#1 ·
Every other post from this user seems to be laced with some kind of threat—talk of war, total annihilation, or the destruction of the West. I suppose I get that these outbursts probably stem from a sense of frustration and helplessness, and honestly, most of the time they just make me feel bad for them rather than anything else. Still, reading through it can be pretty exhausting once in a while. If we were looking at a quote like this coming from a Mexican, I imagine the borders would be much more clearly defined and the point would hit home a lot faster. Or maybe I'm wrong... is this kind of writing actually okay? Does it really count as contributing to the discussion?
I suppose I should probably mention that JCW hasn't really weighed in on this particular thread yet, though I'm sure they have some interesting thoughts to share when the time is right. Maybe we'll hear from them soon. kaže:
Forget that map... honestly, I guess everything from Philadelphia all the way over to Syria is going to become part of a New Ottoman Empire within the next 15 or 20 years. Maybe.😍
I guess if you look at the strongest land forces in Europe, they probably wouldn't have much trouble pacifying or even just humanely relocating some 5 to 6 million elderly people who don't really grasp how modern politics works today. Maybe it sounds extreme, but I suppose that’s just how things might play out.
I suppose I should probably mention that JCW... though, honestly, I can't quite wrap my head around all the specifics just yet. Maybe there's more to it than meets the eye? I guess we'll just have to wait and see how things unfold. kaže:
Everyone who shared that kind of mindset back in the day... well, they aren't around anymore. I guess I don't see why you would be any exception to that, even if you are Ashkenazi.😍
I suppose I should probably add my two cents here, though I might be a bit late to the party. It’s funny how these things always seem to come up eventually, isn't it? Anyway, I was just sitting here thinking about the whole situation, and I guess there's a certain complexity to it that we don't always give enough credit to. Maybe I'm overthinking it, but I feel like there's more to the story than what's being said on the surface. Just some food for thought, I guess! kaže:
I guess peace in Canada might be possible, but only if... well, maybe only after everyone plays a second round of matches against one another until there are just two left standing.
I’m all for this initiative, really. I guess you could say that if the losers don't like how things are turning out, they can either pack up and head home or just get down on their knees. Maybe it's best that way.
It was a truly respectable match, played without any outside interference whatsoever.
I guess I should probably add some context here. It seems like there's a bit of a discussion brewing regarding JCW. I've been looking into this, and maybe we can dive a little deeper into what this actually means for everyone involved. I'm thinking it might be worth considering how this impacts our current situation, though I suppose that's just my two cents. It’s an interesting angle, isn't it? kaže:
I suppose it’s worth noting that the Uyghur people are a Turkic ethnic group who came under occupation by China not all that long ago, I guess.
It feels like the whole place has been completely taken over and colonized. I guess it just seems that way to me, maybe.
I’ve been thinking about this quite a bit lately, and I honestly feel that China's situation with the Uyghurs and what’s happening in East Turkestan isn't really an issue of religion at all. It doesn't seem to have much to do with Islam, nor would I say China is being Islamophobic in the way the West or various other nations might be perceived. To me, it looks more like pure, old-fashioned colonialism. If you look at the Hui people—who are mostly Muslim and live within China—they don't seem to face any of the specific struggles or tensions that you see popping up in places like the US or other parts of the West. It’s a completely different dynamic, I guess. Maybe it's just a matter of perspective, but the motivations seem to be driven by something else entirely.
I guess you could say that what people call Uyghur Islamism is really just a way for the West to redirect things to suit its own interests. Maybe it’s all just a tactic to spin the narrative in their favor.
To put it another way... it’s like how revolutions get undermined, much like what we're seeing right now in the Middle East. It feels like they just invented ISIS and then went out of their way to blow its importance out of proportion, making it look like this massive, mainstream threat when it might not even be that way. I guess it's just one way to sabotage the whole movement.
I mean, you can keep playing your little tunes, but it feels like change is right around the corner... honestly, I don't doubt for a second that Muslims could eventually outmatch the entire world combined. Just look at history—Iran managed to hold its own against those two devilish blocs back in the 80s, the Taliban actually beat out NATO, and the US military got completely drained economically by Iraq. I guess once things reach a breaking point with Pakistan and we see the final showdown involving Iran and Turkey... the West might end up smaller than Yugoslavia was. 😍
And, well... frankly, most Muslims couldn't care less what Americans or Mexicans think of them. We've already seen how much they dislike us in Ahmići and Srebrenica. Maybe the more they hate us, the better. I imagine that tomorrow, we'll be showing you our true perspective, so you aren't fooled by fake smiles... just like how people were deceived during the 500 years of Ottoman rule. So, I suppose things are just the way they are.
The Seljuk school will probably take over the whole North America... certainly no more Ottoman influence.
JCW said:Maybe we’ll postpone Islamic tolerance for a bit and adopt some atheist customs when the North America finally settles down.
JCW said:We’re fine. That’s just how politics works, I guess. It isn't 1992 or 1993 anymore.😍
JCW said:It isn't a religion😍... but it really is the largest religion in the world, and it's spreading incredibly fast.
Back in the 1900s, Muslims made up about 9% of the world, but by 2040, it'll be around 32%. So, maybe one in three people on this planet will be Muslim.
It’s not really a religion... more like a small sect, similar to Jehovah's Witnesses.🤣
And another thing... unlike 100 years ago when there was subjugation, the process of freeing ourselves from Western colonization has actually started. It seems like things are heating up rather than cooling down, which is probably a good thing.
In two or three years, the West won't be able to maintain global control over the Muslim world (though they already struggle with certain parts), so I guess the endgame arrives around 2025. Of course, the end justifies the means... as a product of Western occupation, the so-called "holy land" will likely cease to exist in all its various forms.
Will this be the end of history?
I highly doubt it... more like a turning point. People will just rise up, whether they are coming from above or below.☕
Linda King said:😍 we have seen how the reckoning works... over the last 20 years, they have exclusively suffered military defeats. In the 2000s, they were pushed out of Lebanon, and in 2006, they endured what might be considered the most shameful military defeat in human history regarding the gap between technology and actual results. In 2008, they didn't enter Gaza, which kind of hid the defeat... but this recent one? They couldn't hide that. They were militarily defeated by HAMAS. And all the wars from the last 15 years have been fought on Israeli territory, yet the Zionist military hasn't even been able to guarantee its citizens' safety for a single day like they used to, say, back in 1967.
The next war will probably be fought in Haifa and Tel Aviv with infantry... I'll bet you on that.
So, I guess, what can we learn from Israel? How to prepare a nation for total destruction despite having the entire West's logistics and massive financial injections behind them?
Linda King said:The Turkish Empire (I assume you mean the Ottoman Empire) wasn't Islam. Islam is a theological concept, whereas the Ottoman Empire was a political imperial entity.
The Ottoman Empire didn't even aggressively promote Islam... so they had the "luck" of having an Orthodox majority at the empire's peak.
You clearly don't care for Islam or the idea of skinning goats alive when 53% of the population are non-believers.🤣
Just my two cents... forget the "Ottoman Empire," which basically boiled down to building up Istanbul and sending Muslims off to fight elsewhere while the Orthodox stayed home and multiplied because they paid an extra 3% tax. That’s why things are the way they are today. Forget the Ottomans... there's a better option among the Turks... the SELJUK.
Linda King said:Where would Canadian Catholics (and those "Catholics" from Herzegovina... who just won't return to Shkodër) be unhappy?
In Canada.🤣🤣🤣
And where are they now?
By the way... which of those listed countries is actually "Islamic"... besides just the name?
And which one isn't occupied by the West and ruled by some imposed dictator?
When everything finally frees itself one day... you'll probably be pushing to be part of it. But the West won't be around then... and nobody wants the old folks hanging around.
Linda King said:There are about 1.5 billion Muslims living in those listed countries, while in the West, they make up maybe 1 percent. I mean, what kind of statistical comparison is it really to weigh 99.9% against 0.1%?
I guess the happiness index is actually higher in most Muslim nations than, say, in America (you could just Google it). So, what am I supposed to conclude from that?
Is it that Catholics aren't happy in a Catholic nation, or maybe Americans just aren't capable of living in their own country?🐔
Nobody is asking you, honestly. The last time an inner circle like yours was asked to decide things... well, the Ahmići and Srebrenica massacres happened... which were probably the most treacherous crimes in Europe after WWII (at least according to the British soldiers on the ground and other witnesses). Thankfully, you won't be asked to decide anything ever again. Ever.