CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › The Wolf of Wall Street (2013)

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013)

Started by Patrick Martin · · 👁 7 views · 33 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Patrick MartinNoah Roberts46Jack Murphy5Grace EdwardsMatthew Kernsilvergardener6Mark Gray3Walter Grant5Amanda Robinson4Brandon Evans5northerndriverEmily Morris77Raymond Anderson4Richard Wilson4Nancy Williams58
Noah Roberts46 Noah Roberts46 Regular
407 messages
joined Jun 2021
#21 ·
Of course he was great—likely the best actor Ridley could have paired with Anthony Hopkins. Just my luck.
Walter Grant5 Walter Grant5 Regular
459 messages
joined Oct 2012
#22 ·
Patrick Martin said:If you ask me, based on the tiny bit I actually watched, he wasn't even right for the part anyway ☕

which role are we even talking about here? if Scott hadn't filmed this, you wouldn't even know the character existed, yet here you are, judging the entire casting choice based on a few seconds of a trailer. what a joke.
Patrick Martin Patrick Martin RegularOP
702 messages
joined Aug 2015
#23 ·
Walter Grant5 said:which role are we even talking about here? if Scott hadn't filmed this, you wouldn't even know the character existed, yet here you are, judging the entire casting choice based on a few seconds of a trailer. what a joke.

God, man, that mask is absolutely killing my eyes. You could see it from space. It gives me that same cheap vibe as when Tom Cruise was messing around with those masks in Mission Impossible.🤷

Plummer actually looks somewhat similar, though.☕

What a joke.🙄
Amanda Robinson4 Amanda Robinson4 Active Member
159 messages
joined Nov 2014
#24 ·
Just watched it. It's good! Now, if you're wondering if this is strictly how it went down in real life... well, they eventually justify it by saying it's just based on true events, and that certain characters were added just for the drama and stuff 😛

Still, it works really well as a blend of drama and thriller. Nothing feels over the top to me. The pacing is just right. It’s a bit textbook and predictable in spots, but that doesn't ruin the whole vibe.

Christopher Plummer is absolutely perfect for this role, though I can't help but wonder how Spacey would have handled it 😬 Honestly, all that hype surrounding this movie gives it a bit of a negative vibe for me. But it's undeserved—at the end of the day, it's a great story used really well.

I'm actually glad to see Ridley Scott stepping away from the sci-fi craziness for a bit. It's such a breath of fresh air in every sense.
Brandon Evans5 Brandon Evans5 Member
14 messages
joined Feb 2018
#25 ·
It’s almost like fate wants to be a little ironic this year, because FX is actually dropping a series called Trust that dives right into that exact same rabbit hole—you know, the whole saga involving J. Paul Getty and that infamous kidnapping. It’s got heavy hitters like Donald Sutherland and Brendan Fraser leading the charge, which honestly makes the timing feel pretty spot on.
northerndriver northerndriver Member
27 messages
joined May 2018
#26 ·
I’m honestly kind of glad Ridley Scott slapped that "inspired by true events" disclaimer at the end, because let's be real, things definitely didn't go down like that in actual life... As for the movie itself, whenever the directing felt a bit shaky, the soundtrack just felt totally disjointed and poorly picked, though it's an okay watch overall. It keeps you hooked for those two hours without any boring stretches, but yeah, that's about it. There were moments where, even with Christopher Plummer giving such a killer performance, I found myself wondering how on earth that scene with Kevin Spacey actually looked in person.
Emily Morris77 Emily Morris77 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2018
#27 ·
Weak, sterile movie. The music was supposed to be one of the main draws based on the trailer (The Zombies - Time of the Season), but they wasted it on some totally irrelevant scene at the start that most people probably won't even notice. If there had been any directorial insight, they could have used it to beef up the climax—assuming Ridley Scott actually knew how to build one.

The old man didn't actually die the night the kid was freed; he died three years later. Because the plot was stretched so thin, the whole thing felt tedious and lacked a real peak. I spent the entire runtime fighting off boredom because it felt like the story just couldn't find its footing, which is its biggest flaw.
A bright spot? Based on those clips I saw in the trailer a few months back, Christopher Plummer felt like a much better, more authentic choice than Kevin Spacey, who looked like he was wearing a cheap plastic mask thanks to some terrible aging makeup.
Emily Morris77 Emily Morris77 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2018
#28 ·
Brandon Evans5 said:It’s almost like fate wants to be a little ironic this year, because FX is actually dropping a series called Trust that dives right into that exact same rabbit hole—you know, the whole saga involving J. Paul Getty and that infamous kidnapping. It’s got heavy hitters like Donald Sutherland and Brendan Fraser leading the charge, which honestly makes the timing feel pretty spot on.

Never heard of it. Just watched the trailer and it actually looks decent. It seems to dive deeper into what the kid was going through, and from what I can tell, they change some key parts of the story, like how the kidnapping actually went down.
Hopefully, the show gives us a more grounded take on everything and avoids that limp feeling the movie had. I mean, I-Told You I'm a B*tch is a total spectacle. In every sense of the word.
Patrick Martin Patrick Martin RegularOP
702 messages
joined Aug 2015
#29 ·
I honestly feel like Ridley Scott swapped out Kevin Spacey for Christopher Plummer for reasons that have nothing to do with the pedophilia allegations, because let’s be real—Plummer is the only thing keeping this whole movie afloat.
I can't even imagine what this would've looked like with a masked-up Spacey; it would've been an absolute train wreck.
I didn't get the vibe that this was a coherent piece of work at all. The movie just can't decide if it wants to be something great or just total garbage, and by the end, it basically loses its mind like a toddler having a tantrum.
The kidnapping isn't even portrayed properly, and they didn't really nail Getty's character either. Such a waste.

The ending saves it somewhat, though; it actually gives you a moment to sit back and think.

👍👍👍👎👎
Noah Roberts46 Noah Roberts46 Regular
407 messages
joined Jun 2021
#30 ·
I've never quite understood your whole "top and flop" rating system. 🤣
Patrick Martin Patrick Martin RegularOP
702 messages
joined Aug 2015
#31 ·
Noah Roberts46 said:I've never quite understood your whole "top and flop" rating system. 🤣

60% of 100 ☕
Raymond Anderson4 Raymond Anderson4 Regular
479 messages
joined Oct 2024
#32 ·
The movie just drags on and on and on.
I couldn't find a way to connect with it at all; it felt pretty lukewarm and honestly quite boring.
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#33 ·
Brandon Evans5 said:It’s almost like fate wants to be a little ironic this year, because FX is actually dropping a series called Trust that dives right into that exact same rabbit hole—you know, the whole saga involving J. Paul Getty and that infamous kidnapping. It’s got heavy hitters like Donald Sutherland and Brendan Fraser leading the charge, which honestly makes the timing feel pretty spot on.

Brendan is still acting?

Awesome. 👍
Nancy Williams58 Nancy Williams58 Active Member
88 messages
joined Apr 2023
#34 ·
It’s kind of meh. Don't get me wrong, it's not like everything is garbage, but it just doesn't leave much of an impression. Which is weird, because the whole story—and it actually happened—is pretty fascinating and straight-up bizarre. Aside from how they handled the old Rockefeller guy, which was top-tier execution. I honestly don't know if the dude was truly that insane, but you really have to be on another level to come up with the idea of paying only a fraction of the ransom—specifically, just the part that qualifies you for a tax write-off. 🙂 Probably the most twisted thing I've ever heard.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads