Are most women attracted to or repelled by testicles?

It’s common knowledge that plenty of guys watch videos or look at photos of vulvas and vaginas for masturbation purposes.

So, I wanted to open up a discussion here regarding that specific behavior;

What percentage of women would say they watch images or videos of penises and testicles to masturbate?


Look, this is an anonymous poll—so women shouldn't feel pressured by what anyone else thinks about them. I'm just hoping for some honesty so we can get a realistic sense of the majority preference—specifically whether they actually like testicles or not.

Since the voting is anonymous, there's no way to tell if more men or women are participating. Therefore, if the guys really want to weigh in, feel free to vote based on what you assume the female majority prefers—whether they're into testicles or they aren't.

Man, Silvio, I just want to give you a huge hug like two old friends celebrating a win. Your buddy, Father Mark...

Carl Mitchell31 said:Brother Silvio, let’s just embrace like two good friends. Your buddy, Father Mark.

Absolutely.

Are priests actually allowed to wear leggings where you can see their junk?

I honestly don't think women care about looking at testicles at all.

Jeremy Johnson18 said:I honestly don't think women care about seeing guys' junk at all.

I’ve heard the same thing from plenty of women—that they aren't interested in seeing a guy's anatomy through his gym leggings—but let's be real: if they actually wanted to see what men are hiding, they could easily pull that move if they were looking to assert some kind of sexual dominance. It makes me wonder—do you think these pandemics happen by pure chance, or is this some cosmic reaction to the fact that we're living in a period where women are hyper-exposed while men are increasingly trying to hide their masculinity? This imbalance totally disrupts the biological and social equilibrium between the sexes. We didn't deal with global outbreaks back when men were more willing to show who they were. Is it possible the pandemic hit right when the scales tipped—when men started covering up while women pushed for exclusive visibility?

Look, I set up this specific thread to act as an alternative astrological hub—a way for me to better track and interpret massive global shifts. As an independent astrologer, I’ve laid out my full perspective right here: http://www.alternativa-forum.com/ast...roskopu-4.html. Of course, the mainstream labels astrology as "pseudoscience," which is just typical.
The old-school, establishment astrologers—those rigid gatekeepers who refuse to look at anything outside their textbooks—flat-out reject my theories without even bothering to vet them. And just as importantly,
not a single "serious" scientist has actually applied rigorous statistical testing or the scientific method to my framework. So, essentially, when scientists talk about my work, they aren't actually talking about my theory—they know absolutely nothing about it.

They aren't much for looking, but they certainly have a nose for it.

Walter Baker2 said:They don't care to look, but they love the scent.

Does that imply women are more likely to be with men at night than during the day?

Did Al Dent actually include the link in his post here



did he actually manage to nail how women think

or did he completely miss the mark on the female psyche?

silverwolf88 (No input provided to rewrite.)
Did Al Dent include that link in his post?



He actually managed to crack the code on how women think—quite impressively, if you ask me.

Or did he simply fail to grasp the female perspective?

Al Dent doesn't possess much capacity for critical thought—therefore, he wasn't in any position to make an accurate call. 😁

Hey Silvio,
I know you used to post on the Index forums back in the day. If you're interested in picking up where you left off, most of the old crew hangs out over on the Assembly Discord server now. Here’s an invite link if you want to check it out...
When you sign up, just make sure to use your old Index username so people actually recognize you.
Discord link:

https://discord.gg/WRWEvQTZDV

Brian Mitchell52 said:Hey Silvio,
I know you used to post on the Index forums. If you’re interested in keeping the conversation going over on the Assembly Discord—where most of the old Index crowd moved—here’s an invite link...
When you sign up, just make sure to use your recognizable Index username so we know who you are.
Discord link:

https://discord.gg/WRWEvQTZDV

Does this Discord have any actual ties to Index? And is Index, as a media outlet, actually willing to expose
corrupt officials in our institutions? Also, would Index be interested in exposing the people Garofeeder is connected to regarding those things he wrote about me personally?

Can I use an alternative account on Discord to discuss my mathematical calculations?

My interests lie in math and astronomy. Since I happen to be a male gender minority wearing leggings at 22, I don't attract a single woman, so I have nothing else to write about on these forums except astrology, mathematics, and leggings—which eventually devolves into topics about testicles due to the discrimination I face.

What happens if I run into the same issues on Discord as I did on that forum because of my leggings?

If I post about astrology, will I be discriminated against just for being a man, considering almost everyone in American astrology is female?

To be honest, staying on that forum isn't worth it anymore. I deal with too much harassment; after the Index forums shut down, many of the women who targeted me for wearing leggings seem to have migrated to this new forum, where they've taken charge along with their male counterparts. That's why I show up less often, though I still pop in because I refuse to let them discriminate against me as a male gender minority in leggings. That's why I start these polls.

You mentioned that most users are former Index members, but I have zero desire to join a forum populated by women who already gave me grief for being a guy in leggings. So thanks for the offer, but

I'm done with this double standard where women are allowed to wear leggings because they don't have testicles, while

men aren't allowed to wear them because they do. I don't want to deal with rooms like ,

and it took me two years just to reach a point where they weren't constantly discriminating against me or calling me crazy. I have no intention of repeating that cycle on Discord—especially if those same Index women are lurking there.

My inbox is overflowing, but I'm not deleting anything. I need that paper trail as evidence of all the bans I received for "trolling" about leggings, and proof of how many female moderators vs. male moderators handed them out.

silverwolf88 said:So, does this mean women are more likely to be with men at night rather than during the day?

It’s the scent that pulls them in, day or night. Looks don't amount to a lick of difference here.

Walter Baker2 said:The scent draws them in day and night—visuals aren't even part of the equation.

Look, if they’re supposedly "turned off" by seeing testicles, then logically—since eyesight isn't exactly peak performance in the dark—they should be much more inclined to hang out with guys at night.

Or are you suggesting that wearing baggy pants provides some kind of tactical cover, making it easier to be around them?

But let's follow that flawed logic to its conclusion: if you hook up with someone and strip down during the day, she’s going to have a much clearer view than she would at night. So, by your reasoning, it would actually be easier for a guy to get lucky after dark—assuming the lights stay off, of course, because that’s when the "view" is minimized.

If women still find testicles unappealing—which seems to be the consensus in most female circles, assuming they aren't just exaggerating—then what's the endgame? Are men going to start castrating themselves once they've passed on their genes just to increase their social standing with women?
Or will medical science eventually develop some kind of way to fix testicular artery issues so men aren't viewed as socially inferior to women?

Speaking as an alternative astrologer, I have to wonder where the human race is headed if men are losing social value due to this specific anatomical issue. Is the male gender even going to survive into the future?

On the flip side, I’m looking at the logic here: if women view themselves as being more valuable than dogs—yet they are usually the first ones to go running to a dog for companionship—how can they claim to be superior to men while simultaneously avoiding being the first to reach out to them?

Is the reason women in leggings are perceived as more valuable than men in leggings simply because they lack testicles?

silverwolf88 said:If they’re so bothered by seeing junk, then logically—since vision isn't exactly peak performance in the dark compared to the daytime—they should just stick to hanging out with guys at night.

Or what, you think wearing baggy cargo pants makes it easier to be around them because they can't see anything?

But then again, if you actually hook up with someone and strip down during the day, she’s going to have a much clearer view than if you did it at night. So, following that flawed logic, it would actually be easier for a guy to get lucky at night, provided the lights are off and her visibility is compromised.

Personally, I keep the lights on when I'm having sex, so there's no darkness in my house. Honestly, forget it—women aren't exactly known for being logical.

Walter Baker2 said:I play it straight—no secrets here—but honestly, just let them be. Women can be pretty irrational sometimes.

That’s why it’s smarter for men to just move from one relationship to the next instead of getting tied down in a marriage.

Anthony Nguyen81 said:Al Dent doesn't have a clue how to think straight—so there was zero chance he'd get it right 😁

Al Dent just twisted my story to fit whatever narrative he wanted

silverwolf88 said:That’s why it’s smarter for men to just cycle through different women instead of being tied down to one wife in a marriage.

Brava, you hit the nail on the head. Only problem is they won't let you do that whether you're married or single; they basically put a padlock on the whole situation and only hand out keys to the models and the supermodels, while the rest of us just get left out in the cold.

Walter Baker2 said:Bravo—you hit the nail on the head. Except they don't let anyone in, whether you're married or single; they basically put a padlock on the whole damn thing and only let the models and supermodels through. The rest of us? We're just left out in the cold.

But look, I don't stand a chance with the unattractive women, nor the older ones, nor the plus-sized ones—so clearly, I must be beyond hideous. Maybe it's my anatomy; maybe I'm just built wrong down there.