CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Hobbies & Leisure › Cycling › Hybrid bikes: Hardtail vs. front suspension at the same price point—which is better for casual ridin

Hybrid bikes: Hardtail vs. front suspension at the same price point—which is better for casual ridin

Started by analogseal43 · · 👁 7 views · 72 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants analogseal43Paul Kim8lonebear52Matthew Booth74nimblescout50quietskipper17Casey AllenJames Davis11briskowl5Jesse Sanders39William Miller20Ryan Thomas4Matthew Jackson2bluepuma9Richard Gomez3Sophia Ramos19Andrew Miller102hollowwalker24Kenneth Walker5mellowtiger83Sam Ramos85Gregory Rodriguez9
Sophia Ramos19 Sophia Ramos19 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jun 2013
#61 ·
I’m a little nervous—it’s Friday, the kids are out on the town, there’s going to be plenty of drinking... I really ought to get some sleep. I head out tomorrow, and I’m just hoping the neighbors don't wake me up again at three or four in the morning.
Paul Kim8 Paul Kim8 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jan 2010
#62 ·
William Miller20 said:As for my joints, my musician's hands weren't even satisfied with just a shock-absorbing fork; I had to bring extra padding on my hiking trips too... 🙂

image

Like a sponge, right?
Ryan Thomas4 Ryan Thomas4 Member
14 messages
joined Sep 2011
#63 ·
I figured as much. I suppose I'll just settle for the internet generation.
Oy vey.
Casey Allen Casey Allen Newcomer
6 messages
joined May 2020
#64 ·
Ryan Thomas4 said:I knew it. I want the internet generation.
Oy vey.

Nah, you missed the mark completely. The "internet generation" already hit their stride way back in the early 2000s. Back then, we were already transitioning into mainstream ISDN or maybe even seeing the first bits of DSL—I can't recall the exact timeline, but I just know I spent years grinding away at StarCraft and Quake on a 56k modem while we all used to mess around and joke about wanting the internet. 😁
Andrew Miller102 Andrew Miller102 Active Member
81 messages
joined Jul 2024
#65 ·
William Miller20 said:@Casey Allen/">@@Casey Allen
They’ve mostly left me alone since my bikes were stolen, which I assume is just out of pity. 😁
There was already some friction before this, and if you decide to stick around this forum, you’re going to run into more of it. From here on out, people are going to be scrutinizing every single word you type, just waiting for an opening to jump on you or turn you into a laughingstock.

When it comes to my wrists, even a suspension fork wasn't enough to save them; I had to run extra soft setups on my trekking bikes just to take the edge off... 🙂

Listen, I've got something to say.😁 When you're young, you really don't need all that extra suspension and complex setups to get by. It’s only once the years start catching up with you that things change, and then you'll find yourself dealing with various physical issues depending on how your body decides to hold up.

When you look at most commuting setups, having a front suspension is honestly just overkill—it’s basically nothing more than extra weight you don't need. That said, there's no harm in it if someone really wants one on their Cross or Trekking bike, but it's purely a matter of preference.

The issue we have here in the States is that most people just ride their various mountain bikes around town or on paved streets. For them, anything even remotely "off-road" is just some light gravel or maybe a patch of packed dirt. You could honestly tackle that kind of terrain with a rigid fork and never worry about jarring your arms or wrecking your kidneys.

It’s the same old story at the end of the day: some aging crew riding rigid mountain bikes like they’re still invincible. I can tell the group is still kicking around, but honestly, without any suspension to soak up the impact, everything just falls apart from the constant vibration and all that reckless jumping.🙂

Watch out, because there’s a certain crowd out there acting completely reckless, intentionally slamming on nothing but their front brakes just to see how long they can balance on that front wheel.🙂

I’ve been spending some time looking over this footage, and honestly, if you want to understand where the industry is heading with high-end builds, you really need to watch this Marin. It isn't just about the specs on paper, though those are impressive enough; it’s about how the geometry actually translates to the trail when you're pushing hard. There is a certain level of refinement here that most brands are still struggling to grasp, and seeing it laid out like this makes a pretty undeniable case for why this specific setup works the way it does.
analogseal43 analogseal43 NewcomerOP
2 messages
joined May 2013
#66 ·
So, here's my final take... I think I'm just gonna go with a hardtail. Or maybe a front suspension setup, but only if the fork actually locks out properly. Honestly, if I aim for something in that $1,100 range, I should be able to snag a ride that’s actually decent quality and way lighter than those cheap junkers you see everywhere. Once I pull the trigger and get it, I'll post a pic. 👍
hollowwalker24 hollowwalker24 Member
26 messages
joined Mar 2020
#67 ·
Matthew Booth74 said:That’s why I stick to rim brakes—you can't even grab them hard enough to fly over the handlebars. 😁
Discs pretty much slow you down anyway once you hit the brakes—I guess.

Matthew Jackson2 said:Some genius dropped a take on brakes that basically became an instant legend around here—it’s pretty much our internal shorthand now.

Did you guys miss this? 🤣

ummm... said:Any disc brake works—more or less—just as well when it's dry or wet, unless... The brakes are slipping, I guess. It’s easy to just forget everything and wander right in front of a car at a red light—along with an old Kon and some V-brakes.

I guess maybe we should just watch this Marin—it might actually be worth something if you find the right buyer.
nimblescout50 nimblescout50 Active Member
88 messages
joined May 2012
#68 ·
Ryan Thomas4 said:You're both right that suspension absorbs some of that force—not the braking force itself, mind you, but the inertia.
But you're forgetting one thing: when the fork compresses, it actually shortens the lever arm between the pivot point—basically the wheel center—and the rider's center of mass (say, the backside). This means you need less torque to pull off a total somersault.
So, a good chunk of that absorbed energy just gets canceled out by the physics of the movement...
Now, all of this works perfectly in theory—you know, in a lab setting where you have the exact same bike, the same rider, and the same brakes under identical conditions.
In the real world, any actual difference in how someone brakes or flips is going to come down to the rider themselves.
In other words, if you've got zero skill, you aren't going to fly over the bars just because of your gear; it doesn't matter if it's
rigid or suspension.

I think you tripped up here.
What you're actually trying to say is that the torque required to flip increases, rather than decreases.
Since the lever arm got shorter.
Which would mean it's harder to flip.
Kenneth Walker5 Kenneth Walker5 Newcomer
1 message
joined May 2020
#69 ·
Riding on city streets with a suspension fork that won't lock out is a recipe for disaster; you’re hitting a fast, sweeping corner, the fork suddenly dives, and suddenly your rear end is washing out from under you.

I know this because I’ve lived through the painful reality of eating pavement thanks to that exact mistake, which is why I stick strictly to a rigid fork whenever I'm navigating urban asphalt—take my word for it, guys.😒
mellowtiger83 mellowtiger83 Regular
466 messages
joined Aug 2014
#70 ·
Kenneth Walker5 said:A suspension fork you can't lock out is a total disaster on city pavement. You hit a fast corner, the fork dives, and suddenly the rear end just washes out on you.

I know this from personal, rather unpleasant experience. I took a tumble because of it. Now, I stick strictly to rigid forks for city riding and asphalt. Take my word for it, guys. 😒

I once tried to play it cool with XC MTB geometry, mimicking someone like Nina Shuter, only to realize I’m far too incompetent for the woods on a setup like that. It becomes pure survival.

It's true. That was the reason I could fly up climbs effortlessly. 🙂

The point is that everything has its trade-offs. In my case, it was glaringly obvious: I simply lack the skill to ride downhill with such a shallow head angle like those XC racers do without breaking a bone.
Richard Gomez3 Richard Gomez3 Newcomer
2 messages
joined May 2020
#71 ·
Kenneth Walker5 said:Riding a suspension fork you can't lock out is a total disaster on city pavement. You hit a sharp corner, the fork dives, and suddenly your rear end is sliding out from under you.

I know because I’ve lived it—firsthand, and it wasn't pretty. That's why I stick to a rigid fork for any city riding or asphalt. Take my advice, guys. 😒

You shouldn't be braking mid-turn anyway. If you have to grab the brakes, you misjudged the corner and now you're just fighting to survive. It's a mess because braking forces you to straighten the bike up when you actually need to lean. Brake before the turn.
It’s got nothing to do with the fork.
Sam Ramos85 Sam Ramos85 Active Member
55 messages
joined Oct 2012
#72 ·
Just gonna jump in here for a second🙂
I’ve been looking at this Marin with a CroMo frame and fork, and honestly, I’m not smart enough to figure out what the actual pros and cons are for a build like that compared to an aluminum one🤔
Gregory Rodriguez9 Gregory Rodriguez9 Newcomer
1 message
joined May 2020
#73 ·
Here's my response from that other thread—same exact question, just for a different bike..

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads