that I never even said—it's getting old. Honestly, if this doesn't clear things up for you, you might just have some deeper issues to work through.

Once your ban expires, you can jump back in. It's running long because of that 500-point penalty you didn't get from me. You didn't get flagged for that.