CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Unbelievable sexism the day after International Women's Day—and for no reason at all?!

Unbelievable sexism the day after International Women's Day—and for no reason at all?!

Started by crimsonhawk23 · · 👁 5 views · 11 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants crimsonhawk23crimsonhawk20rapidhound2Jerry Robinson56Kenneth Cruz67Benjamin Taylor90Christian Howard2
crimsonhawk23 crimsonhawk23 MemberOP
22 messages
joined Nov 2018
#1 ·
Lol, Jerry Robinson56, that’s hardly surprising. It is a bit surprising, though, that you haven't put him on ignore—which I assume everyone else has done after reading more than one of his posts 🤷
crimsonhawk20 crimsonhawk20 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Aug 2021
#2 ·
rapidhound2 said:When someone runs out of actual arguments, they just resort to disgusting sexism—is that really the best we can do?
I honestly don't know—maybe we just need more clarity on the whole situation? It feels like everyone is talking at once, but nobody is actually saying anything meaningful—does that make sense to anyone else?

In case anyone tries to edit their post before we get to it, let's just quote the part that's causing all the trouble:

Most of us have been hanging around here for years—while you’re still pretty much the new kid on the block... does that really mean we've read through so much nonsense already that you aren't even interesting anymore?
I'm talking about the head— Legs are just a whole different story—really..


I'd say this... It’s just such gross, primitive behavior—and honestly, it's pretty hard to stomach when people are being that offensive. They deserve way more than just a red card—I mean, did we really see that? There were some really lovely examples of men giving roses to women here yesterday—just little gestures that meant a lot, you know?

Well, here we go—we've even got examples like this one. Absolute madness.

If that "1980" in your handle means you’re around that age—and let's assume you aren't just trying to pay tribute to J. B. Tito or pull some other "intellectual" stunt—then this whole reaction is just... well, it's a bit much. For someone with forty years of life under their belt, acting this outraged is honestly kind of embarrassing? You're reacting to Jerry Robinson56 like he actually insulted your entire extended family or threatened them with violence and worse. If that were actually the case, we'd be calling it "vile primitivism," right? But let's be real—no one here is ever going to experience anything like that from him.

He mentioned:
Most of us have been hanging around here for years—whereas you just arrived... which basically means we've already read enough nonsense to last a lifetime, right? You're almost not even interesting—honestly?.
I mean the head—just thinking about the head.But legs—those are a whole different story.


So, looks like you "accidentally" left out the sentence that came right before this—wasn't that just a coincidence?Honestly, the level of your question is just kind of ridiculous—is this really what we're doing? Someone already put it perfectly—your eyes just adjust to the brightest light around, so you won't be able to see anything once it drops below a certain level. It’s just how it works, right?
blinded by the science—I’m guessing you already know why The is here?

Could you be a sweetheart and drop the link? I’m standing by my claim—mostly because I actually know a thing or two about how electromagnetic waves propagate, how they're generated, and how that transmission is received. So, let's keep going—feel free to double-check whatever you want. I really do appreciate the effort you're putting in, but honestly? You're heading down the wrong path...
"
Was that also a case of sexism—just wondering? 🤷

Unless you’ve spent basically your entire life in total isolation—away from any kind of male company, whether that's friends, coworkers, or even just social circles (which, honestly, your reaction makes me wonder)—what he actually meant was: We see these types of people all the time—someone pops in with maybe thirty posts, drops one or two "expert" opinions, and suddenly acts like they own the place—as if this whole thread and everything on this forum started the second they typed their first word? And when people don't agree, they immediately pivot to personal attacks. Honestly, just read the thread before jumping in. What you're saying is just a recycled version of the same unverified, incorrect nonsense we've seen a thousand times already—I really don't have the energy to keep arguing this with you. Long story short: it's nonsense, and I'm done responding. If you want to keep going for whatever reason, feel free to reach out somewhere else.

I don't see anything controversial about this at all. Honestly—if you jump into a conversation and try to flirt using your own unique style—maybe people will just think you're looking for a connection? It’s that classic situation where a guy should respect a "no"—but what happens if a woman keeps pushing after being told "no"? What then? I thought Jerry Robinson56 gave a really solid answer. He left the door open if you have actual ideas to move things forward, while still being clear about how he feels about your posts. To me, your exchange is heading exactly in that direction. Besides, I haven't even jumped into the debate myself—I'm just watching from the sidelines.

Honestly, the sexism you’re talking about seems to exist mostly in your own head—just your own perception and interpretation. Any normal guy's reaction to being falsely accused of sexism by you—when you're making claims based on your own frustrations or past bad experiences rather than anything real—would just be to ignore you. Or maybe, if you keep posting stuff like this, you'll eventually just end up self-banning through sheer annoyance.

Besides, why on earth would ti tell someone they're ignorant? Like, in that specific post, claiming he doesn't know English? Is that really okay to do, especially when you don't even know him or have ever actually talked to him before? Did you just decide that based on one single post? Or are you using a burner account and you guys already know each other? Hmmm. Or maybe it's just flirting through provocation?

Or maybe the truth is simpler—you just wanted to look smart, witty, or cool to grab some attention. And then, when people didn't react the way you expected, you felt "offended" (as if they were being mean to *you*) and came here to complain and demand bans and warnings. And all of this while bringing up International Women's Day and sexism.

Nothing personal, but you're really just spinning your wheels here...

☕
rapidhound2 rapidhound2 Member
10 messages
joined Mar 2020
#3 ·
crimsonhawk20 said:Assuming that the "1980" in your handle is roughly when you were born—rather than some weird attempt at paying homage to J. B. Tito or some other "intellectual" nonsense—then you’re clearly old enough to know better. For a 40-year-old with actual life experience, this reaction is just... pathetic. You're acting all outraged, as if Jerry Robinson56 basically insulted your entire lineage and threatened your whole family with some kind of medieval violence. If that was actually the case, *that* would be "vile primitivism and a serious insult." But let's be real, nobody here is even close to that level of offense.

Mentioned:
A lot of us have been hanging out here for years while you're just the new kid on the block... which means we've read enough garbage to decide that you're hardly interesting.
I'm talking about your brain, though legs are a different story


Unless you've spent your entire life in total isolation, completely cut off from any kind of male company—social, professional, romantic, whatever—your reaction makes it seem like you have. Translated into plain English, what he said was basically: We've seen plenty of people like you swoop in with one or two posts, try to act like an expert as if the world revolves around your first comment, and derail everything. Do yourself a favor: actually read the thread before you start talking. Plus, what you're saying is just the thousandth iteration of the same tired, unverified, incorrect nonsense, and I'm honestly done wasting my breath on it. Long story short: you're being dense, and I'm done responding. If you want to keep chasing me, feel free to take it somewhere else.

And honestly, there’s nothing wrong with that. Look, if you're trying to flirt with someone in your own weird, specific way, it might come off as wanting to hang out. It’s that classic "NO" scenario—when a woman says "no," a guy should respect it. But when a woman keeps pushing after being told "no," what then? That's exactly how your messages are reading to me. And for the record, I haven't even jumped into the debate; I'm just watching from the sidelines.

That "sexism" you're crying about seems to exist entirely in your head. Any normal guy's reaction to YOUR sexist outburst—accusing someone of being sexist without any actual basis, based purely on your own biases, frustrations, or past bad experiences—would simply be to ignore you or treat you like you don't exist.

Besides, why are you calling someone ignorant (like claiming they don't know English in that specific post)? Is that really okay, especially since you don't even know them or have ever actually talked to them? You just decided that based on a single post? Hmm. Or is this just thirsty provocation? And then, once you get called out, you'll just claim sexism to save face?

Or maybe the truth is simpler: you wanted to look smart, but when someone talked back, you felt "offended" because things didn't go your way, so you came here to whine and demand bans and warnings. And imagine that—invoking International Women's Day and claims of sexism to do it.

By the way, "International Women's Day" as a concept in modern society is a total oxymoron.
Because if women are truly equal to men in society, then insisting on a "Women's Day" is redundant. Mentioning sexism becomes unnecessary. Men and women would just be equals, and there wouldn't be a need for special days for any specific gender. If they aren't equal, well, then we're getting into some deep philosophical territory. In that case, you'd have a Women's Day and a Men's Day, and lately, the LGBTQXY community can fight for their own days too, individually or all together.
☕

Honestly, you’d have to be operating on a level of raw, primitive stupidity even lower than Jerry Robinson56 to cram this much nonsense into one single post. When someone coming from such a caveman-tier mindset dares to even utter the word "civilization," it’s like watching Hitler try to give a sermon on global peace, brotherhood, and equality—regardless of gender, race, or creed. Just because I’m just now jumping into this thread doesn't mean I know any less about the topic than the people who've been lurking here for years. That’s basic logic 101. Massive amounts of savagery and primitivism usually pair perfectly with being logically bankrupt. You’ve got 33 posts under your belt, which is actually more than me—so what, is that supposed to be some kind of metric for your expertise? Of course not, but clearly, in your head, it is. It’s pretty ironic that you’re acting this condescendingly when you barely have any skin in the game. At the end of the day, it doesn't even matter who has the better arguments regarding whatever mess happened with Jerry Robinson56; the point is that his sexist, barbaric outburst isn't just obvious to everyone—it's only going to be recognized by even bigger sexist savages and total primitives than he is.

Anyway, thanks for the pile of sexist, primitive trash you just dumped here—outbursts like this make for great material for sociological and psychological studies. I saw people getting handed red cards here recently for way, way less than the heap of garbage you just piled up, so I’m genuinely curious to see how this plays out. I really hope the outcome doesn't depend entirely on whoever decides to judge this—specifically, someone whose gender determines how deep into the dumpster they categorize your little quasi-intellectual, ego-driven meltdown.

Aunt Sarnavka, are you seeing this? If not, maybe someone should give you a heads-up? The Istanbul Convention is ratified, isn't it?
Jerry Robinson56 Jerry Robinson56 Regular
320 messages
joined Apr 2013
#4 ·
crimsonhawk23 said:Honestly, Jerry Robinson56, this isn't even surprising. What does surprise me is that you haven't put him on ignore yet, which seems like the only logical step for anyone who has endured more than a single one of his posts. 🤷

I highly doubt it; those with actual intelligence never seem to have an issue with my commentary.
Jerry Robinson56 Jerry Robinson56 Regular
320 messages
joined Apr 2013
#5 ·
rapidhound2 said:When a user runs out of actual arguments, they inevitably resort to nauseating sexism:

In the unlikely event that the user attempts to edit their post before this is archived, let us quote the offending passage:

A lot of us have been on this board for years while you're just arriving... which means we've read so much nonsense that you're practically uninteresting.
I am referring to intellect; legs are a different matter entirely..


I would argue that this kind of vile primitivism and blatant insult warrants far more than a simple red card. We saw some lovely examples of men offering digital roses to women here just yesterday.

But instead, we are presented with such staggering displays of savagery.

Of course they are different things; everyone knows which one comes first, but you're getting ahead of yourself—I can see you're in a hurry to leave. You likely know my preferences regarding men, so you only pass muster if you possess a certain masculine edge. 😁

P.S. I don't edit my own posts; that's a privilege reserved for the moderators.
crimsonhawk20 crimsonhawk20 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Aug 2021
#6 ·
rapidhound2 said:How much nonsense can you actually fit into one short post? Honestly, it takes someone operating at a much more primitive level than Jerry Robinson56 to pull that off...


This much—? Just a bunch of nonsense—honestly, why even bother? You can only write something that short if you're actually there—I mean, isn't that just how it works? It’s just... even more primitive than that—back to some sort of wild, basic level? From Jerry Robinson56. When you deal with someone like that— Just some wild, primitive positions—if you know what I mean. He thinks he can just throw around a word like "civilization"—as if he actually knows what that means? It’s honestly kind of wild... Hitler giving a sermon—can you even imagine? Talk about love, brotherhood, and equality for everyone on the planet—regardless of gender, race, nationality, or religion. Just because I’m just now jumping into this thread doesn't mean I don't get it—or that I know any less than the folks who have been hanging out here for years. It's just basic logic, really. This level of savagery and pure primitivism—honestly, how is this even possible? You're acing Elementary Logic—nice work. You've got 33 posts under your belt now, which is actually a bit more than me. Does that somehow serve as a definitive proof of what you know or don't know? Of course not—but since you clearly seem to think it does, it’s pretty ironic that you’re acting this condescending given you've only written 33 posts. At the end of the day, it doesn't even matter who has the stronger arguments regarding the incident involving Jerry Robinson56; what really matters is... Jerry Robinson56's sexist outburst was just wild—honestly, where does that even come from? It’s not exactly obvious—is it? I’m still absolutely fuming at those sexist savages—honestly, they make him look like a saint by comparison.

Anyway—thanks for putting that all down in writing. Just a pile of sexist, barbaric, primitive trash.I mean, yeah—right? These kinds of toxic outbursts—they’re honestly perfect fodder for some deep sociological and psychological analysis, aren't they?I've noticed a few instances here lately where people are handing out red cards way too easily—for much, much less than what actually warrants it... don't you think? All that stuff you laid out above—I honestly wonder what’s going to happen this time—really. I just can't wrap my head around the idea that the outcome depends entirely on who ends up judging the case... you know, like having some stranger decide which category your trash belongs in? Just some pseudo-intellectual poser—honestly, what a joke..

Sarnavka, are you seeing this? If not—maybe someone should probably give you a heads-up? I mean, hasn't that Istanbul Convention been ratified yet?

Just wanted to make sure this "original" doesn't get lost—quoted it so everyone can see.

Hitler? Please. This is just a mountain of nonsense—honestly, it’s even more primitive than some of the savages hanging out on this forum. We're looking at a level of sheer savagery and lack of civility that's hard to wrap my head around. It’s just a pile of sexist, primitive garbage... though, I suppose these kinds of outbursts make for interesting material if you're into sociological or psychological studies. Honestly, there are people out there who are even more sexist and primal than Hitler himself. Just how much trash does your overexcited, quasi-intellectual sycophant need to dump before we call it what it is?

It’s a shame—you went from a lighthearted joke to this total meltdown, and honestly? It just shows where you stand. It’s pretty wild how much anger and frustration you can dump onto a minor disagreement after just one post pointing out you were wrong. You can try blaming Jerry Robinson56, me, or whoever else—but you’re the one who dug this hole. Now that everything's out in the open, I guess you can just sit there and enjoy all that "beauty" and "genius" you claim to have.
Nobody here has actually insulted you—not even once. Honestly, just look at what you wrote. It’s pretty embarrassing for a 40-year-old woman who should be acting mature and composed, but instead, this reads like a frustrated outburst from someone totally out of touch—full of nothing but venting (especially about sexual stuff, if we're being honest) and sounding like someone on the verge of a breakdown, playing the quasi-feminist card, and just feeling unloved. I won't give you a formal psychological assessment—even though that's my actual profession—but as a friend? You really ought to seek some help before you end up sitting across from me or one of my colleagues in an official capacity.
Best, ☕
rapidhound2 rapidhound2 Member
10 messages
joined Mar 2020
#7 ·
crimsonhawk20 said:I’m not trying to give you a psychological breakdown—even though I could since that's my actual job—but as a friend, my advice is to go find some help before you end up officially sitting across from me or one of my colleagues.
Best, ☕.

You’re doing a pretty terrible job playing the part of Mr. Herman Vukušić, someone I actually have a ton of respect for. But look, if you're going to try and pass off your huge range of disorders and pure, unadulterated primitivism as the "expert insight" of a mental health professional—which, by the way, is a disgusting way to insult the profession and experts like Mr. Vukušić—then maybe you should just reach out to him directly and ask for help. Honestly. I don't doubt he'd help you if you actually opened up. And I'm being dead serious here, not ironic. People like you really do need help. Maybe not even just for your own sake, but because of how much the people around you suffer when they have to deal with this kind of aggressive, primitive nonsense contaminating everything.
Jerry Robinson56 Jerry Robinson56 Regular
320 messages
joined Apr 2013
#8 ·
Review:

rapidhound2 said:Your portrayal of Mr. Herman Vukušić is quite poor, and I hold him in very high regard. However, when you attempt to present your vast spectrum of neuroses and blatant primitivism as if they were the byproduct of some supposed psychiatric expertise—thereby insulting both the profession and experts like the esteemed Mr. Vukušić in a truly revolting manner—you might want to consider reaching out to Mr. Vukušić directly to request assistance. I have no doubt he would provide it, provided you approach him with genuine sincerity. This isn't irony; it is an expression of absolute honesty. People of your disposition are in dire need of help. Perhaps not just for your own sake, but because of the way such aggressive patterns, primitivism, and savagery can contaminate those around you.

I’ve known Herman since we were kids playing with Matchbox cars, so don't try to troll me. I also know another guy from our old neighborhood in Chicago who caused a massive stir in the field of psychiatry.
We grew up in the same area.

And if anyone here actually has a problem, unfortunately, it's you...

Can I make amends? I'll send the best Uber in NYC to pick you up.
crimsonhawk20 crimsonhawk20 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Aug 2021
#9 ·
rapidhound2 said:You’re doing a terrible job impersonating Mr. Herman Vukušić—someone I actually have a lot of respect for. But look, if you’re going to try and frame your wide range of issues and total lack of class as some kind of "expert" psychological insight—which, honestly, is just an insult to the profession and people like Mr. Vukušić—then maybe you should just reach out to him directly and ask for help. I’m being dead serious here, not sarcastic. People like you really do need support. Not even just for yourselves, but because the aggression and raw hostility you're putting out can be pretty toxic for everyone else around you.

The way you write makes it pretty obvious you’re probably a regular at Mr. Vukušić's office—so, for your own sake, my advice is to show him this thread. Anger management, venting frustrations, dealing with internal conflicts... he could actually help you with all of that. Seriously. It would make things easier.
Maybe you'll eventually realize that all the nastiness, the rudeness, and the rage in this thread are just coming from your own head—from your own writing and your own frustrations. No one else here has said a single mean thing. Just take a break, breathe, and come back when you're feeling more like yourself. It’ll be easier to write once you remember this is a forum meant for everyone, not just a place for you and your anger. 🙂😘
Kenneth Cruz67 Kenneth Cruz67 Regular
376 messages
joined Oct 2017
#10 ·
It honestly looks like these two are bickering as if they’ve each racked up 50,000 posts together, when in reality, they’ve barely even hit fifty. I suspect they might just be clones of someone who already got permabanned, or maybe—just maybe—it’s actually one person arguing with themselves using two different accounts. Either way, we certainly shouldn't let that old fossil get any more satisfaction out of this.
Benjamin Taylor90 Benjamin Taylor90 Member
45 messages
joined Mar 2018
#11 ·
That moment when the guy starting a thread about being wild... actually goes off the rails. 🙏 🙏 😂 😂
Christian Howard2 Christian Howard2 Member
19 messages
joined Nov 2011
#12 ·
Look, we’ve been over this more than a few times now: please don't rush to start a new thread the second you spot a controversial post.
The protocol is simple. First, file a report. You can only open a discussion here after 24 hours have passed since that initial report was made—and keep in mind, not every single report actually warrants a full-blown debate.

Also, just a heads-up: any kind of insults or blatant rudeness in your complaints is something we simply won't tolerate.

And that’s why we have the key.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads