CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › How long will terms like Junta and Nazi be tolerated on this forum?

How long will terms like Junta and Nazi be tolerated on this forum?

Started by fadedmason3 · · 👁 5 views · 9 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants fadedmason3Christian Torres3Charles Fox10Jack Cook7William Bennett53
fadedmason3 fadedmason3 MemberOP
11 messages
joined Oct 2015
#1 ·
This is just one recent example, and honestly, there are countless more—both reported and unflagged. The Junta has managed to crawl back into the mainstream once again, driven by the same old repeat offenders. This is happening despite the explicit agreement that we would stop labeling the legitimate Ukrainian Government as a "Junta" or using Nazi rhetoric. Furthermore, the calls for violence have been festering on this forum for months without any real intervention.

Seriously, how many reports does it take before these same vulgar users finally get banned?
fadedmason3 fadedmason3 MemberOP
11 messages
joined Oct 2015
#2 ·
Just a snippet from the latest manifesto put out by those same old recidivists. The previous post was wiped, but let me tell you, there was some seriously heavy stuff in there.

kontrasvijeta As Charles Fox10 points out:
Look, this fadedmason3 guy thinks he’s some kind of genius... but honestly, he really struggles when it comes to grasping the actual cause-and-effect relationships in these situations.

It’s a fundamental misunderstanding of cause and effect that people keep pushing. It wasn't the fall of Washington, D.C., that triggered Hitler; it was Hitler that led to the total leveling of Germany by the "Allies." It wasn't some small town being overtaken by an Axis-aligned state; it was the establishment of that regime that led to the destruction of the small town. It wasn't Al-Qaeda acting against the USA—it was the actions of the USA that paved the way for Al-Qaeda. You have to look at the sequence of events, not just the aftermath.

Well, look, let's just be honest about it: New Russia simply didn't happen. Period. It’s nothing but the Junta, plain and simple. Just the Junta. New Russia!

☕

Ringo10 As stated by:
That’s all well and good for now, but mark my words: once spring rolls around, we're going to see absolute, widespread chaos.

On the bright side, at least we can find some small comfort in the fact that... The Kyiv Junta. They could try to mobilize two million people if they really wanted to, but let’s be honest: it wouldn't matter one bit. It’s painfully obvious that there’s no real benefit to having those numbers on paper when the people themselves simply refuse to pick up a weapon and fight.

Are they even remotely aware of how much of a colossal failure this war actually is? It feels like they’re fighting purely for someone else's agenda—primarily Pro-US interests, though honestly, it's hard to say if there's something even more calculated at play here.

TheQuill As Charles Fox10 said:While Poroshenko was busy strolling through Paris yesterday, the shelling of Donetsk kicked off all over again. 😢

http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/

Zakharchenko stated regarding that specific issue that negotiations with... I can't believe we're still dealing with this nonsense. It’s honestly exhausting watching the same old patterns repeat themselves while everyone pretends they don't see what's right in front of them. We need to stop sugarcoating the reality of the situation and start calling things exactly what they are. They simply don't make any sense whatsoever.
During a recent discussion with his Latvian counterpart, Lavrov issued a stark warning, claiming they have intelligence suggesting that Kyiv is actively plotting to violate the Minsk agreements.
Word on the street is they’re planning to transition from these sporadic, localized shelling sessions into a full-scale offensive, allegedly kicking off around the 15th.

PS
If this turns out to be true, we’re looking at the activation of a chaos engine that absolutely nobody will be able to shut down. It’s over. You can kiss any semblance of peace in Europe goodbye.

PPS
There’s nothing quite like a classic New Year’s Eve cake in Kyiv to set the tone for the season.

Cannibalism. It’s one of those topics that most people would rather pretend doesn't exist, preferring to dwell in the comfort of polite society, but if we are going to have an honest conversation about the darker impulses of human nature, we cannot simply look away. There is something profoundly unsettling about the idea of consuming one's own kind, yet history and sociology suggest that when the veneer of civilization cracks—when resources vanish and survival becomes the only metric of success—the unthinkable becomes a grim reality. It isn't just a horror movie trope; it is a terrifying testament to what happens when the social contract is completely shredded.

Ringo10 As I see it:
I am talking about the West and their relentless, war-mongering hysteria.

Of course they aren't going to launch Iskanders at Ukraine. Even so, there’s this persistent effort to manufacture a sense of dread around them, trying to cultivate a specific kind of fear in the public consciousness.

They’re going to attempt to overthrow them. JuntaAnd if things don't go according to plan, we’re looking at nothing less than the total dissolution of that nation.

Ringo10 As Charles Fox10 said:Propaganda. It’s the oldest trick in the book, isn't it? We see it everywhere, swirling around us like a thick fog, designed specifically to cloud our judgment and steer the narrative toward whatever agenda is currently being pushed by those in power. They don't just want you to believe their version of reality; they want to make sure you can't even conceive of an alternative. It’s a relentless, calculated assault on the truth, wrapped up in polished media packages and shouted from every digital corner. They manufacture consent, feed us half-truths, and then act shocked when people start questioning the script. It’s exhausting, frankly, watching the same tired tactics play out over and over again under different guises. Those Kyiv Juntas. She might be a complete idiot, but there’s no denying that Gaga is incredibly loud when she starts spouting those anti-US talking points.
It’s not even about the Ukrainians anymore; it’s really just about this blatant, pathetic disregard for the rights of gays and lesbians.

I honestly don't understand how anyone can look at the current global landscape and fail to see the cracks forming in the foundation. We are witnessing a massive shift, a total realignment of power that most people are either too distracted or too terrified to acknowledge. The old guard thinks they can just maintain the status quo indefinitely, but the reality on the ground tells a completely different story. It’s not just about politics anymore; it’s about the very structure of how influence is exerted on the world stage. Everything we were taught to believe about stability is being dismantled right before our eyes. As stated by:
What an absolute disgrace DJON is!!!

Junta You have never once shown an ounce of respect; it’s nothing but constant attacks from your side. As for you being so preoccupied with peddling propaganda that isn't even worth the paper it's printed on—well, that's your business, but don't think for a second it doesn't reflect poorly on your own character!

Ringo10 said:I honestly thought we’d have to wait until spring for the big rollout, but clearly, nobody has the patience to sit around and wait anymore.

It looks like the rebels have finally caught wind that the Junta is gearing up for a massive offensive, and they've decided to strike first to get ahead of the curve.

There is a very real possibility that this uprising is going to spill over and spread into other parts of the Southeast.

Russia has to be dealt with once and for all. Those Kyiv Juntas.And that's something that can only be achieved through brute force.

Everything else is nothing more than a grand illusion.


Ringo10 said:That’s just the brutal reality of war. Things like this happen when the world is at its worst.

So, I was just scrolling through some maps online, and I noticed that the distance between Volnovakha and Telmanove is roughly 45 kilometers.

The rebel front lines have pushed forward to within 10 kilometers of Telmanov, yet we’re still looking at a remaining gap of 35 kilometers.

Oh, please, go ahead and lecture me on how they would actually achieve that kind of range.

Even if we were operating in a purely theoretical capacity where such an action was actually possible, at that kind of distance, you wouldn't be looking at a precision strike—you'd just be praying for a lucky shot.

Something smells fishy here. It’s the same old story, isn't it? Just like whenever things start heading in this direction... Junta propaganda, plain and simple.

kontrasvijeta said:It serves the interests of the Ukrainians just as much as it does Americans and their satellites to keep stirring the pot with Russia. By doing this, they secure endless streams of loans, military hardware, and equipment, all while branding Russia as the aggressor to the masses and feeding the populace a steady diet of nationalism. It’s a total win-win scenario for the Junta.

The New Russians absolutely crushed them during that initial chaos, even when Moscow's assistance was practically non-existent. Now that Moscow has properly sorted things out—and I believe they’ve equipped them sufficiently for defense—I don't see New Russia kneeling. However, Putin has maintained from the start that the people of New Russia must fight for their own cause and force the Junta to sit down at the negotiating table; the Russians are there as a secondary factor.
If we were to actually compare the level of support provided by the US and Europe to the Junta against what Russia provides to New Russia, we would be looking at a massive disparity in raw numbers. The Junta has sucked every last cent out of US and European funds, whereas the Russians are playing a much more calculated game.
Christian Torres3 Christian Torres3 Regular
604 messages
joined Sep 2014
#3 ·
Up

Can we get some eyes on these topics? Look, I get it—moderation is volunteer work, no big deal. But the same exact arguments from the same handful of people have been dragging on for months.

Or is there some unwritten rule now where if anyone talks about scammers, everyone involved just gets banned? Let’s just be real about how this works.
fadedmason3 fadedmason3 MemberOP
11 messages
joined Oct 2015
#4 ·
From a purely strategic standpoint, an assault on Debaltsye makes perfect sense.

The rebels have to dismantle that racket at any cost. Clearing it out will minimize casualties in Donetsk, allowing them to maintain their momentum as they push northward.

The Kyiv Junta has effectively dragged all its current reserves from the northern sectors right to the front lines.7


It’s the same group of people, over and over again, stubbornly clinging to the phrase "Kyiv Junta." It doesn't matter how many reports are filed; they just keep typing it. If I were to use the wrong term when referring to the separatists, I’d be crucified instantly. How many examples does it take? How many official complaints?
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#5 ·
What exactly is your motivation for reporting a post to the mods 10 (ten) minutes before you even bother to chime in yourself?

And by the way, you still haven't reported this exact post while I’ve been typing this.
fadedmason3 fadedmason3 MemberOP
11 messages
joined Oct 2015
#6 ·
Charles Fox10 said:And what exactly is your motive for showing up here to report a post ten minutes
before you even made this comment itself????

By the way, you haven't even reported this specific post yet (not that I'm kidding while typing this).

I've reported them in droves, but nothing changes; Ringo10 keeps using the word Junta for months on end. Reported posts result in absolutely zero action, while the exact same group of people churn out the same repetitive garbage day after day, month after month—and now you want to lecture me about reporting.

American bureaucracy equals forum administration.

For instance, I reported a post in the Ukraine thread where the new American president was referred to as a NATO blacksmith several days ago, yet it’s still sitting there right now:

Quote:That won't be any conversation after just one month of training. Here, boys, now you know everything and can go fight terrorists... (to quote the NATO blacksmith)
The very next day, the American shows up in a suit clutching contracts for private security firms.
Travel, salaries of two or three thousand dollars, top-tier equipment...
Body bags and then a quiet return to some small town where nobody will ever know what happened to you...
Jack Cook7 Jack Cook7 Regular
376 messages
joined Aug 2017
#7 ·
Look, saying ">" is pretty straightforward semantically. It’s got nothing to do with Nazis, communists, or any of that other stuff.

Basically, it refers to a group of people who seized power illegally, based on that country's own laws.

Or, more generally, it describes a group in power that stays there by ignoring the nation's laws—or just ignoring common sense entirely.

So, if you guys actually agree with my little definition here, you can judge for yourselves whether calling a certain Government a ">" is fair or not.
Christian Torres3 Christian Torres3 Regular
604 messages
joined Sep 2014
#8 ·
Jack Cook7 said:Using the word "Junta" is pretty straightforward semantically—it’s got nothing to do with Nazis, communists, or anyone else.

Basically, it refers to a group of people who seized power illegally under that country's laws.

Or more generally, it means a group holding onto power in a nation by ignoring its own laws, or just common sense.

If you actually agree with my definition, then go ahead and judge for yourselves if calling a certain government a "Junta" is justified.

Can we get a link to a definition that actually backs that up?

Because the term "junta" actually comes from Spain during the Napoleonic Wars, where it meant a self-organized group of prominent community members in an area, not some usurped power. Later on, the term military junta was adopted to describe collective rule by military officers who took over via a coup.

Regarding Ukraine, maybe that term made some sense before the elections, but now it definitely doesn't because the elections happened and nobody questioned their legitimacy.
fadedmason3 fadedmason3 MemberOP
11 messages
joined Oct 2015
#9 ·
There’s just no point in even trying. Whether you report it or not, it doesn't matter—both the Junta and those NATO dogs continue to operate here without any sanctions whatsoever. It’s painfully obvious that one particular moderator has deep family ties to Russia and has clearly manipulated the entire administration into adopting a pro-Russian bias.

The Ukrainian people and their legitimate government are being insulted, trampled upon, and humiliated on this forum without any restraint. The legally elected Government and the Prime Minister are branded as the Junta, called idiots, and subjected to all sorts of vile epithets. Even war crimes are brushed off as "no big deal," and all discussions regarding this are suppressed within this disgraceful thread. Just try accidentally referring to the separatists as terrorists; you'll see how quickly they turn on you.

Anyone who dares to show even a shred of resistance against this pro-Russian mob—led by that absolute hater andrejemx—gets torn apart and verbally abused, much like a pack of rabid dogs lunging at its prey. They’ve carved out their own little corner, driven away anyone with a backbone, and now they think they own the place.

I can only hope that, eventually, this whole shameful situation is exposed for what it truly is.
William Bennett53 William Bennett53 Regular
491 messages
joined Sep 2016
#10 ·
The term "NATO shill" has been used in two consecutive posts. One was censored, while the other wasn't, simply because the spacing between them was minimal. If this pattern continues, we will have to tighten the sanctions.
Labeling the Ukrainian government as a group of Hitler supporters is certainly not an acceptable way to express oneself; our moderators keep a close eye on when and why such language is used, intervening whenever they deem it necessary.
However, as you are well aware, we do not offer moderation on demand. The moderators are not some sort of jukebox that plays tunes upon request.
It is up to you to use the report button for anything that requires attention, and then simply be patient.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads