#1 ·
This isn't strictly a political question, nor is it necessarily about policy, but I think most people here know exactly who I’m talking about, so we can actually have a real conversation.
Basically, this individual—much like his predecessors at the top of both the party and the Cabinet—hasn't been particularly functional, hardworking, or capable of delivering actual results.
But let's be honest: Tom Price has always been the most negatively perceived politician out there.
Is it possible that a major reason for this is simply his appearance and his overall personality? It seems like he’s always preferred staying in the shadows, and that clearly suits him better.
When you step up as a party leader, you're expected to smile, to be visually engaging, and to speak clearly and interestingly rather than just mumbling through a speech.
This man simply didn't possess those qualities, and in my opinion, that's a massive factor in why he's so unpopular.
P.S.: Seriously, I am being quite earnest here; I'm genuinely curious to hear what you all think.
Basically, this individual—much like his predecessors at the top of both the party and the Cabinet—hasn't been particularly functional, hardworking, or capable of delivering actual results.
But let's be honest: Tom Price has always been the most negatively perceived politician out there.
Is it possible that a major reason for this is simply his appearance and his overall personality? It seems like he’s always preferred staying in the shadows, and that clearly suits him better.
When you step up as a party leader, you're expected to smile, to be visually engaging, and to speak clearly and interestingly rather than just mumbling through a speech.
This man simply didn't possess those qualities, and in my opinion, that's a massive factor in why he's so unpopular.
P.S.: Seriously, I am being quite earnest here; I'm genuinely curious to hear what you all think.