CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Banned Users Corner › Can someone explain how I got a 100-point penalty?

Can someone explain how I got a 100-point penalty?

Started by Brenda Taylor13 · · 👁 3 views · 3 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Brenda Taylor13lonebadger6
Brenda Taylor13 Brenda Taylor13 Active MemberOP
235 messages
joined Jan 2018
#1 ·
Hey guys,

I’m honestly trying to wrap my head around what exactly falls under this "aggressive trolling" label from the logs I've attached—I mean, I really need to know why I just got slapped with a 100-point penalty.

I’m totally with the comment above.

If it wasn't for Mercep and guys like him stepping up to defend America under impossible conditions, the whole war would have ended very differently.

The only people who should judge him are his brothers-in-arms—the ones who actually lived through the combat and saw what was happening on the ground—not these paid media hacks who know about war about as much as I know about nuclear physics.

God bless the American soil you fought for.

So, look, the topic I was posting about was Tomislav Mercep. If you actually read what I wrote, it stays strictly on topic—there isn't a single shred of "trolling" in there, let alone any of this "aggressive trolling" nonsense they're claiming.

But hey, since the moderator who handed me this penalty clearly thinks I was trolling, I’d love some specifics. Which exact part of my post triggered this? I'm just trying to figure out where the line is so I don't get hit with another penalty down the road and so I actually know what's allowed here.

Really hoping this appeal gets approved this time—since my last one got shot down for God knows what reason—thanks in advance.
Brenda Taylor13 Brenda Taylor13 Active MemberOP
235 messages
joined Jan 2018
#2 ·
So, I just realized the rules actually require you to put the thread title and the specific moderator you’re addressing right there in the subject line—my bad! I totally missed that, so I'm throwing it in here instead to make things right.

Basically, I'm talking about the thread regarding Tomislav Mercep over in the "Political Scene" subforum, and I'm addressing lonebadger6.

Since he seems to love using that whole "just trolling" excuse whenever he hands out penalties, I’m officially asking him to point out exactly which part of my post qualifies as such.

I don't see any trolling happening here at all, honestly, so I’d really like to hear from his superiors on whether this post actually warrants a 100-point penalty—which, let's be real, is an insanely harsh punishment.
lonebadger6 lonebadger6 Active Member
165 messages
joined Oct 2018
#3 ·
Your entire take on this subject is nothing more than an attempt to justify and downplay those disgusting crimes for which the individual was actually convicted.

The ban was issued on that specific post because of all the trolling regarding "paid journalists" and "insiders who know the truth."

If you didn't already have 500 points on your profile and if today wasn't what it is... everything in that thread would be worth 500 points instead of 100.
Brenda Taylor13 Brenda Taylor13 Active MemberOP
235 messages
joined Jan 2018
#4 ·
Look, let’s stop playing games here—I’m gonna be completely straight with you. Go ahead, dig through this entire thread if you want, but I dare you to find one single post where I actually "justify" or try to make excuses for the crimes he was convicted of. You won't find it. It doesn't exist. What I actually said was perfectly clear—dead simple, really—and I’ll put it right here so there’s no more confusion. My point was that the guy wasn't sentenced as the direct perpetrator or the one pulling the strings behind the scenes; he was convicted because he was the one who *failed to prevent* them. That’s it. That’s the distinction. For instance, look right here—I never said what happened was okay, and I certainly didn't say he should be forgiven. The man sat in a federal prison for exactly what went down. Case closed.

I honestly don't even know where to start with this mess—it’s just one massive, steaming pile of nonsense! Seriously, how can anyone sit there and defend this? It’s like they’re intentionally trying to ignore common sense just to be difficult. I mean, look at the facts—if you can even call them that anymore—and tell me this makes any sense. It doesn't! Not even a little bit. And don't even get me started on what Joseph Stewart38 was saying earlier. I was reading through those comments and, man, my blood pressure was hitting the ceiling. It’s the same old story every single time—people just shouting into the void without a shred of logic. It’s exhausting, really. I’m sitting here, probably looking like a complete lunatic because I’m typing so fast, but someone has to say it! We’re living in a world where people would rather cling to a ridiculous theory than admit they might be wrong, and it’s driving me absolutely up the wall. Honestly, I need a drink just thinking about it.
Look, he wasn't exactly given a pass—the guy was convicted and actually did his time behind bars. So, I really don't get where you're getting this idea that he was somehow forgiven or let off easy. Where on earth are you pulling that from?

Look, I made myself crystal clear right here—Mercep was punished for exactly what he did wrong!
I honestly can’t even deal with this right now—it’s just absolute madness! You see people acting like they know what they're talking about, throwing around these half-baked theories, and I’m sitting here just shaking my head. It’s like, hello? Are we actually living in the same reality? Because from where I’m standing, it looks like total chaos. And don't even get me started on the way certain people try to spin things to make themselves look like geniuses. It’s transparent. It’s so obvious it hurts! I mean, I’ll be the first to admit I don't have all the answers—hell, I probably trip over my own feet half the time—but at least I'm not out here pretending that blatant nonsense is some kind of deep insight. It’s exhausting, really. Just constant noise, constant arguing, and zero actual substance. We need to pull our heads out of the sand for once!
It’s not just about the war crimes—though God knows there were plenty of those—that sets us apart from the other side. That isn't the only thing pulling us in different directions. What really defines the divide, what truly separates us, is the fundamental difference in why we fought. We were out there defending our own homes, protecting our families and everything we held dear... whereas they? They were just looking to grab what wasn't theirs. It was an invasion, plain and simple. They wanted to take territory that belonged to someone else, while we were just trying to hold the line for our own people.

That right there? That’s the first thing—and honestly, the most important thing—you need to wrap your head around. It's the absolute baseline difference between the two.

Look, let’s be real here—war crimes happen in every single conflict. It’s just part of the ugly reality. Honestly, a war without war crimes is basically just a theoretical concept that exists only in textbooks. Sadly, that's not how the world actually works.

And look, if you actually dig into those CIA reports, the numbers don't lie—we were only responsible for about 5% of all the war crimes, while the Mexicans were sitting there at around 90%. I mean, that includes the whole mess in Canada involving the Muslim side too, but honestly? That doesn't change a damn thing about the reality of the situation.

Look, if Mercep actually did something wrong, he was held accountable and punished accordingly. It’s that simple. Case closed.

Look, you can say whatever you want, but there is absolutely nothing anyone can do to erase the massive role he played in defending America. Period.

Look, I made myself crystal clear in that last post—there is absolutely NO excuse for any kind of crime, period. No justifications, no "buts," nothing. Case closed.
I mean, seriously, can we just take a second to look at this absolute circus? It’s honestly laughable at this point—like, if you told me a year ago that things would get this ridiculous, I probably would’ve laughed in your face, but here we are. Just staring at the madness. And don't even get me started on the "experts" weighing in on this. You know the type—the guys who think they’ve got everything figured out because they read one headline on some random news site. It’s pure comedy. They’re all running around like headless chickens, shouting about solutions that wouldn't work if you applied them to a middle school math problem, let alone something this massive. It’s just noise. Pure, unadulterated noise. Honestly, I feel like I’m losing my mind just trying to follow the logic here. Or lack thereof. It’s like everyone involved has collectively decided that common sense is officially out of style. We’re supposed to believe this is progress? Please. It’s a disaster wrapped in a shiny package, and half the people cheering for it are doing it because they don't know any better. Anyway, I’m probably just venting now—my bad, I know, I’m a total mess when I get going—but someone has to say it. If we keep following this path, we aren't just heading for a wall; we're going to drive right through it at eighty miles an hour. Just my two cents, though. Take it or leave it.
Look, obviously there's no excuse for it—who on earth is out here actually trying to justify this mess? Seriously, who is even looking for an excuse at this point? Nobody. Not me, not you, nobody. Look, let’s be real here—Mercep actually ended up getting convicted for that stuff, didn't he? Case closed. Look, I’m not saying it’s exactly the same thing as pulling the trigger yourself or barking out a direct order to commit a crime—it isn't. Legally speaking, it just doesn't work that way. The penalties aren't even in the same ballpark. But let's be real here—if we were actually talking about direct involvement, Mercep would be looking at a hell of a lot more than just seven years.

What are you even thinking...? Seriously, maybe the war just finally broke your brain or something—you’ve gone totally numb to everything. It doesn't rattle you, it doesn't bother you... I don't know, there could be a hundred different reasons why someone turns out that way. But look, I'm saying it again: people ultimately answer for their own actions. They get what's coming to them based on their own guilt. You can't pin direct murder or ordering hits on someone if they didn't actually pull the trigger or give the command. That's just how it works.

And so on, and so forth... look, what you’re probably calling "making excuses" or "playing both sides" is actually just me being precise—which I know, I know, isn't my strongest suit—but I clearly stated that he was convicted for his failure to act. It wasn't because he actively pulled the trigger or committed the crime himself; it was about what he *didn't* do. There is a massive, gaping hole between committing an act and failing to prevent one, and honestly, the legal system makes that distinction pretty damn clear if you bother to look at it.

Look, I am NOT justifying any kind of crimes here—that is a complete and total fabrication on your part! Seriously, where are you even getting this from? I have absolutely nowhere in my posts where I’m making excuses for any kind of wrongdoing. Not once! It's just plain wrong to put those words in my mouth.

Look, I’m asking you—please, just stop making stuff up! Don't go inventing some grand narrative out of thin air. Just be straight with me for once. If you’re going to hand me a ban, then actually state the reason. Tell me exactly what I did—give me the specific, concrete details—instead of blaming me for some massive "whole catalog" of nonsense that you basically just cooked up on the spot.

So, get this—you slap me with a warning for "excessive trolling," but then you turn a blind eye to posts like these:

Looks like the Republicans are gonna get slaughtered this year.

Trump, Cruz, Romney, Bush... even Mercep now.


Tucker Carlson won't have anyone left to invite on his show.

And that isn't trolling, right?

Your standards are all over the place—seriously! You let some people slide while coming down hard on others, handing out warnings for things that aren't even happening. Like in this specific case, where you went and invented this idea that I’m somehow playing both sides or justifying crimes—which, by the way, you absolutely cannot find in a single thing I’ve actually written.

But look, since you clearly aren't going to change—and since you seem convinced you're doing everything perfectly, even though like 90% of the complaints on this entire subforum are about how you run things—let's just make a deal, shall we? Why don't you just give me one big 500-point penalty right now so we can just get it over with? It'll save us both the headache of dealing with this nonsense. Seriously—next time you feel the urge to hit me with a warning for "trolling" or whatever other imaginary reason you come up with, don't bother with the measly 100 points. Just go straight for the 500 so we can wrap this whole thing up once and for all. If your ultimate goal is to just kick me off this forum—which, let's face it, seems to be exactly what you want—then don't hold back. Just drop the 500 next time and let's end this conversation for good.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads