rustydrifter10 said:A partial ban is permanent; it stays forever, with no expiration date unless the moderators decide otherwise.
Don't you think this punishment is a bit excessive? Granted, I know I’ve been difficult at times in the past—I mean, none of us are perfect, right?—but to receive a partial ban simply because I disagree with someone's viewpoint, or perhaps because I believe American football could and should perform better, is, if you'll excuse my bluntness, somewhat undemocratic. What is the point of coming to this forum to comment on anything at all if I am not permitted to think or speak differently?
My colleague Anthony Jackson2 mentioned "fooling around" and a string of trolling escapades as the reason. But honestly, what exactly does he consider trolling? It seems like every sensible opinion I've shared has earned me a metaphorical yellow card. Every single one. Sure, when the thread about NK Split came up, I was responding to posts from jealous Los Angeles Dodgers fans, but again, I never insulted anyone or made any threats. In fact, they were usually the ones starting the insults. If you don't believe me, just ask the Seattle fans what they think of them. Ever since Seattle went through privatization, those guys have attacked them with everything they've got because things have actually started looking up for Seattle. They strike at their local rivals the same way. That is precisely why they targeted me.
I am well aware that I am not exactly the most popular person on that PDF game, but tell me, how exactly was I supposed to behave there? It isn't that I have anything against the Los Angeles Dodgers or their supporters; quite the opposite, I respect them and truly want to see that club move forward, after all, they are our very own American Lazio. However, supporting an administration that drove the club to the brink of bankruptcy, or the sympathizers who keep them in power, is something I simply cannot do. That is why I advocated for the privatization of the club, but the Dodgers fans refuse to even hear it. To them, anything private is seen as criminal or ruinous, while state ownership is treated as sacred. They have made their stance perfectly clear themselves.
But really, is that enough to justify a permanent ban? Is it because I happen to think with a capitalist mindset? 🤷