#1 ·
The moderators deleted posts from users who were hurling heavy insults at forum members and their families without even issuing a warning or a strike, yet they deleted my posts while giving me a warning.
If my posts warranted a warning, then the posts from everyone else deserved a full ban.
If we’re going to follow the rules strictly, fine—give me a strike for a post that might be considered borderline offensive. But then the moderators should hand out bans for posts and private messages that aren't just "offensive," but are blatant, direct attacks on both registered members and outsiders.
Otherwise, they should just come out and state it publicly—and update the forum rules—that the old guard is allowed to say whatever they want, including insulting newcomers and their families, while the newcomers are the ones getting censored.
If my posts warranted a warning, then the posts from everyone else deserved a full ban.
If we’re going to follow the rules strictly, fine—give me a strike for a post that might be considered borderline offensive. But then the moderators should hand out bans for posts and private messages that aren't just "offensive," but are blatant, direct attacks on both registered members and outsiders.
Otherwise, they should just come out and state it publicly—and update the forum rules—that the old guard is allowed to say whatever they want, including insulting newcomers and their families, while the newcomers are the ones getting censored.