Defense attorneys can eat my ass!

Since I haven't seen any response from moderator Bubimir regarding my report on user @Mc Ozy and his signature—which reads "Veterans should eat mutton!"—

I find myself asking those in charge here: what would happen if I decided to put "Moderators should eat mutton!" or "Gay people should eat mutton!" in my own signature?
Let's not pretend to be naive; the intent behind @Mc Ozy's comment seems quite obvious to me.
I believe this constitutes a more severe form of hate speech, and I am earnestly requesting that appropriate disciplinary action be taken—not just against him, but perhaps also toward moderator Bubimir, who appears to be shielding him.

All set, thanks for the heads-up.

William Bennett53 said:It’s been handled—thanks for letting me know.

Thanks, though I don't see that the same user was actually sanctioned here.
A few weeks back, I received a red flag and lost 50 points from Nica for a signature where I didn't even insult anyone—yet this post by @Mc Ozy is actual hate speech.
Is it possible we're looking at a double standard?🤔

I just cleared that off my phone, so there’s still a chance I might face some sanctions once I get back to my desktop. But since you’re asking, moderation isn't something you can just pick and choose at will, and I'm fairly certain Nica didn't hand out that warning without good reason.

You closed this thread a bit too quickly, so I suppose I have to start a new one...🥱
I am formally requesting that @Mc Ozy be sanctioned—it seems their signature is filled with persistent hate speech.

I'm having a bit of trouble seeing how this qualifies as hate speech. While I suppose one could argue the signature itself is vulgar, the text also mentions those "insatiable privileged elites," which seems to be an opinion held by a significant portion of the American public who aren't necessarily backing these protests.

silvergardener6 said:How exactly does this qualify as hate speech? It’s noted that the signature is vulgar, sure—but it also claims the group consists of "insatiable elites," which I suppose reflects the sentiment held by a large portion of the public who aren't backing these protests.

I am not entirely sure if you have been following this closely enough.
The same individual used the signature "Veterans should eat mutton" earlier today, which William Bennett53 ended up deleting. Following that incident, he posted this current one.

I’ve locked this thread because you started comparing apples to oranges and attempting to dictate how everyone else should handle their own business.
Anyway, I am merging this with her post.