Interesting stuff

Joseph Stewart38 said:I never actually claimed it was impossible, nor did I say that Rankin's statement was factual. My issue—my actual problem here—is this absolute certainty people have that something doesn't exist just because it isn't sitting on some magazine cover.

As for Sedlar, I don't know enough about that situation to weigh in—and frankly, I'm not interested in getting distracted from the main point.

Oh, but that is *exactly* the point: when someone cites a cover that’s been fabricated or—even worse—Photoshopped... look, if the Wikipedia editors had actually bothered to Photoshop that Time Magazine cover from 1951, we'd have something to talk about. But good luck finding the exact fonts used by printing presses back in '51! They didn't put in any effort at all—they just assumed nobody would ever bother checking old archives... unbelievable.👍

At least Sedlar actually tried with his Photoshop job (he even added those crumpled, punched-hole paper effects)...🤣

So, the cover we have doesn't show it. But who knows? It might be tucked away on those pages we can't access yet... 😵
Hey, hi there!

To reminds me of something a character from Spider-Man once said: "Now I'm going to recite a poem I wrote before I even learned how to write!"...🙂