Political mods, do better.

Moderators are supposed to be neutral, but let’s be real—that’s just not happening here. Most of them have clear political leanings, and they aren't afraid to show it. If you dare to post an opinion that runs counter to their agenda, you get "rewarded" with a red card.
I usually don't bother commenting on how things are moderated because, honestly, what's the point? My values and political views are polar opposites to the vibe of this forum.
Not long ago, moderator Roko stepped down because the admin felt he was being too subjective.
Now, we've got moderators like the FBI, a clone, and especially unknown spitting on unknown, Bernie Sanders, and openly rooting for AT&T.
What kind of moderation is that??
Shutting down different perspectives has basically become the standard for political discussion here. Users get just enough points to stay active before hitting a minimum three-day ban. It’s nothing short of censorship.

granitefalcon26, you've been part of this community for years now, so you understand the inner workings of this forum. Moderators, much like anyone else in the world, carry their own personal biases; however, their duty is to moderate based on the established rules, not their individual opinions. We are all human, and it is certainly possible for personal views to occasionally cloud judgment—which is precisely why the appeal process exists. But if you truly intend to lodge a complaint regarding a moderator's conduct, I suggest you find specific instances where inconsistent criteria were applied and provide those links here.