CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Mad Max: Fury Road (2014)

Mad Max: Fury Road (2014)

Started by Paul Patel95 · · 👁 4 views · 17 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Paul Patel95Mark White11Sophia Thomas7Jamie Turner80Nicholas WatsonLawrence Booth2Jeffrey Ramos4Nicole JonesJustin Rogers5lonehound2Matthew Anderson4bluenomad2rustyraven4Nancy Howard4
Paul Patel95 Paul Patel95 MemberOP
31 messages
joined Feb 2018
#1 ·
image

IMDb 6.3/10
RT 80%

Zombies! Honestly, I dug it. There’s something about that Aussie slang that just hits different—all those "bloody hell" and "mate" vibes.

Solid zombie flick, 7/10. They really went all out on the creative weaponry, the scrap armor, the custom rigs, and the kills...

If you're into zombies, this is a total must-see.

TRAILER
Mark White11 Mark White11 Active Member
92 messages
joined Jan 2018
#2 ·
For such a tiny budget, this thing looks absolutely killer—the colors and the cinematography are just spot on. I do wish it was a little more crazy, though; it stays a bit too serious even with those funny comedic touches sprinkled in. It can't quite dodge a few clichés here and there, but honestly, there are enough fresh ideas that you'll end up binge-watching it in one go.
The acting is top-tier too, and the lead actor actually reminds me a bit of Eric Bana.

Huge recommendation from me! I really think it deserves way more than a 7/10.
Sophia Thomas7 Sophia Thomas7 Active Member
183 messages
joined Aug 2015
#3 ·
Grace Sanchez50 said:For such a tiny budget, this looks incredible—the colors and cinematography are top-notch. That said, I wish it were just a hair more goofy; it feels a bit too serious at times, even with those funny comedic undertones. It hits a few clichés, sure, but there are enough fresh ideas here to make it a solid binge-watch.
The acting is great, too. The lead actor actually reminds me a bit of Eric Bana.

Highly recommended! Personally, I think it deserves better than a 7.

More goofy about how they get their fuel? From what I've read, they're already prepping a sequel, which I am all for. 😁
Mark White11 Mark White11 Active Member
92 messages
joined Jan 2018
#4 ·
Matthew Anderson said:Crazier than the way they're getting their fuel? From what I’ve been reading, they’re working on a sequel, so I am totally down for that. 😁

Also, the whole thing felt a bit too serious for me—like, it had this heavy foundation that I just couldn't really vibe with. Maybe I didn't word it right, but the tone was just way too intense. I really miss that goofy, ridiculous energy you get in something like Feast.

I'm all for a sequel too, especially since his sister got that power to control the zombies now—that makes her seriously cool.
Paul Patel95 Paul Patel95 MemberOP
31 messages
joined Feb 2018
#5 ·
Grace Sanchez50 said:I don't know, it felt way too serious to me, like it was playing it straight when I just wanted to blow off some steam. Maybe I didn't phrase it right, but the whole tone is just so heavy—it needs more of that ridiculousness or parody vibes, kind of like in >.

Hell yeah, I'm down for a sequel, especially now that his sister can control the zombies and everything is just awesome.

Personally, I think it’s pretty well balanced—not too much mushy crap and not too much comedy either.

Guns, cars running over zombies, that one native guy, the soldiers, someone getting their nose ripped off... I dunno, what else do you even need?

Sequel? 👍

"OI! Can we get inside? There's fucken' zombies everywhere!"

"yea kay..."

"Ohh, beers! You wanna beer >?"

"What do you fucken' reckon!?"

🤣
Jamie Turner80 Jamie Turner80 Member
37 messages
joined Jul 2009
#6 ·
It is a rather interesting bit of trivia that Dawn of the Dead was essentially an amateur undertaking, filmed purely on sheer enthusiasm during weekends over the course of four years. Despite this, the film doesn't come across as amateurish; it might lean slightly toward a fan-driven aesthetic, but it certainly avoids being dilettantish. While the cast consists of unknowns, that does not preclude them from being professionals, and they were quite excellently cast and utilized. The Roache-Turner brothers clearly possessed a very firm grasp of their creative objectives, and they succeeded in meeting them. Ultimately, Dawn of the Dead is a perfectly decent film that manages to feel fresh and genuinely entertaining, even when working with a tired premise and rigid genre tropes.

more at:
http://film-na-dan.blogspot.com/2015...d-of-dead.html
Nicholas Watson Nicholas Watson Active Member
106 messages
joined Feb 2014
#7 ·
Look, I’ve never been much of a fan of that whole zombie subgenre, but honestly? This flick caught me way off guard in the best way possible. I actually had a blast watching it. It’s hands down better than half those big-budget blockbusters out there right now.
fuel 🤣
Lawrence Booth2 Lawrence Booth2 Regular
297 messages
joined Sep 2022
#8 ·
Man, I seriously lost it when he was looking for an ambulance box
I don't think anything has ever made me laugh harder than this
Jeffrey Ramos4 Jeffrey Ramos4 Active Member
188 messages
joined Nov 2008
#9 ·
I actually really enjoyed this movie. It was a pleasant surprise, and the visuals were pretty impressive too... 👍
Nicole Jones Nicole Jones Member
12 messages
joined Nov 2017
#10 ·
Man, what a great movie... screw Hollywood!
Justin Rogers5 Justin Rogers5 Active Member
214 messages
joined Feb 2010
#11 ·
I actually fell asleep during the last twenty minutes. Felt like they were filming on the exact same stretch of road over and over again.🤔Nothing special.
lonehound2 lonehound2 Member
16 messages
joined Jan 2015
#12 ·
Great movie. Forget World War Z—this is the gold standard for what a zombie flick should actually be!
Matthew Anderson4 Matthew Anderson4 Regular
598 messages
joined Jun 2013
#13 ·
Yeah, a movie where zombies eat farts is basically the blueprint for how a zombie flick should be.

To me, this was just mediocre, if that. Annoying characters, trash dialogue, that stupid fart MacGuffin because they couldn't think of anything better, the whole thing with the main guy's sister controlling the zombies... it's fine for one watch, but even then, there's zero tension. It isn't even funny, yet it acts like it is. Looking at the massive pile of zombie movies out there, I'd put this somewhere above Demented but below Cockneys vs Zombies.
bluenomad2 bluenomad2 Active Member
106 messages
joined Mar 2017
#14 ·
Exactly. Zombies work perfectly in horror comedies like Braindead or Shaun of the Dead. For more serious stuff, NOTLD remains my top pick for the genre.
lonehound2 lonehound2 Member
16 messages
joined Jan 2015
#15 ·
In World War Z, those zombies actually leap onto a helicopter mid-flight and start scaling the side. To me, that movie feels at least a bit more grounded in reality.
rustyraven4 rustyraven4 Member
38 messages
joined Oct 2014
#16 ·
Realism and zombies in the same sentence? 🤷
lonehound2 lonehound2 Member
16 messages
joined Jan 2015
#17 ·
rustyraven4 said:Can you actually put "realism" and "zombies" in the same sentence? 🤷

Exactly. My point was that this movie doesn't go overboard like World War Z—which is honestly a total disaster and only got decent reviews because Brad Pitt is in it. Obviously, zombies aren't real, but even if they were, I highly doubt they could scale walls like spiders or leap a hundred feet into the air like they’re some distant relative of Spider-Man. 😬
Nancy Howard4 Nancy Howard4 Active Member
75 messages
joined Sep 2022
#18 ·
First aid is everything🙏
When you realize they spent that much on the movie for such little money, it's just wild. If they had actually bothered to make it follow the book—which is easily a hundred times better than the film itself—maybe then they could have justified wasting all that cash

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads